Project Rainbow

A collaborative military venture orchestrated through the machinations of various intergovernmental agencies in the early vestiges of the 1940’s as a precursor to the development of ‘stealth’ technology. The fundamental premise governing the initiative’s implementation centered around the manipulation of the prevailing electromagnetic spectrum through the genesis of artificial fields of energy. The Philadelphia Experiment (Link 1, Link 2, Link 3) is widely regarded as the culmination of this particular directive; characterized as a series of controlled tests involving the application of Einstein’s Unified Field Theory (Link 1, Link 2).


Written synopsis governing the fundamental tenets and application of principle in accordance with Einstein’s Unified Field Theory

as a prelude to the development of technologies capable of allowing for the creation of an artificially induced portal of entry in spacetime that would, in theory, effect the transport of certain objects and/ or individuals from one undisclosed location to another - a process oftentimes referred to as ‘teleportation.’
Postulations - many of which are too numerous to accurately account for - have been proffered by many with regard to the actual purpose of these types of technologies, their development, as well as the existence of any subsequent experiments incorporating the use electromagnetic fields as elements of a 4-dimensional ˡ canvas.

ˡ Aspects pertaining to the subject of four-dimensional constructs similar in context to the tesseract² are contingent on the inclusion of scientific principle pertaining to the Minkowski Thesis.

² The term, ‘tesseract,’ serves as a point of reference for a geometrically-oriented cuboidal analog that occupies space in four disparate regions bound together by the coterminous nature of its adjoining line segments in a Cartesian-based system of coordinates. In the realm of theoretical physics the tesseract is recognized as a hypothetically-contrived transdimensional conduit whereby the distance between two points in the sequence of space and time is effectively negated by the introduction of an unknown variable. It is believed by many within the scientific community that the fundamental precepts governing the concept of time travel in a spatial vacuum are addressed through the introduction of these types of figures as articles of explanation for the manifestation of wormholes.

Figure 1. The evolution of the tesseract as a four-dimensional analog from an arbitrary element of locality on a Cartesian-based system of coordinates.
³ A set of principles that attempt to reconcile the mathematically predetermined relationship of Euclidean Space as a geometrically-inspired function of time whereby the incidence of two diametrically opposed events operate independently of the inertial frame of reference from which they have been accounted for in a chronological sense.  

CONCLUSION: U.S. Naval Intelligence Agencies have sought to downplay the significance of this project on two separate occasions, each of which is highlighted by their denial of the operation’s existence, a fact evident in the following statements:

Official Comments from the DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY -- NAVAL HISTORICAL CENTER

Over the years, the Navy has received innumerable queries about the so-called “Philadelphia Experiment” or “Project” and the alleged role of the Office of Naval Research (ONR) in it. The majority of these inquiries are directed to the Office of Naval Research or to the Fourth Naval District in Philadelphia. The frequency of these queries predictably intensifies each time the experiment is mentioned by the popular press, often in a science fiction book.

The genesis of the Philadelphia Experiment myth dates back to 1955 with the publication of The Case for UFO’s by the late Morris K. Jessup.

Some time after the publication of the book, Jessup received correspondence from a Carlos Miquel Allende, who gave his address as R.D. #1, Box 223, New Kensington, Pa. In his correspondence, Allende commented on Jessup’s book and gave details of an alleged secret naval experiment conducted by the Navy in Philadelphia in 1943. During the experiment, according to Allende, a ship was rendered invisible and teleported to and from Norfolk in a few minutes, with some terrible after-effects for crew members. Supposedly, this incredible feat was accomplished by applying Einstein’s “unified field” theory. Allende claimed that he had witnessed the experiment from another ship and that the incident was reported in a Philadelphia newspaper. The identity of the newspaper has never been established. Similarly, the identity of Allende is unknown, and no information exists on his present address.

In 1956 a copy of Jessup's book was mailed anonymously to ONR. The pages of the book were interspersed with hand-written comments which alleged a knowledge of UFO’s, their means of motion, the culture and ethos of the beings occupying these UFO’s, described in pseudo-scientific and incoherent terms.

Two officers, then assigned to ONR, took a personal interest in the book and showed it to Jessup. Jessup concluded that the writer of those comments on his book was the same person who had written him about the Philadelphia Experiment. These two officers personally had the book retyped and arranged for the reprint, in typewritten form, of 25 copies. The officers and their personal belongings have left ONR many years ago, and ONR does not have a file copy of the annotated book.

