capabilities as an integral component of the Executive Branch’s National Security Strategy.
A comprehensive eight-week joint military and interagency (IA) Unconventional Warfare (UW) RMT (Realistic Military Training) operation conducted in various geographical areas of distinction throughout the states of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Nevada, Utah, and Colorado; combat drills and battle simulations associated with JH 15 will encompass the date-specified parameters of July 15, 2015 to September 15, 2015. The participatory agencies involved in the implementation of the aforementioned directive are listed as follows:
United States Army Special Forces Command (Green Beret contingent)
United States Navy SEALs (SEa, Air, and Land special forces)
United States Air Force Special Operations Command
USMC Marine Special Operations Command
USMC Marine Expeditionary Units
82nd Airborne Division
Interagency Partners ˡ (DHS - Department of Homeland Security, FBI - Federal Bureau of Investigation, DoD - Department of Defense, FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency, DEA - Drug Enforcement Administration, etc.)
ˡ Interagency collaborative institutions serve as operant extensions of military services division personnel, their principal mission centered primarily on the concept of cooperative information and assessment relay between domestic law enforcement agencies and their federal constituents - oftentimes in compliance with the fulfillment of national security objectives.
DOCUMENTATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT OF INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION
Joint Publication 3-08 | Inter-Organizational Coordination During Joint Operations - 24 June 2011
Joint Publication 3-28 | Defense Support of Civil Authorities - 31 July 2013
Joint Publication 3-57 | Civil Military Operations - 11 September 2013
LOGOTYPE SIGNIFICANCE | JADE HELM 15
The logotype insignia referencing the prior stated stipulation, specifically the phrase ‘Master the Human Domain’ - that is conspicuously emblazoned beneath the JH 15 illustrative composite - is a point of reference whose scope of significance is outlined in the contents of a declassified document formulated by Lieutenant Colonel Mitchell D. Franks of the United States Army entitled USAWC (United States Army War College) Civilian Research Project | Institutionalizing Interdependence: U.S. Army Special Operations Force/ Conventional Forces “No Turning Back,” the clarification of the indicated terminological descriptor found on page 15:
USAWC (United States Army War College) CIVILIAN RESEARCH PROJECT Institutionalizing Interdependence: U.S. Army Special Operations Force/ Conventional Forces
“The human domain is the totality of the physical, cultural, and social environments that influence human behavior to the extent that success of any military operation or campaign depends on the application of unique capabilities that are designed to fight and win population-centric conflicts. It is a critical and complementary concept to the recognized domains of land, air, maritime, space, and cyberspace.”
This concept and the addition of a human domain are important because the other domains insufficiently address the human dimension of conflict, although it is deemed a critical component to land power.
Further, the addition of a human domain, similar to a 7th warfighting function ², will ensure that, “we’re providing a framework to support and employ the complementary capabilities of special operations and conventional forces.”
² The Seventh Warfighting Function is the related tasks and systems that influence the behaviors of a people, security forces, and governments.
Other interpretations of the aforementioned phrase, courtesy of Mark Phillips and INFOWARS.COM, involves the inclusion of analytical assessment as a fundamental component of the stipulated FTX (JADE HELM 15). The origin of this nomenclature coincides with the 2010 release of two documents by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (OUSDI); both of which were later compartmentalized as part of a comprehensive guidance and implementation strategy regarding the concept of Surveillance for Irregular Warfare (IW) and Understanding the Human Dimension - topics of discussion later appended to the 2014 DoDD (Department of Defense Directive) 3000.07 as a prerequisite in the enactment of policy/ delegation of responsibility in the development of capabilities addressing the national security implications of asymmetric tactical offensives. These parcels of reference inextricably bound to a relatively recent trend in government intelligence information/ data accumulation; this discipline - identified as Activity-Based Intelligence (ABI) - encompasses the following established definition:
ABI is a multi-INT (Multiple-Intelligence) approach to activity and transactional data analysis to resolve unknowns, develop object and network knowledge, and drive collection.
A more appropriate characterization of ABI outlined in the stanza below:
ABI is an analytical methodology/ system of metrics allowing for the rapid integration of data matrices from multiple agencies of intelligence pertaining to patterns of human interactivity, specifically in the scheduling of events or activities of interest, as an instrument of cyclopedic distinction in the construction of psychosocial models of behavior or tendency that aid in the prediction/ forecast of specific sequences as a theory of impetus in the creation of opportunity as a function of strategic advantage.
