Samuel Girod, an Amish Farmer Residing in the State of Kentucky, Formally Sentenced to 6 Years of Incarceration in a State-Funded Penitentiary in Lieu of Eastern Kentucky District Court Judge Danny C. Reeves's Ruling That He Violated USFDA Regulatory Policy in What Reeves Deemed as "His Refusal to Comply With the Agency's Product Labeling Guidelines" in the Sale and Marketing of Herbal Supplements

The terse written excerpt, as well as the 5 minute, 47 second cinematic presentation accompanying it, examines the plight of Samuel Girod, an Amish farmer and resident of Bath County, Kentucky; who was formally sentenced to serve six years in prison following what Eastern Kentucky District Court Judge Danny C. Reeves deemed as an 'overt attempt by the defendant to blatantly disregard USFDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) regulatory standards in the sale and marketing of various herbal supplements for which he hadn't adhered to said agency's product labeling guidelines.'

From Amish America

LEXINGTON, Ky. (WKYT) – A federal judge sentenced a Bath County Amish farmer to six years in prison on Friday morning.

A federal jury handed down guilty verdicts against Samuel Girod in March for misbranding products.

After serving six years, Girod will have three years of supervised release. He must also refrain from producing and manufacturing products during that time. That judge said Girod exhibited continuous and blatant disregard for the law.

A brief summation of Girod’s offenses:

At his trial in March of this year, the evidence established that Girod had been manufacturing and selling homemade products to businesses in numerous states and that the products did not comply with FDA regulations. Specifically, one of his products was dangerous when used in the manner recommended and all three were advertised in a way that did not comply with the law.

In 2013, a federal judge in Missouri ordered Girod to stop manufacturing and selling his products, until his labeling and advertisement of the products met FDA regulations. Despite the court order, Girod continued to manufacture these products and sell them in Indiana, Wisconsin and Illinois, marketing them in the exact same manner as he had before the court order.

The evidence further established that, as part of the 2013 order, the judge required inspections of Girod’s facility in Bath County, to ensure his compliance with the order. In November 2013, two FDA Consumer Safety Officers attempted to conduct the court-ordered inspection of Girod’s facility, but they were prevented from conducting the inspection by Girod and others on his property. Then, after the criminal case against him began, Girod tampered with a witness, failed to appear for court proceedings, and was a fugitive for several months.

Girod may file an appeal, but it’s not known if he intends to do so.


CRITICAL ANALYSIS: Let the harsh reality of Eastern Kentucky District Court Judge Danny C. Reeves’s decision to impose a 6-year term of confinement, a sentence which Samuel Girod will be required to serve no less than three years, weigh heavily on your conscience. For we reside in a nation where the rule of law is subject to the discretion of its political assemblies (Persons that the corporate telecommunications industry insists have been duly elected to represent the best interests of the civilian population), as well as their judicial contemporaries, both of which routinely abandon their presupposed code of ethics in favor of the most affluent segments of society, choosing instead to visit a bevy of irredeemable vituperations upon the plebeian aggregate. The reality of a two-tiered system of justice has never been more evident, when members of the status quo can act with impunity, freely pillaging the public trust while enriching their constituents within the financial sector at the expense of the electorate, embroiling the nation in a limitless deluge of military conflicts and combat operations for which no clear path to victory can be reasonably expected, despoiling the institution of faith and sound religious doctrine to mollify a burgeoning secularist consensus, engineer the dissolution of national sovereignty through the actualization of a series of international trade agreements,

orchestrate the capital murder of individuals whose crisis of conscience compelled them to sever their ties with deleterious elements of the political establishment, etc., all of this without even the mention of consequence. Federal prosecutors tasked with the responsibility of presenting evidence of culpability on the part of the defendant during the course of the trial-based proceeding were rumored to have sought a 68-year term of imprisonment coupled with a $3 million penalty of restitution, prior to Reeves's ruling. Imagine for a moment the reaction of Girod's family at the prospect of one of their own, an individual whose standing within the community is unblemished, being given such a sentence, all the while murderers, rapists, and narcotics traffickers throughout the whole of the continental United States are typically required to serve less time.

Interested parties are invited to participate in the following online petition:

Petition to Free Kentucky State Amish Farmer Samuel Girod

- as Girod's sole chance at freedom rests firmly with the issuance of a presidential pardon by acting U.S. President Donald J. Trump.