Personnel at the Fourth Naval District believe that the questions surrounding the so-called "Philadelphia Experiment" arise from quite routine research which occurred during World War II at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard. Until recently, it was believed that the foundation for the apocryphal stories arose from degaussing experiments which have the effect of making a ship undetectable or “invisible” to magnetic mines. Another likely genesis of the bizarre stories about levitation, teleportation and effects on human crew members might be attributed to experiments with the generating plant of a destroyer, the USS Timmerman. In the 1950’s this ship was part of an experiment to test the effects of a small, high-frequency generator providing l,000 hz instead of the standard 400hz. The higher frequency generator produced corona discharges, and other well known phenomena associated with high frequency generators. None of the crew suffered effects from the experiment.

ONR has never conducted any investigations on invisibility, either in 1943 or at any other time (ONR was established in 1946.) In view of present scientific knowledge, ONR scientists do not believe that such an experiment could be possible except in the realm of science fiction.

08 September 1996

SOURCE: http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq21-2.htm

Allegedly, in the fall of 1943 a U.S. Navy destroyer was made invisible and teleported from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Norfolk, Virginia, in an incident known as the Philadelphia Experiment. Records in the Operational Archives Branch of the Naval Historical Center have been repeatedly searched, but no documents have been located which confirm the event, or any interest by the Navy in attempting such an achievement.

The ship involved in the experiment was supposedly the USS Eldridge. Operational Archives has reviewed the deck log and war diary from Eldridge’s commissioning on 27 August 1943 at the New York Navy Yard through December 1943. The following description of Eldridge's activities are summarized from the ship's war diary. After commissioning, Eldridge remained in New York and in the Long Island Sound until 16 September when it sailed to Bermuda. From 18 September, the ship was in the vicinity of Bermuda undergoing training and sea trials until 15 October when Eldridge left in a convoy for New York where the convoy entered on 18 October. Eldridge remained in New York harbor until 1 November when it was part of the escort for Convoy UGS-23 (New York Section). On 2 November the convoy entered Naval Operating Base, Norfolk. On 3 November, Eldridge and Convoy UGS-23 left for Casablanca where it arrived on 22 November. On 29 November, Eldridge left as one of escorts for Convoy GUS-22 and arrived with the convoy on 17 December at New York harbor. Eldridge remained in New York on availability training and in Block Island Sound until 31 December when it steamed to Norfolk with four other ships. During this time frame, Eldridge was never in Philadelphia.

Eldridge's complete World War II action report and war diary coverage, including the remarks section of the 1943 deck log, is available on microfilm, NRS-1978-26. The cost of a duplicate film is indicated on the fee schedule. To order a duplicate film, please complete the duplication order form and send a check or money order for the correct amount as indicated on the NHC fee schedule, made payable to the Department of the Navy, to the Operational Archives, at the above address.

Supposedly, the crew of the civilian merchant ship SS Andrew Furuseth observed the arrival via teleportation of the Eldridge into the Norfolk area. Andrew Furuseth’s movement report cards are in the Tenth Fleet records in the custody of the Modern Military Branch, National Archives and Records Administration, (8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001), which also has custody of the action reports, war diaries and deck logs of all World War II Navy ships, including Eldridge. The movement report cards list the merchant ship's ports of call, the dates of the visit, and convoy designation, if any. The movement report card shows that Andrew Furuseth left Norfolk with Convoy UGS-15 on 16 August 1943 and arrived at Casablanca on 2 September. The ship left Casablanca on 19 September and arrived off Cape Henry on 4 October. Andrew Furuseth left Norfolk with Convoy UGS-22 on 25 October and arrived at Oran on 12 November. The ship remained in the Mediterranean until it returned with Convoy GUS-25 to Hampton Roads on 17 January 1944. The Archives has a letter from Lieutenant Junior Grade William S. Dodge, USNR, (Ret.), the Master of Andrew Furuseth in 1943, categorically denying that he or his crew observed any unusual event while in Norfolk. Eldridge and Andrew Furuseth were not even in Norfolk at the same time.

The Office of Naval Research (ONR) has stated that the use of force fields to make a ship and her crew invisible does not conform to known physical laws. ONR also claims that Dr. Albert Einstein's Unified Field Theory was never completed. During 1943-1944, Einstein was a part-time consultant with the Navy’s Bureau of Ordnance, undertaking theoretical research on explosives and explosions. There is no indication that Einstein was involved in research relevant to invisibility or to teleportation. ONR’s information sheet on the Philadelphia Experiment is attached.