Initially conceived as instrumentation in the location and eventual detainment of suspected criminals or terrorists, ABI incorporates the use of five distinct elements:
1) The collation, assignation and cartographical discernment of various activities and transactions
2) Ascertainment of identity and physical location as it pertains to the authors or agencies of certain exchanges or event sequences
3) The assessment of networking capability as it applies to the concept of human interaction
4) Interpersonal diagnostics - the establishment of relationships or connections between assemblies
5) The recognition of behavioral patterns or tendencies as a tool of prognostication in the investigative process
The fifth tenet, the observance of psychosocial proclivity as a determinant factor in the classification of event sequence, allows for the formulation of strategy on the part of reconnaissance teams or units during a particular course of operation. The identification of activity as a functional component of transactual commutation evinces commonality with the notion of geo-spatial movement. Transcending cyber, social, financial and commercial boundary, ABI enables focused intelligence analysis in situations of critical importance - events whose timeline of significance is oftentimes taken into consideration in the implementation and enforcement of policy as an article of national security. Analysts adhering to the principles of this philosophy follow a prescribed set of ideals as a method of data aggregation. The first canon, “geo-reference to discover,” concerns the longitudinal/ latitudinal indexation of geographic features or localities as a measure of focus in campaigns of surveillance. The second stage of progression concerns the integration and examination of informational repositories prior to their exploitation as environmental factors. The third principle, “Data Neutrality,” refers to the potential of comparable distinction in the viability of evidence in the field of deductive reasoning. The final point of focus is often referred to as Sequence Neutrality, its underlying premise regarding ‘latency of importance’ as it pertains to the acquisition of time sensitive material contingent on the accumulation of incriminating evidence. A graphically illustrated synopsis of ABI as it pertains to the prospect of multi-agency coordinated data transference is detailed below:
The Human Domain, or Dimension, previously defined as the totality of the physical, cultural, and social milieus that influences human behavior; exists as a sensory conduit through which the observation of environmental spectra facilitates a greater degree of understanding in the realm of human interaction.
The Human Domain Analytical (HDA) Model
Devised by the OUSDI as a means of facilitating an enhanced degree of automation* in the aggregation of information by the intelligence community, the HDA Model is consistent with the application of four disparate, yet equally significant, tenets:
1 Biographical Information - “Who You Are” - Names, address listings, biometrical figures, Internet-based account information (Social media accounts, established online profiles or identities)
2 Activities - “What You Do” - Travel itineraries and histories, communications ledgers (electronic correspondence records, postal exchanges and documentation), financial transactions (credit card purchase records), and the relocation of physical assets (monetary transfers, account cancellations)
3 Relational - “Who You Know” - Family, friends, acquaintances, or organizational membership histories
4 Contextual - Demographics, cultural/ ethnic persuasion, political affiliations, religious predilections
From Mark Phillips, noted expert in the field of ABI and Human Domain Analytical Assessment Technologies:
“Taken in total, these data categories support ABI analysts in the analysis of entities, identity resolution of unknown entities, and emplacement in a social context.”
*NOTE - The synthesis of technology through human application, in that through the creation of an algorithmic-inspired network interface (massive repositories where multitudinous arrays of informational metrics are cataloged and indexed into data matrices - the National Security Agency Utah Data Center, a facility whose official capacity for data retention remains the subject of speculation - with conflicting reports by the telecommunications industry proffering assertions regarding a limitation of storage encompassing the ranged spectrum of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes [1 quintillion - bytes, the numeric equivalent of one exabyte] to 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes [1 septillion - bytes, the numeric equivalent of one yottabyte]).
The principal theme of the JH 15 emblem offers further insight into the possible intentions of its authors regarding its scope of significance. Situated conspicuously in the central portion of the graphic in question is a vector-generated image transparency featuring the inclusion of what appears to be some type of shoe. A figure, that, when examined in greater detail by prospective viewers, represents a wooden clog similar in visual composition to those worn by the residents of both Belgium and the Netherlands in accordance with the cultural traditions and customs of a geographical region along the coastal periphery of Western Europe that is oftentimes referred to as the Low Countries. The etymological distinction associated with this particular image is clarified in the following illustration:
POSSIBLE INTERPRETATIONS
An underlying reason behind the accession of this element as a symbol bearing pellucid idiosyncrasy speaks to the presence of a hidden agenda. The clog’s translucence masking the motives of its authoring assembly, casting doubt into the minds of all who would speculate its reason for existence. Using the illustrative composite appearing above this brief stanza as a tool of reference, one can better formulate a conclusion concerning the possible justification for its design and placement within the confines of the JH 15 logotype. Noting the historical implications surrounding the use of wooden clogs as a prominent fixture in the construction of the JH 15 template, one can conclude the reason for its inclusion rests with the sabotage of an, as yet, undetermined point of focus. Consider the lexiconic derivatives associated with the use of this terminology (note the use of the region’s native dialect in the figure’s exposition):
“Nou breekt mijn klomp!”
Literal translation: Now my wooden shoe breaks!
Meaning: This is said, when a sudden event or announcement occurs. It signifies a notable astonishment.
English equivalent: Well, I never! Or: Well, I’ll be damned / darned!
“Iets op de klompen (kunnen) aanvoelen”
Literal translation: (Being able) To feel something on wooden shoes.
Meaning: Something being obvious.
English equivalent: Feel it in your bones. Or: Getting knowledge from intuition.