Jonathan Holmes Gruber, the One-Time Self-Professed Architect of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), Who Is Also a Tenured Professor of Economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Argues With Fox News Channel Political Analyst and Correspondent Tucker Carlson Over What He Describes as 'an Attempt by Opponents of the Law to Somehow Delegitimize the Efficacy of Its Mandate"

Born on September 30th of 1965, Jonathan Holmes Gruber, is a tenured professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), a position he has held since 1992. He is also acknowledged as the director of the Health Care Program at the National Bureau of Economic Research, where he is also employed as a research associate, as well as the associate editor of two separate peer-reviewed academic journals - both the Journal of Public Economics and the Journal of Health Economics.

Recall that Gruber made mention of an unspoken reliance on the ‘stupidity of the American voter’ to guarantee its passage, a fact that he now disputes on the basis of the quote’s inaccuracy, choosing instead to cite that his statements were ‘taken out of context.’ 

On January 25th of 2017, during the course of a live syndicated television broadcast, Gruber was confronted on several key issues pertaining to the aforementioned piece of legislation - primarily its impacts on the economy, as well as its effects on the middle class, both of which he would later claim to be negligible. The brief 9 minute and 13 second video below, which aired on the Fox News Channel's Tucker Carlson Tonight program details the contents of this verbal exchange:

Several points need to be reiterated, specifically the context of several utterances made in the interview by Gruber, all of which are detailed in the following:
“Well I -uh - I mean the polls have moved a lot Tucker, we don't really know where the public is at this point, it's in flux. I, I-I, think they feel that way because there’s been a lot of misinformation about what the law has done, here's a simple example Tucker: ‘Everyone agrees that Obamacare has increased insurance coverage in America, but if you ask Americans what Obamacare’s done to insurance coverage, almost as many claim that its decline has gone up, I think that's a prime example of the misinformation that’s been spread, I think Americans just don't understand what this law's done for them."
~ Proclamation made in response to Carlson's contentions that a strong majority of Americans, an estimated 60 percent, want to see the PPACA repealed entirely or in part
“People who oppose the law are people who haven't benefited from the law, but haven't been hurt from the law, they’ve just heard - in-in my view - they’ve just heard a lot of bad misinformation about it.”
~ Claim made in response to an earlier statement disputing the PPACA’s scope of approval in the public arena
“This law was never supposed to help everybody Tucker, that wasn't the design, the law was actually explicitly designed first in Massachusetts, and then for the nation, to leave the vast majority of Americans alone. People that had health insurance that worked for them through their employer, the government, were not designed to be affected by this law by in large in the near term; they were hoped to benefit in the long term through lowering costs, but in the near term the law was designed to fix what was wrong with our system, which was focused on the 20 percent of Americans who did not have health insurance or were buying it through a broken non-group insurance system. That was the design of the law.”
~ Iteration made in response to Carlson's suggestion that passage of the law was intended to benefit all Americans

“Who’s been hurt by Obamacare is two groups: 'One is the wealthiest Americans, -uh, the top 2% of Americans that had to pay new taxes (notice how Gruber acknowledges in this quote that the bill is, in fact, an additional tax levied on consumers by the Federal Government pursuant to the edicts ratification; a contention that was steadfastly denied by both the mainstream media, as well as the proponents of the legislative mandate in question), and second is, the very healthy individuals who benefited from a previously discriminatory insurance market. So before insurers could kick sick people out - well, that's bad for sick people, but good for healthy people - so if you're a young healthy person in the market you benefited from the fact that sick people were excluded. Obamacare said, 'no,' insurers have to behave fairly, insure everyone, that meant that for some young, healthy people their premiums went up.’”
~ Statement made in response to a question posed by Carlson regarding the affordability of the 2010 health care provision 

“Tucker that's a trivial part of the issue, the reason healthy people are paying more is not the extra services, it's that they're being asked to fairly be in a pool with healthy and sick people. The extra services are a trivial distraction from the problem. That's not what drives the costs.”
~ Utterance made following Carlson's contention that everyday Americans are justified in their grievances of having to assume the fiscal burden of having to pay for services outlined within the context of the PPACA which they themselves would never have need of
CONCLUSION: Anyone who views this particular exchange, and then glances over the context of Gruber’s equivocations regarding the substantive benefits of a legislative measure whose enactment was based largely on the ignorance of the general public, should reach a similar conclusion with regard to the political establishment’s overt display of contempt for the proletariat.

Startling Open Admission Made on Live Syndicated CNBC News Broadcast by Richard W. Fisher, Former President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Regarding the Deliberate Overinflation of U.S. Financial Markets as a Standard Prerequisite of Artificially-Induced Wealth Creation

In the course of several minutes, during one of CNBC’s many syndicated telecasts, Richard W. Fisher, former President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, openly acknowledges his role in the over inflation of the prevailing market system dynamic as a method of artificially-induced wealth creation and asset redistribution. Fisher goes on to describe - in detail - the precarious nature of the nation’s economy as a result of these fiscally-motivated policies that were instituted by the U.S. Federal Reserve System in the wake of the Financial Crisis of 2007-2008, as the following excerpts obtained from the cinematic reference appearing at the terminus of this entry will attest to:

“What the Fed did, and I was part of that group, is we front-loaded an enormous market rally in order to accomplish a wealth effect… and a great digestive period is likely to take place now.”

Conclusive Evidence Substantiating Contentions of the Federal Reserve System's Status as an Autonomous Agency Possessing Extrajudicial Immunity

A vast majority of those residing in the continental United States remain woefully ignorant of the fact that the Federal Reserve System operates independently of judicial mandate - that its Board of Governors are an unelected coterie of fiscally-motivated malcontents dedicated to the pursuit of luxury through an orchestrated strategy of economic insolvency at the expense of society’s most vulnerable population segments. The truth of this statement clearly illustrated in the following:

Another utterance made by Alan Greenspan - the acting Chairman of the Federal Reserve of the United States from 1987 until 2006 - during the course of a Congressional oversight hearing in 2005, makes mention of provisions allowing for members of the political establishment to effectively circumvent Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution with regard to the issuance of currency. This measure, known as the Coinage Clause, reads as follows:
“The Congress shall have Power To... coin Money, regulate the Value thereof... and of foreign Coin”
NOTE - The use of capital letters in portions of the above decree, oftentimes the subject of hypothetical conjecture by those insisting upon its inherent significance in terms of legal parlance, purportedly bears no substantive or retroactively binding effect as detailed in the paragraphs below:
Throughout most of the eighteenth-century, it was common for drafters to begin every noun with a capital letter, just as Germans do today.  This convention was fading by the time the Constitution was drafted (1787), but Gouverneur Morris, who actually penned the final document, elected to follow it. That is why nouns in the original Constitution are capitalized.
However, Morris made a few mistakes, and some nouns were left without capitals.  They include:  “defence” in the Preamble, “credit” in Article I, Section 8, Clause 2 (the congressional borrowing power); “duty” in Article I, Section 9, Clause 1; and “present” in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8.
Two years later, when (under the guidance of James Madison) the First Congress drafted the Bill of Rights, it elected to drop the capitalization rule. Nevertheless, a few mistakes crept in: Several of the nouns in the Bill of Rights were capitalized.
The capitalization or non-capitalization of a word has no substantive effect, although when used to introduce a phrase it can serve as a clue to meaning.
LINKED ARTICLE OF REFERENCE:
Dispelling the Notion of Legal Significance Regarding the Capitalization of Certain Terms in the U.S. Constitution

Mentioned earlier in a previous stanza was a statement made by Alan Greenspan, then the acting Chairman of the Federal Reserve of the United States, emphasizing the ability of acting members of the government establishment to bypass Constitutional edict in the creation of monetary assets and instrumentation, a testimonial excerpt detailed in the following:

Numerous proclamations of admonition referencing the pernicious underpinnings of the Federal Reserve System were made soon after, the most notable of which evidenced in the illustrations accompanying this particular entry:

Congressional Representative Luis Thomas MacFadden, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency. Congressional Record 12595-12603 (Friday, June 10th, 1932)

Barry Morris Goldwater, a five-term United States Senator from Arizona (1953-1965, 1969-1987), and the Republican National Committee’s nominee for president in the 1964 electoral cycle.

Ronald Ernest “Ron” Paul, former member of the U.S. House of Representatives in the state of Texas’s 14th and 22nd Congressional Districts, one-time presidential nominee of the Libertarian Party in the 1988 electoral cycle, and a noted author and physician.