“De klompen aan de wilgen hangen”
Literal translation: Hanging the wooden shoes to the willows.
Meaning: To stop what one has been doing.
English equivalent: To throw the helve after the hatchet. Or: Call it a day.
“Met de klompen op het ijs komen” Or:
“Met de klompen in ’t gelag komen”
Literal translation: Setting foot on ice with wooden shoes on. Or: Attending bacchanal with wooden shoes on.
Meaning: Both: Acting carelessly. Treading areas where one does not belong. Making a slip of the tongue.
English equivalent: Go beyond one’s depth.
“Op de klomp spelen”
Literal translation: Playing the wooden shoe (as in: playing the violin).
Meaning: Being abusive.
English equivalent: Fly off the handle.
“Hij staat op zijn woord als een boer op zijn klompen”
(Hij stiet op zien woord as een boer in zien klompen)
Literal translation: Standing on his word as a farmer on his wooden shoes.
Meaning: Remaining firm in one’s conviction, even if others disagree.
English equivalent: Stick to one’s guns.
“Op een klomp en een slof lopen”
Literal translation: Walking on a wooden shoe and a slipper.
Meaning: Being poor, needy.
English equivalent: Not have two pennies to rub together.
“Boter karnen in een oude klomp”
Literal translation: Churning butter in an old wooden shoe.
Meaning: Being stingy.
English equivalent: Being a cheapskate, penny pincher.
“Klompen uit dezelfde wilgen dragen”
Literal translation: Wearing wooden shoes made out of the same willows.
Meaning: Getting along; getting on well with a person.
English equivalent: To be on a friendly footing with someone.
“Iemand (van) klompzak geven”
Literal translation: Give someone klompzak (There is not an English equivalent for this word).
Meaning: Give someone a whipping.
English equivalent: Beat someone up. Or: Hit (up)on someone.
LINKED ARTICLE OF REFERENCE:
The Folkloric Significance of Wooden Clogs in Dutch Culture and Tradition
Each of these interpretations, while based on some semblance of literal translation, don’t necessarily offer a substantive degree of clarity in ascertaining the purpose for the clogs inclusion in the JH 15 montage.
ACRONYMIC DESIGNATION AND SIGNIFICANCE
A topic of rampant speculation and hypothetical conjecture, with predominantly what could be classified as the coded logistics’ surname component, ‘HELM,’ having also been interpreted as Homeland Eradication of Local Militias by numerous credible sources in independent media.
CARTOGRAPHICAL SIMILARITIES
Noted similarities exist between the geographical representation of the JADE HELM 15 sanction and the illustrative composite referencing the merger of the American Southwest with portions of Central America as a form of territorial annexation - a fact substantiated by the investigative reporting of Dave Hodges in the form of written publication. This perception of international autonomy through the coalescence of boundary ³ has been a subject of debate with organizations seeking the restoration of land claimancy in accordance with the revocation of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo - a written stipulation signed on February 2, 1848, that ceded jurisdictional authority of large portions of North America’s southwestern periphery to the United States as a means of ending the Mexican-American War (1846-1848) - under the pretense of intercultural diversification.⁴
Speculation abounds regarding these findings, with concerns of invasion by an expeditionary force of foreign paramilitary contingents widely acknowledged as a distinct possibility in the near future.
³ The concept of boundary, or the sovereign distinction of nations - in this instance the border geography separating the United States from Mexico and portions of Central America - has always been an issue of contention between rightwing conservatives and the proponents of immigration reform, with both sides of the political spectrum recognized as the active participants of one of many carefully concealed strategies devised by the Elitist Patriarchy as a means of emphasizing the necessity of ignorance in the public venue. Nowhere is this more evident than in the following revelation:
According to Timothy A. Pope, the founder, syndicated author, and investigative researcher for America the Battlefield, the concept of border autonomy regarding the existence of territorial lines of demarcation is an issue that has long since been reconciled. The written context associated with this particular discovery is as follows:
Buried within the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which came into force on January 1, 1994, is the La Paz Agreement between the United States and Mexico. This agreement was signed by Ronald Reagan in 1983 and added to NAFTA in 1997. It eliminated the U.S.-Mexico border. That’s right. It didn’t push the border back, it ELIMINATED it altogether. It’s called Border Region XXI (you know, ‘21,’ like U.N. Agenda 21 for the 21st Century), under the “Sustainable Development” initiative. Also the U.S. and Mexican border agencies were COMBINED under the NAFTA/ U.N. agreements, and similar unlawful agreements have been made under the World Trade Organization’s multilateral General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) between the United States and Canada.
More information regarding the legislative significance of the prior stated directive appears below:
The La Paz Agreement as an Instrument of Globalist Expansionism | Engineering the Eradication of Border Autonomy Between the United States, Mexico, and Portions of Central America
What the La Paz agreement did was to establish a fiefdom headed up by unelected government employees - giving them virtually unlimited power to expand their areas of responsibilities with the power to recruit an army of non-governmental organizations (NGO) to lobby for them. Essentially the areas included in the La Paz fiefdom were commandeered from the states through which it runs.
As I read this, my understanding is that the border region became a separate and independent international zone between Mexico and the U.S. Effectively, they were internationalizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with this agreement. They also provided a means to get financing outside the normal funding streams of the U.S. Congress - like from the United Nations, for example, or from private donors like David Rockefeller.
This is UN regionalization - divide and conquer. Regionalization is a cannibalizing force against representative government. It usurps power (and property in this case) from elected officials - giving it to unelected and unaccountable committees and commissions. This is the communist system of governance - appointed apparatchiks working in concert to determine and implement policy and regulations (law) by fiat. So in effect, the EPA was a Herald Patch - a cancerous seed of international communism in our country.
LINKED ARTICLES OF REFERENCE:
The La Paz Agreement as a Pathway to the Disintegration of U.S. Sovereignty at the National Level
The Militarization of Law Enforcement Agencies in Advance of Economic Collapse, Food Shortages, Civil Disobedience, and the Declaration of Martial Law
⁴ In America, the notion of intercultural diversification concerns the engineered dissolution of geographical borders and territorial boundaries, a sequence of events culminating in the terminus of national sovereignty and the actualization of a North American Technate - a regional amalgam commonly referred to as the North American Union. Numerous organizations evincing ties to this multiculturalist procession, specifically La Raza (Spanish linguistic equivalency recognized as ‘The Race’) and MECHa (Spanish linguistic equivalency recognized as Movimiento Estudiantil Chican@ de Aztlán, “Chican@ Student Movement of Aztlán," the group’s use of the ‘@’ symbolic representation indicative of gender neutral inflection), seek the establishment of a separate and autonomous extrajudicial empire in the American Southwest, presumably in accordance with the belief of Aztlán’s existence as the ancestral domicile of the Aztec civilization.
Acting under the assumed identities ‘Hispanic Homeland’ and ‘Nation of Aztlán,’ activists from the aforementioned organizations, as well as the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), are attempting to facilitate the annexation of large portions of the Southwestern United States into Mexico. Historically, these organizations have taught that the states of Colorado, California, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, Texas, and Oregon - as well as portions of Oklahoma and Washington - comprise the prior stated amalgam. These are all areas America should surrender to “La Raza” once enough immigrants, legal or illegal, enter to claim a majority, as in Los Angeles. The current borders of the United States would simply be extinguished. One of these assemblies, MECHa, incorporates the use of the following principles as part of its founding doctrine, a document known as “El Plan Espiritual de Aztlán” (Literal translation recognized as “The Spiritual Plan for Aztlán”):
“Chicano is our identity; it defines who we are as people. It rejects the notion that we should assimilate into the Anglo-American melting pot ...Aztlán was the legendary homeland of the Aztecas ...It became synonymous with the vast territories of the Southwest, brutally stolen from a Mexican people marginalized and betrayed by the hostile custodians of the Manifest Destiny.” - (Statement on University of Oregon MECHa Website, Jan. 3, 2006).
“In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud historical heritage but also of the brutal gringo invasion of our territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land of Aztlán from whence came our forefathers, reclaiming the land of their birth and consecrating the determination of our people of the sun, declare that the call of our blood is our power, our responsibility, and our inevitable destiny. ...Aztlán belongs to those who plant the seeds, water the fields, and gather the crops and not to the foreign Europeans. ...We are a bronze people with a bronze culture. Before the world, before all of North America, before all our brothers in the bronze continent, we are a nation, we are a union of free pueblos, we are Aztlán. For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada.”
The closing two-sentence stanza illustrates the intent of these organizations, for in its literal translation lies its inherent connotation: “For The Race everything. Outside The Race, nothing.”
The actualization of these particular objectives, what is commonly referred to as the “Reconquista” (Literal translation recognized as Reconquest), won’t conclude with territorial occupation and the forfeiture of state sovereignty, as its ultimate design concerns the ethnic cleansing of Americans of European, African, and Asian descent from the geographical boundaries of Aztlán - a fact evidenced in the following statement from Miguel Perez of Cal-State Northridge’s MECHa chapter:
“The ultimate ideology is the liberation of Aztlán. Communism would be closest [to it]. Once Aztlán is established, ethnic cleansing would commence: Non-Chicanos would have to be expelled -- opposition groups would be quashed because you have to keep power.”