Other articles of reference substantiating prior assertions of the Federal Reserve System’s sinister scope of influence over the U.S. financial system are listed accordingly:

9 Reasons Why the U.S. Federal Reserve System’s Quantitative Easing Strategy Will Hasten America’s Descent Into Fiscal Ruin

Eight Ways the U.S. Federal Reserve System Has Negatively Impacted the U.S. Economy

REPORT: The U.S. Federal Reserve System’s Efforts to Stimulate the U.S. Economy Following the Financial Crisis of 2008 Through the Strategy of Quantitative Easing Has Cost Savers an Estimated $470 Billion Dollars in Interest-Generated Income

How Zero Bound Interest Rates Impact the Savings Function of America’s Free Market Capitalist Dynamic

U.S. President's Scope of Allegiance Called Into Question as Familial Connection to Organized Terrorist Networks Throughout the World is Established

Would that the mainstream media have addressed this issue prior to the 2008 and 2012 electoral cycles, perhaps Barack Hussein Obama’s rise to power and his ascension to political prominence in the United States from the shadows of obscurity could have culminated in an altogether different outcome. Had they investigated the dealings of his siblings - specifically those of his half-brother - there would have been little doubt as to where the sympathies of the then Illinois Senator actually rested. The following video, a terse presentation that is 7 minutes in duration, clarifies these misconceptions, providing prospective viewing audiences with a glimpse into the life of an individual whose past is seldom called into question by those claiming to have a vested interest in the welfare of the country as a whole.

High Treason in America

In the past several months a considerable degree of attention has been placed on the emergence of ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) as a transnationalist extension of a burgeoning Islamic Fundamentalist Empire - the barbarity of its rise to prominence chronicled at length by telecommunications agencies around the world, as geopolitical luminaries pledge their resilience in combating what they so often characterize as an ‘unpredictable’ menace to the safety and security of their nation states. This inability to act - they would have you believe - more indicative of an absence of familiarity with the mindset and tendencies of Wahhabist fanaticists, rather than evidence of interadministrative collaboration as a means of regional destabilization - a sequence of events that, in theory, was designed to culminate in the ouster of Bashar al-Assad from power in Syria under the guise of humanitarian interventionism. 

This brief cinematic presentation - a syndicated news segment entitled, ‘Reality Check,’ airing on WGCL-TV (CBS 46), and hosted by Ben Swann - as well as the 7-page declassified DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) document immediately following, offers insight into the role the U.S. Federal Government played in the manufacture of what has become a global crisis of exigency.



Figure 1. 7-Page DIA document released by Judicial Watch affirming the Obama Administration’s use of ISIS as an integral component of a broader, more comprehensive strategy of foreign policy designed to mitigate the influence of the Assad regime in Syria.

Judicial Watch’s publication of the 2012-issue DIA documentation lent more credence into assertions by members of the independent media regarding the possible involvement of the U.S. Federal Government with Islamic extremist organizations throughout the Middle East. These claims were further bolstered during the course of the last several days as reports of leaflets being distributed to ISIS subjugated regions of Syria and Iraq 45 minutes prior to aerially conducted tactical offensives by the U.S. military were made public in both pictures, as well as in print:

Figure 2. Purported leaflets that are alleged to have been distributed to loyalist factions of ISIS militancy contingents 45 minutes prior to the deployment of incendiary weapons by U.S. operated warplanes.

LINKED ARTICLE OF REFERENCE:

Advanced Warnings in the Form of Leaflets Distributed to ISIS Militants 45 Minutes Prior to U.S. Military Bombing Raids on Oil Tankers and Fuel Platforms by Order of the President

This, however, isn’t the only development in the virtual indictment of the acting President's questionable scope of allegiance, as yet another release of information - a written publication from bizpac review - highlights the issuance of command directives by high ranking government officials prohibiting the use of explosive ordnance in 75 percent of the U.S. Navy and Air Force’s assigned target areas.
This article, as it appears in its entirety, offers detailed analysis into the Obama Administration’s rationale behind this course of action:

The Obama Administration has blocked 75 percent of military strikes against the Islamic State group, according to the chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif.

Pilots returning from the battlefield said that the targets are often blocked by the administration for fear of collateral damage and civilian casualties, the Washington Free Beacon reported.

“You went 12 full months while ISIS was on the march without the U.S. using that air power and now as the pilots come back to talk to us they say three-quarters of our ordnance we can’t drop, we can’t get clearance even when we have a clear target in front of us,” the representative said. “I don’t understand this strategy at all because this is what has allowed ISIS the advantage and ability to recruit.”

A retired four-star general called the policy absurd.

“This has been an absurdity from the beginning,” retired Gen. Jack Keane said, responding to questions from Royce, according to the Free Beacon. “The president personally made a statement that has driven air power from the inception.”