LINKED ARTICLE OF REFERENCE:
The Truth About ‘La Raza’ and Its “Reconquista,” or Reconquest, of the Southwestern United States
Charles Truxillo, a onetime professor at the University of New Mexico and a prominent advocate of the Reconquista Movement (Link 1, Link 2 - The Reconquista, or “Reconquest,” Movement, which is also referred to as Greater Mexico, exists as the figurative characterization of the increased demographic and cultural presence of Mexicans in the American Southwest. The term’s utilization in contemporary settings was popularized by noted authors Carlos Fuentes and Elena Poniatowska, who initially intended to adopt the use of the phrase as a type of jocular analogy referencing the Spanish Reconquista of Moorish Iberia, as the areas of greatest Mexican immigration and cultural integration are conterminous with the territories the United States gained from Mexico in the 19th Century following the ratification of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. However, certain groups that identify themselves with the modern Hispanic Mexico, such as the Mexican Nationalist Front, see the losses of northern territories following the Mexican-American War as an illegitimate compromise and seek a restoration of prior established boundaries), is actively seeking the formulation of a regional construct known as “Republica del Norte” (Republic of the North), which would include the present states of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, as well as the southern periphery of Colorado.
WRITTEN ADDENDUM: The concept of a domain-specific area of regency serves two purposes:
1) The foresight of its progenitors to engineer an illusion of convenience in the perpetuation of opportunities for distraction, courses of action fostering an atmosphere conducive to the actualization of a multigenerational apartheid transcending every conceivable aspect of cultural and interpersonal attribution.
2) Recognized as a catalyst of global expansionism, it emphasizes the introduction of legislative policy as a pretext for oppressionist mandate, the ambiguous nature of its contents contributing to the misconception - and therefore the uncertainty - of the civilian population with regard to its scope of influence - oftentimes as a form of addition by subtraction, with the addition of regulatory stipulations yielding the loss of freedom and individuality.
RUMOR AND SPECULATION
WAL-MART STORES INC. | ACCOMPLICES TO TYRANNY?
Several theories referencing the involvement of one of the world’s most prominent multinational retail corporations have been widely circulated by a veritable litany of independently owned and operated telecommunications agencies. These statements of conjecture accompanying the presupposed construction of vast subterranean plexuses - labyrinthine, interconnected systems of transportation, similar in context to designs proposed by the RAND Corporation, detailing the manufacture and development of technology to be utilized in conjunction with the genesis of a transcontinental VHST (very-high-speed transit).
Often referred to as a vactrain (Vacuum Tube Train), VHST is a rail-oriented mode of navigation incorporating the use of evacuated (air-less) or partially evacuated tubes or tunnels in a magnetically inspired medium (magnetic levitation or maglev), where the application of electromagnetic force (Lorentz force) counteracts effects associated with the prospect of a gravitationally-induced means of acceleration. Mitigating the incidence of friction through the absence of air-generated currents of resistance, methods of transportation necessitating an expectation of magnetic suspension as a conduit of functionality, allow for travel exceeding velocities of 4,000 to 5,000 mph (6,400-8,000 km/h) - speeds that are 5-6 times the speed of sound (Hypersonic rates of momentum) in regions of the Earth’s atmosphere exhibiting latitudinal and longitudinal synchronicity with the parameters of sea level elevation. This particular concept having been alluded to, in both illustration, and in the following articles of reference:
LINKED ARTICLES OF REFERENCE:
Los Angeles to New York in 30 Minutes | The Proposal of a Subterranean System of Mass Transit Capable of Achieving Speeds in Excess of 10,000 MPH
The Underground High Speed Transit System
Postulations concerning the six to twelve month closure of six domestic Wal-Mart retail establishments (Facilities in Brandon, Florida; Livingston and Midland, Texas; Tulsa, Oklahoma; and Pico Rivera, California) on April 13, 2015 for purposes of sanitation - specifically issues related to plumbing and waste disposal - have ranged from acts of retaliation in response to the concerns of employees regarding the imposition of unfair labor practice and wage-related disputes (Link 1, Link 2, Link 3) to a concerted effort by the proprietary interests of the organization who, acting in compliance with DHS (Department of Homeland Security) mandate regarding the integration of large-scale business ventures with the imposition of a more comprehensive national emergency response strategy, is actively seeking the necessary funding for purposes related to the excavation of subterrestrial tunnel arteries as a method of civilian transport in the event of nuclear conflagration, biochemical weapons offensives, etc. (Link 1, Link 2), to the sinister implications of a joint operation involving the military, as well as FEMA, DoD, NSA, and DHS-coordinated contingents, in the mass incarceration of ‘subversive’ societal elements under an anti-terrorist pretense (This assumption based on the following revelation concerning an abandoned Wal-Mart facility - its rooftop expanse since decorated with razor wire in Cincinnati, Ohio - Link 1, Link 2). Other articles of reference intimating the existence of a collaborative venture between each of the aforementioned corporate and intergovernmental entities are listed accordingly:
LINKED ARTICLES OF REFERENCE:
Random Nationwide Walmart Closures Fuel Speculation Regarding the Possibility of a Corporate-Intergovernmental Agency Collaborative Venture Involving the Construction of Civilian Detention Centers Throughout the Continental United States as a Prelude to JADE HELM 15
Mass Exodus From Portions of Central and South America Prompting Agencies in the U.S. Federal Government - Specifically FEMA Acting Under the Authorization of the DoD (Department of Defense) - to Commandeer the Use of Abandoned Department Stores, Shopping Malls, and Warehouses as Temporary Migrant Detainment Facilities
JADE HELM 15: U.S. Marines Training in Preparation for the Internment of Citizens Under Martial Law
JADE HELM 15: U.S. Special Forces Contingents Actively Training With Local Law Enforcement Agencies in the Simulation of Domestic Military Operations
JADE HELM 15 AS PART OF A HIGHLY SOPHISTICATED PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE OPERATIONS CAMPAIGN DESIGNED TO GAUGE THE REACTIONS OF TARGETED SEGMENTS WITHIN THE CIVILIAN POPULATION
While it is true that there have been previous incarnations of the JADE HELM military field training exercise (FTX) under a bevy of assumed names and logistical denominations, the current adaptation is by far one of the most comprehensive of its kind, prompting an almost incalculable degree of theoretical discourse with regard to its intended purpose. One of the more noteworthy being the following assessment - a brief, albeit compelling argument, by Jay Dyer (Independent researcher, accredited author, public speaker, and founder of Jay’s Analysis - an exceptionally rendered forum of discussion covering a wide array of topics, a definitive measure of focus being assigned to philosophy and its impact on the prevailing societal metric, the role of the Entertainment Industry through its publication of full length feature films to shape public opinion, geopolitical events, and theological discourse):
The possibility exists, however remote in the minds of those who would seek to assign some inherently grandiose degree of significance to the JH 15 FTX, that the exercise itself is part of a wide-ranging intergovernmental psychological warfare operations campaign designed to gauge the reactions of targeted audiences within the civilian population as a form of programmatically-inspired prognostication. The author of the aforementioned article of reference cites the possibility of the exercise’s commencement, specifically the events precipitating it, being identified as a multifaceted extension of game theory (the application of game-relevant theory as the inspiration for the initiative gains a measure of credence in light of the operation’s logistical code name being a prominent fixture in the Diablo III: Reaper of Souls entertainment franchise) and algorithmic surveillance where the designs progenitors can effectively observe societal trend and interaction as a basis for the establishment of military praxis.
JH 15, SPECIFICALLY THE ‘JADE’ ACRONYMIC DESIGNATION, AS A MULTIFACETED EXTENSION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE QUANTUM COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY
The idea that JADE HELM 15, is, in actuality, a separatist endeavor combining the prospect of technological innovationism with established military protocol may seem beyond the realm of possibility; however, as the author in the following article alludes to, this particular discovery may have some degree of merit.
“JADE” is an AI (Artificial Intelligence) quantum computing technology capable of producing holographic battlefield simulations. Through the acquisition of data-indexed informational repositories (stores of information made available through a myriad host of intergovernmental agencies and their corporate affiliates, most notably MAIN CORE, the ADEX List, CODIS, and the National Security Agency Utah Data Center) counterintelligence organizations are able to recreate systems of terrain endemic to geographic regions whose population densities would serve as a tool of reference in the identification and elimination of targeted audiences meriting ‘extremist’ classification. This system recognized as an indispensable component in the DoD’s - with the assistance of BBN (Bolt, Beranek and Newman) Technologies (A research and development center of the Raytheon Company) in conjunction with DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) - formulation of a Global Information Grid as an evolutionary prerequisite in the manufacture of Network Centric Warfare conducive environments.
~ Paraphrased documentation from SCOOP FEED courtesy of Level9News.
CONCLUSION: There are an innumerable host of interpretations relevant to the subject of JH 15, one of the most notable being the following statement from Dave Hodges, syndicated author and investigative journalist of ‘The Common Sense Show':
“Jade Helm is a dissident extraction drill involving members of special forces who are practicing infiltration techniques. And it’s also a martial law drill… All military activity is falling under the purview of Jade Helm.”
Expounding on the proffered explanation, taking into account the information presented in earlier portions of this particular entry, one comes to the following conclusion:
JH 15 is a government-sanctioned, interagency-coordinated, plan of contingency involving the detainment and strategic relocation of ‘subversive’ elements in the civilian population as a means of preserving the national interest through the continuity of governance.
The notion of seditionist agencies operating within the domestic periphery of the United States is a topic of contention that has been well documented in a plethora of Federal Government/ Military Service Branch training manuals, a fact evident in the following:
AFSS 0910 (Air Force Security Services 0910) | Equal Opportunity and Treatment Incidents (EOTI)
MIAC (Missouri Information Analysis Center) Strategic Report of 02/20/09 | The Modern Militia Movement - Identifying the Potential Sponsors of Domestic Terrorist Networks in the United States (72 Types of Americans Exhibiting the Potential to Engage in Acts of Domestic Terror*)
*This subject pertains to the above documentation, with noted emphasis on the following listing:
1. Persons emphasizing the importance of “individual liberties”
2. Individuals advocating the preservation of state sovereignty as it pertains to the right of said states to possess autonomy from Federal Government regulation in the imposition of law
3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”
4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”
7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”
8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”
10. Opponents of Same-Sex Marriage/ Civil Unions
11. “Anti-Immigrant”
12. “Anti-Muslim”
13. “The Patriot Movement”
14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
15. Members of the Family Research Council
16. Members of the American Family Association
17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union'”
18. Members of the American Border Patrol/ American Patrol
19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
21. Members of the Christian Action Network
22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
23. Conspiracy Theorists
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscation”
27. The militia movement
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”
33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/ blogs”
34. Anyone that “establishes website/ blog to display extremist views”
35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
40. “Militia or unorganized militia”
41. “General right-wing extremist”
42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”
44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
45. Those that are “anti-global”
46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/ or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
58. “Right-wing extremists”
59. “Returning veterans”
60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”
63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
64. “Anti-abortion activists”
65. Those that are against illegal immigration
66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)
71. Those that believe in “End Times” prophecies
72. Evangelical Christians
The groups of people in the list above are considered “problems” that need to be dealt with. In accordance with the documentation and instructional information present within the AFSS 0910 (Air Force Security Services 0910) Lesson Plan, as well as the MIAC* (Missouri Information Analysis Center) Strategic Report of 02/20/09, members of the military are expressly forbidden in engaging in conversation with, or associating with, individuals or organizations espousing similar philosophical ideologies. It is logical to assume, in light of these documents, that such persons would be closely monitored by constituencies within the Federal Government, and, in the event of martial law declaration, placed in FEMA-coordinated internment camps and detainment facilities.
NOTE* - It is important to note that the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) is one of 72 FEMA/ DHS-coordinated (Federal Emergency Management Agency/ Department of Homeland Security-coordinated) Fusion Centers⁵ located across the continental United States, the Pacific Regional Information Clearinghouse in Honolulu, Hawaii being the lone exception - with other facilities rumored to be slated for construction beyond the nationally acknowledged periphery, presumably in geographic territories and municipalities operating under U.S. jurisdictional authority (Guam, Puerto Rico).
⁵ Fusion Centers are information distribution and data transference facilities, jointly created between the years of 2003 and 2007 under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as well as the Office of Justice Programs in the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ). Designed to promote the integration of collected data stores at the Federal level, specifically the dissemination of intelligence at the intergovernmental tier of organization, oftentimes between the following agencies: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), U.S. Department of Justice, Military Service Branches, state and local law enforcement. In the event of Martial Law declaration these Fusion Centers will assume the principal mantle of authority in the administration of regulation and procedural decree within each designated area of detainment.
The authors of the prior stated directive, emboldened by the ignorance of the general public, seek the inclusion of the following documents into a type of legislative gestalt designed to aid certain interagency factions within the Federal Government in the fulfillment of priorities pertaining to the establishment of an internationally (UN - United Nations-directed) accredited coalition of disarmament and weapons confiscation as an instrumental component in the pacification of ‘extremist’ contingents within the United States.
DOCUMENTATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT OF WEAPONS CONFISCATION AS AN ESSENTIAL PREREQUISITE IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S STRATEGY TO IDENTIFY EXTREMIST SEGMENTS OF THE POPULATION AS THE PROGENITORS OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM
AFSS 0910 (Air Force Security Services 0910) | Equal Opportunity and Treatment Incidents (EOTI)
MIAC (Missouri Information Analysis Center) Strategic Report of 02/20/09 | The Modern Militia Movement - Identifying the Potential Sponsors of Domestic Terrorist Networks in the United States (72 Types of Americans Exhibiting the Potential to Engage in Acts of Domestic Terror*)
*This subject pertains to the above documentation, with noted emphasis on the following listing:
1. Persons emphasizing the importance of “individual liberties”
2. Individuals advocating the preservation of state sovereignty as it pertains to the right of said states to possess autonomy from Federal Government regulation in the imposition of law
3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”
4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”
7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”
8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”
10. Opponents of Same-Sex Marriage/ Civil Unions
11. “Anti-Immigrant”
12. “Anti-Muslim”
13. “The Patriot Movement”
14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
15. Members of the Family Research Council
16. Members of the American Family Association
17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union'”
18. Members of the American Border Patrol/ American Patrol
19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
21. Members of the Christian Action Network
22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
23. Conspiracy Theorists
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscation”
27. The militia movement
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”
33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/ blogs”
34. Anyone that “establishes website/ blog to display extremist views”
35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
40. “Militia or unorganized militia”
41. “General right-wing extremist”
42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”
44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
45. Those that are “anti-global”
46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/ or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
58. “Right-wing extremists”
59. “Returning veterans”
60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”
63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
64. “Anti-abortion activists”
65. Those that are against illegal immigration
66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)
71. Those that believe in “End Times” prophecies
72. Evangelical Christians
The groups of people in the list above are considered “problems” that need to be dealt with. In accordance with the documentation and instructional information present within the AFSS 0910 (Air Force Security Services 0910) Lesson Plan, as well as the MIAC* (Missouri Information Analysis Center) Strategic Report of 02/20/09, members of the military are expressly forbidden in engaging in conversation with, or associating with, individuals or organizations espousing similar philosophical ideologies. It is logical to assume, in light of these documents, that such persons would be closely monitored by constituencies within the Federal Government, and, in the event of martial law declaration, placed in FEMA-coordinated internment camps and detainment facilities.