“When we agreed we were going to do airpower and the military said, this is how it would work, he [Obama] said, ‘No, I do not want any civilian casualties,’” Keane said. “And the response was, ‘But there’s always some civilian casualties. We have the best capability in the world to protect from civilians casualties.’”

The general said Obama’s response was,  “No, you don’t understand. I want no civilian casualties. Zero.”

Obama’s stance on the possibility of civilian casualties resulting from preemptive air strikes on selected targets is laughable, considering the fact that under the current administration the use of unmanned aerial reconnaissance vehicles, predominantly in areas of Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia resulted in the deaths of nearly 2,500 during the course of his political tenure.

A fact later celebrated by members of the mainstream media as justifiable recourse, as well as the President himself, during the White House Correspondents Association event of 2010.

CONCLUSION: This serves as yet another instance where the U.S. Federal Government has aided and abetted radical extremist organizations in the Middle East through the misappropriation of funds acquired by a compulsory system of earned income confiscation, and the majority of Americans could care less.

Wesley Clark - Retired General of the United States Army, Former Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) of NATO, and One-Time Presidential Candidate Operating Under the Auspices of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) - Publicly Supports the Enactment of Legislative Policy Mandating the Indefinite Detention of Societal Elements Deemed “Radical” or “Seditionist” by the Political Establishment in Internment Camps for the Duration of the Government’s War on Terror

Retired and highly decorated US Army General Wesley Clark, who also served as the SCAEUR (Supreme Allied Commander Europe) of NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) from 1997 to 2000 ˡ, and was actively invested in the political process during the Presidential Elections of 2004 ² - originally as a candidate in 2003 and later as a campaign organizer for then acting Massachusetts State Senator John Kerry who would become the Democratic nominee in the following years electoral cycle - and again in 2008, made a stunning pronouncement regarding the reinstitution of World War II-era civilian internment camps* and forced labor brigades for individuals deemed “disloyal” or vehemently opposed to the government’s policies and stance concerning the War on Terror during a syndicated telecast on MSNBC with the following statements:

* The subject of civilian inmate labor programs being instituted throughout the continental United States as part of a broader measure of deterrence in the incidence of domestic terrorism is detailed in the following documentation:


Army Regulation 210-35 | Civilian Inmate Labor Program

Military Field Manual 3-39.40 | Internment and Resettlement Operations
“In World War II if -uh someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States,  w-we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, -uh w-we put him in a - in a camp - we - they were prisoners of war. So if these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they’re disloyal to the United States - as a matter of principle - fine that’s their right; it’s our right and our obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict, and I think we’re gonna have to increasingly get tough on this, not only in the United States but our allied nations like Britain and Germany and France are going to have to look at their domestic law procedures.”

However, as Kurt Nimmo of Infowars.com correctly pointed out, World War II was a war declared under Article I, Section 8, Clause II of the Constitution whereas the government’s War on Terror is an illegitimate enterprise that was not formally declared by Congressional mandate as is required by said provision. Another element of contention regarding the use of military force rests in the fact, that since Vietnam, U.S. combat operations have been executed in compliance with UN (United Nations) mandate, in the context of joint congressional resolutions, or within the confines of the War Powers Resolution - also known as the War Powers Act - of 1973. Another important contention that was also made mention of in the written contents of Nimmo’s article concerns the following:

The Bush Administration declared the War on Terror would last a generation or more. Senior officials within the Obama Administration - meanwhile have been quoted as saying - when formulating the “disposition matrix" to determine how terrorism suspects will be disposed of - they had reached a “broad consensus that such operations are likely to be extended at least another decade” or more.

Clark - who is himself no stranger to controversy - during a nationally televised segment of the Megyn Kelly broadcast on Fox News, openly admitted that the U.S. Federal Government exploited the resurgence of Islamic extremism during the Soviet-Afghan War as a means of fulfillment in the realization of foreign policy objectives. A fact evident in the following statement, as well as in the video accompanying it:

“Radical Islam is used -- we, the United States, used Radical Islam to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. We begged the Saudis to put the money in -- they did. And this is all part of this.”


ˡ It was in this 3 year time period that Clark, as the acting director of Operation Allied Force, coordinated several tactical military weapons offensives against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia during the height of the Kosovo War.

² Clark himself entered the 2004 race for the Democratic Party presidential nomination as a candidate in 2003 only to later withdraw following a convincing victory at the Oklahoma state primary - a sequence of events that would culminate with his endorsement of then Massachusetts State Senator John Kerry as the Democratic nominee.