NOTE* - It is important to note that the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) is one of 72 FEMA/ DHS-coordinated (Federal Emergency Management Agency/ Department of Homeland Security-coordinated) Fusion Centers⁵ located across the continental United States, the Pacific Regional Information Clearinghouse in Honolulu, Hawaii being the lone exception - with other facilities rumored to be slated for construction beyond the nationally acknowledged periphery, presumably in geographic territories and municipalities operating under U.S. jurisdictional authority (Guam, Puerto Rico).
⁵ Fusion Centers are information distribution and data transference facilities, jointly created between the years of 2003 and 2007 under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as well as the Office of Justice Programs in the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ). Designed to promote the integration of collected data stores at the Federal level, specifically the dissemination of intelligence at the intergovernmental tier of organization, oftentimes between the following agencies: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), U.S. Department of Justice, Military Service Branches, state and local law enforcement. In the event of Martial Law declaration these Fusion Centers will assume the principal mantle of authority in the administration of regulation and procedural decree within each designated area of detainment.
DOCUMENTATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT OF WEAPONS CONFISCATION AS AN ESSENTIAL PREREQUISITE IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S STRATEGY TO IDENTIFY EXTREMIST SEGMENTS OF THE POPULATION AS THE PROGENITORS OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM
FREEDOM FROM WAR | THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD
APPENDED LINKS
U.S. ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY PUBLICATION 4 | Blue Print For The Peace Race
Outline of Basic Provisions of a Treaty on General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World
United Nations | Disarmament - A Basic Guide | 09-40271 — August 2009
DHS (Department of Homeland Security) Assessment (U//FOUO) Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment
Taking into account the theories associated with the operation’s scope and purpose, it is logical to assume that JH 15 may, in reality, be a combination of each; therefore, any assertions to the contrary would have disastrous implications for those seeking to dismiss such claims as the by-products of an overactive imagination.
See my web site--at "SKYTRAINZASTRON"---UFO--Research--look in photo gallery--title--On The Rail's--I suggest that Earth experienced what it felt was a deliberate "incursion" by a fleet of astro-vessel's from an "alien" realm---a thousand year's ago-(has nothing to do with a thousand year" Reich",in my view--it would all be a mysterious technical cybersystem interaction if it were so--nothing personal)--Derelict distant solar system orbiting automatonic vessels continued to send data ever since---no living human occupant's remained aboard following an altercation--all became captive denizen's of Earth--consider this "speculative"
ReplyDeleteSky for astronaut's--any "Avian" being--train for the railway's-(serpent or "snake")--"zastron"-for astronautic disaster--
Alien's and the Alienist-(psychiatrist)---askylum-----or,ask the asylumner---deep yota data-------limit's to all thing's technical--time-energy-material--etc.-delusion percieve's no limit's--as much as we may dream of such--it is not--
b7jk9w@toast.net--
Interesting page, I believe, and correct me if I'm wrong, that Zastron is a small agricultural municipality located in the Free State province of South Africa. The Eye of Zastron, an as yet unexplained geological anomaly present within the structural confines of Aasvoëlberg (Vulture Mountain) known as Die Oog by the town's residents, was adopted as the unofficial emblem of a cartographical locality founded in 1876.
ReplyDeleteThe notion of alien visitation, while plausible to many experts in the field of ufology, may be more closely related to the phenomena of multidimensional or multivariate interpolation - where the spatial boundaries governing a predefined set of coordinates within the space-time continuum are effectively transcended. This type of experimentation is being conducted at CERN, where researchers and atomic physicists continue to work in unison to delve into the mysteries surrounding the potential consequences of antimatter release into the natural realm of existence.
Michael Reign--i appreciate the good description of the town or village of "Zastron"---The "Cern" item is another thing---that could relate to my theory of a malfunctioning "actual transmatter beam" aboard or vessel's of a "derelict fleet"-now being what we may understand as "artificial Intelligence"(in part)The astro fleet---a "Bird"--the human pesonnel contained in the Bird" mind--etc.--Extraterrestrial Influence--
ReplyDeletenoe--The subterranean railway--possibly existed on another planet--delivered by the fleet to Earth now--it was a "hiden subliminal" metaphor in past socila conflict----with modern extraterresrtrial engineering it may be developing into a tangible reality--(Spacecraft--a text about alien craft--(fiction---then)??-1978--depict's a 1500 mph railway underground---on 3 rail's--suspended within the tunnel--)
ReplyDeletej-h--humpty-dumpty sat on a wall---you know the "rest of the story"--
ReplyDelete