The evolution of Islamic fundamentalism into its present state was also a topic of discussion that was elaborated on in detail by Michael Flynn, formerly employed as the Director for the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), who offered the following assessment during an interview with al Jazeera’s Mehdi Hasan*:


* The contents of this dialogue being presented in interview format, inclusive of Flynn’s responses as well as Hasan’s line of questioning (This exchange beginning at 12:06 of the above feature):

HASAN: You are basically saying that even in government at the time you knew those groups were around, you saw this analysis --

FLYNN: Sure.

HASAN: -- and you were arguing against it, but who wasn’t listening?

FLYNN: I think -uh, I think the administration.

HASAN: So the administration turned a blind eye to your analysis?

FLYNN: I don’t know if they turned a blind eye. I think it was a decision. I think it was a willful decision.

HASAN: A willful decision to go support an insurgency that had Salafists, al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood?

FLYNN: It was a willful decision to do what they’re doing. Which - Which you have to really -- you have to really ask the President what is it that he actually is doing with the - with the -uh policy that is in place because it is very, very confusing -- I’m still sitting here today Mehdi and I don’t - I can’t tell you exactly what that is and I’ve been at this for a long time. 

This notion of engineering the creation of a globally centralized terrorist network as a means of fulfilling certain foreign policy objectives is a subject clarified in the 19th tenet of the Illuminati/ New World Order Manifesto - the entirety of which can be found at the following link.

19) The Organization of a Globalized Terrorist Apparatus: This subject details the genesis of a federally coordinated alliance of terrorist nationals into an organized network of insurgent forces/ public dissidents through acts of negotiation. These actions attain a measure of precedence in the culmination of events deemed contrary to the establishment of international policy, and are designed to foster an atmosphere of regional instability. 

CONCLUSION: Basically, in the simplest of terms, the contents of this brief exposition serve to illustrate the fact that the creation of a globally centralized terrorist national organization and recruitment apparatus - a process that was monetarily funded by the governments of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE (United Arab Emirates), and Turkey, as well as the American taxpayer - is designed to foster an atmosphere of regional instability that would expedite the ouster of the Assad regime in Syria* on the pretext of human rights violations³. Clark’s statements regarding the revival of World War II-era practices of incarceration echo the current political administration’s stance on individuals or organizations that act in defiance of these objectives - a fact evidenced with the targeting of conservative institutions and agencies by the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) and the classification of certain segments of the population by various elements within the status quo as ‘seditionist malcontents.’ Therefore it is logical to assume - in light of this discussion - that those possessing the closest ties to the inner sanctum of the present establishment fully intend to use these threats of imprisonment as instruments of intimidation, and as part of a concerted effort designed to shape public opinion in their favor.   

* Assad’s removal from power is thought to coincide with the fact that Syria’s current system of finance operates independently from the fiscal constraints of the IMF (International Monetary Fund), and while its principal banking institution is recognized as the Central Bank of Syria, the fiduciary infrastructure of the nation itself exhibits autonomy from the pervasive influence of the Rothschild Dynastic Order. 

³ Recall that this particular tactic of involvement was attempted, based on intelligence information linking the current leader of Syria with the 2013 chemical weapons attacks that occurred in Ghouta - contrived narrative that has since been proven disingenuous - in 2014 by the Obama Administration on the basis of human rights violations as determined by the UN’s Human Rights Council.

Obama’s Utterance Regarding a Renewed Focus in the Training of ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) Indicative of a Simple Error in Judgment During the Course of a Syndicated Press Conference, or Something Else Entirely?

This brief 15 second video excerpt of Barack Hussein Obama during the course of a syndicated press conference airing on July 6, 2015 has many people questioning the actual intent of the President with regard to a statement referencing a renewed focus in the training and support of ISIL, a terse proclamation later redacted by the White House (Link 1, Link 2), specifically the Office of the Press Secretary, at some point in the afternoon. This fact evident in the following illustration:

However, given the duplicitous nature of the current political administration, especially in light of Arizona State Senatorial Representative John McCain’s proven association with Syrian rebel contingents (loose knit organizations that are consistently labeled as ‘moderate’ oppositional paramilitary extensions of the broader Iraqi Army) responsible for the abduction and detainment of 11 Shi’ite Pilgrims, can anyone honestly afford to discount the possibility of inter-administrative collaboration?

Channeling the Belief and Philosophical Ideology of Noted Historian Howard Zinn, Matt Damon Offers His Perspective on the Necessity of Civil Disobedience as a Means of Preventing the Devolvement of Political Systems of Governance Into Tyrannical Institutions of Enslavement

This brief 4 minute and 50 second video featuring one of the Entertainment Industry's most celebrated performers, in this particular instance, Matthew Paige “Matt” Damon, offers prospective viewing audiences a glimpse into the mind of an individual who appears to - at least on the surface - champion the ideals of the late Howard Zinn during one of his many public speaking engagements.

Citing the necessity of the general population’s right to openly and actively debate elected ˡ officials through a series of dialogues serves to illustrate the actor’s stance regarding the importance of dissent. The ability of those who would serve as the facilitators² of a devoutly corrupt and deliberately incompetent system of governance that routinely exploits the less fortunate through its interpretation of law ³ to come to a consensus on anything of substance recognized as a pressing obstacle.

An Absence of Accountability With Regard to the Duplicitous Character of America’s Political Establishment | A Case Study Into the Psychological Profile of ‘President’ Barack Obama

 

How many times should the political establishment be permitted to openly deceive their constituencies in the general public? Are the lies of government officials more permissible because of their positions of authority? Do elected representatives have a responsibility to preserve the integrity of a nation’s image to the world community by conducting themselves in a forthright manner?

Perhaps, at one time, these questions merited a greater degree of scrutiny from those who made the conscious decision to participate in the blatantly fraudulent enterprise of the electoral process - a vote-based sequence where prospective candidates are selected by nebulous contingents within the corporate-industrial arena years in advance of their emergence on the national stage. The following presentation chronicles one individual’s attempts in perfecting the art of deceptive advertisement to national viewing audiences, a person who, strangely enough, is still held in high regard by many of those whose unwavering level of support defies reason - Barack Hussein Obama:

 

LINKED ARTICLE OF REFERENCE:

 

Case Study Into the Duplicitous Nature of the Political Establishment in America | Presidential Series

Empty Promises: Obama’s Pledge Prior to His Election as the 44th President of the United States to Formally Abstain From Extended Furloughs That Would Invariably Conflict With His Duties as an Elected Official

 

The following 2 minute, 21 second cinematic excerpt is a condensed version of the original where 2008 Presidential Candidate Barack Obama discusses his life, beliefs and current events in this insightful interview conducted at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library. Here Obama touches on what he feels is a national need for a new kind of leadership, and offers solutions for such issues as the War in Iraq, the gridlock in partisan politics and the unfocused leadership in the Democratic Party.

 

US Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) discusses his new book, The Audacity of Hope, and his views on American politics with New York Times Columnist Bob Herbert.

This serves as yet another example illustrating the duplicitous nature of the current political administration, namely the acting President (Illinois Senatorial Representative and a 2008 Presidential Candidate at the time of this public speaking engagement), who, during the course of an interview with New York Times Columnist Bob Herbert makes several references to the profound level of commitment and dedication associated with the Executive Branch, the context of which, in its entirety, can be found below:

Recent Timelapse Simulations Indicate the Entirety of the Pacific Ocean Will Be Irreversibly Contaminated as a Result of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Facility Meltdown on March 11th of 2011

 

Following the collapse of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Facility on March 11, 2011, numerous field models and simulations referencing the dispersal of radioactive tracer particles from the affected area were formally constructed as an instrument of elucidation into the severity of this environmental climacteric, validating previous assessments by the scientific community regarding its devastating potential.  



The brief cinematic excerpt, as well as the animated GIF (Graphics Interchange Format file) that appear above the contents of this written exposition, are chronologically-based renditions of the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) coordinated HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) model of projection. The HYSPLIT model provides statistically rendered estimates governing the concentration of chemical dispersants at the atmospheric level.
 

 

 

The simulation below documents the continual release of Cesium-137 (Alternately classified as ¹³⁷Cs, Cs-137, Caesium-137, or radiocaesium, Cesium-137 is a radioactive isotope [Molecular variants of chemical elements exhibiting numerical irregularity with respect to the amount of neutrons present within any particular shell] of Cesium that is generated as the resultant by-product of the nuclear fission of Uranium-235) in the form of tracer particulates entering the atmosphere at a rate of 100 per hour. Each change in the coloration of such particles (red, orange, yellow, cyan, green, blue, violet, magenta) is indicative of a percentile-grade fluctuation in the affected areas cumulative radioactivity by a factor of 10. Decreases in the scope of irradiation typically occur as a result of moist or arid deposition over a particular geographical region. These measures of decomposition aren’t applicable to the lengths of duration typically ascribed to Cesium-137’s chemical half-life (A terminological composite represented as t_½ in scientific notation, defined as the time necessary to effect the decomposition of molecularly unstable atoms within an element exhibiting radioactive tendency).

 

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld Visibly Flummoxed During the Course of His Interrogation Concerning the Pentagon’s Inability to Account for $2.3 Trillion of Unspecified Funds, One Day Prior to the Tragic Events Surrounding September 11th of 2001

 

Acting Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld issues a formal proclamation to various constituencies within the general public concerning the Pentagon’s inability to account for $2.3 trillion in unspecified funds, one day prior to the tragic events surrounding September 11^th of 2001. The subsequent day the Twin Towers, as well as Building 7, collapsed amidst what appeared to be an act of terrorism staged by Al-Qaeda affiliates operating from within the periphery of the continental United States. Conveniently, the previous days headlines were effectively overshadowed by the Bush Administration's modern-day ‘crusade against evil,’ a sequence of pre-emptive military operations that later became part of an even broader campaign in the Middle East - what eventually came to be known as the ‘War on Terror.’



 

Dianne Feinstein, Senatorial Representative for the State of California, Issues Formal Proclamation Concerning the Subject of Gun Control in the United States

Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democratic Party Representative for the state of California, appearing on 60 Minutes on February 5^th, 1995 made numerous utterances referencing her desire to formally institute a ban on the sale, manufacture, and distribution of firearms in America - these formal proclamations all made despite her knowledge and understanding of the precepts governing Constitutional Law, specifically the 2^nd Amendment. 

Staunch Political Conservative and Activist Alan Keyes Issues a Formal Proclamation of Admonition With Regard to Barack Hussein Obama’s Communist Pedigree

The founder and principal author of America’s Independent Party in 2008, Alan Keyes, an individual accustomed to the subject of geopolitical discourse/ international affairs, openly debates the legitimacy of the president-elect’s assumption of executive privilege. Keyes equates policies ascribed to the current political administration with a radicalized version of communism, a philosophy predicated on the elimination of America’s national sovereignty.

Attorney General Eric Hampton Holder Discusses the Prospect of Gun Confiscation Through a Process of Subliminal Suggestion During a Public Speaking Engagement in 1995

Attorney General Eric Hampton Holder, that's right, the same Eric Holder who, in addition to being held in contempt by the House Oversight Committee, is currently facing the prospect of indictment relevant to the charge of civil contempt filed by California Congressional Representative Darrell Issa for the Fast and Furious debacle in Mexico; wants to "brainwash" the general public into acquiescing their 2nd Amendment rights as outlined within the United States Constitution. The brief cinematic excerpt above this brief introduction validates this assertion.

CNBC Reveals True Scope of Central Banking Consortium's Influence Over the Prevailing Systems of Finance

The Central Banking Consortium has achieved that which they have set out to do from the onset of their formation, the enslavement of humanity through market manipulation coinciding with the orchestrated collapse of the prevailing socio-economic exemplar. Mainstream media outlets rarely, if ever, televise such information to the general public, which makes this broadcast by CNBC all the more intriguing. 

Newt Gingrich, 2012 Republican Presidential Candidate, Openly Denies the Existence of the Bohemian Club, Equates Such Assertions to Fantasy

Newt Gingrich, the name itself lends credence to an almost innumerable host of pejorative assessments relevant to the character of this foul, priggish, loathsome, amoral serial philanderer. His extramarital dalliances well substantiated fact, Gingrich possesses a record of corruption spanning generations, as he is an avowed corporate sycophant pledging allegiance to self aggrandizement at the expense of his constituents, exhibiting an overt penchant for prevarication in the face of adversity... in short, yet another spokesman for the New World Order masquerading as an agent of beneficence. 

Leaked Pentagon Video - Influenza Vaccine Utilized as a Mechanism for Behavioral Modification

The above 5 minute 46 second visual presentation conclusively proves Influenza vaccines were not solely intended to act as an agent of catharsis relevant to the onset of illness, but rather, as a catalyst for the modification of psychological anomalies (mental illness).

Obama Questioned Regarding the Subject of the Presidential Kill Lists as Outlined Within the Parameters of the National Defense Authorization Act

The cinematic excerpt above the contents of this brief written addendum exposes yet another deliberate omission of facts relevant to the subject of the controversial Presidential Kill Lists.