The Philadelphia Experiment has also been called “Project Rainbow.” A comprehensive search of the Archives has failed to identify records of a Project Rainbow relating to teleportation or making a ship disappear. In the 1940s, the code name RAINBOW was used to refer to the Rome-Berlin-Tokyo Axis. The RAINBOW plans were the war plans to defeat Italy, Germany and Japan. RAINBOW V, the plan in effect on 7 December 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, was the plan the U.S. used to fight the Axis powers.

Some researchers have erroneously concluded that degaussing has a connection with making an object invisible. Degaussing is a process in which a system of electrical cables are installed around the circumference of ship’s hull, running from bow to stern on both sides. A measured electrical current is passed through these cables to cancel out the ship's magnetic field. Degaussing equipment was installed in the hull of Navy ships and could be turned on whenever the ship was in waters that might contain magnetic mines, usually shallow waters in combat areas. It could be said that degaussing, correctly done, makes a ship “invisible” to the sensors of magnetic mines, but the ship remains visible to the human eye, radar, and underwater listening devices.

After many years of searching, the staff of the Operational Archives and independent researchers have not located any official documents that support the assertion that an invisibility or teleportation experiment involving a Navy ship occurred at Philadelphia or any other location.

28 November 2000

SOURCE: http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq21-1.htm

NOTE - Each of the links from which these statements where initially obtained have since been stricken from official record.

The exact nature of the experiments that were conducted by members of U.S. Naval Intelligence on October 28, 1943 remain shrouded in mystery, and with the mere mention of their existence being open to interpretation one can conclude, that, like many other militarily executed operations that the Federal Government claims are the subject of ‘outlandish conspiracy theory,’ 

Figure 2. The casual dismissal of what is oftentimes deemed to be conspiratorial conjecture is not so easily disregarded when paired with the actual quotes of one of the Federal Government’s most esteemed luminaries in the field of avionics.

the truth of PROJECT RAINBOW may never be fully revealed to the general public.

JADE HELM 15 (JH 15 | Joint Assistance for Deployment and Execution Holding ELeMent 2015) | Theory and Speculation Regarding the Role of the Federal Government in the Implementation of Military Field Operations and Directives

JADE HELM 15 (JH 15) is a USSOCOM (United States Special Operations Command) coordinated field training exercise (FTX) designed to improve Special Operations’ Unconventional Warfare (UW) (Link 1, Link 2, Link 3)

Military Field Manual 3-05.130 | Army Special Operations Forces Unconventional Warfare 

Training Circular 18-01 | Special Forces Unconventional Warfare - November 2010

capabilities as an integral component of the Executive Branch’s National Security Strategy.

National Security Strategy | Calendar Year 2015

A comprehensive eight-week joint military and interagency (IA) Unconventional Warfare (UW) RMT (Realistic Military Training) operation conducted in various geographical areas of distinction throughout the states of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Nevada, Utah, and Colorado; combat drills and battle simulations associated with JH 15 will encompass the date-specified parameters of July 15, 2015 to September 15, 2015. The participatory agencies involved in the implementation of the aforementioned directive are listed as follows:

United States Army Special Forces Command (Green Beret contingent)
United States Navy SEALs (SEa, Air, and Land special forces)
United States Air Force Special Operations Command
USMC Marine Special Operations Command
USMC Marine Expeditionary Units
82^nd Airborne Division
Interagency Partners ˡ (DHS - Department of Homeland Security, FBI - Federal Bureau of Investigation, DoD - Department of Defense, FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency, DEA - Drug Enforcement Administration, etc.)

ˡ Interagency collaborative institutions serve as operant extensions of military services division personnel, their principal mission centered primarily on the concept of cooperative information and assessment relay between domestic law enforcement agencies and their federal constituents - oftentimes in compliance with the fulfillment of national security objectives.

DOCUMENTATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT OF INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION

Joint Publication 3-08 | Inter-Organizational Coordination During Joint Operations - 24 June 2011
Joint Publication 3-28 | Defense Support of Civil Authorities - 31 July 2013
Joint Publication 3-57 | Civil Military Operations - 11 September 2013

Threat Matrix

An electronically transcribed counterintelligence and antiterrorist information and assessment network that originated in Pakistan in 2011 under the political regime of then Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani; the development of the program coincided with the Pakistani government’s renewed sense of focus and commitment in the evaluation of perceived internal and external threats challenging the nation’s security. The database gauges the operational priorities of the military, pairing these findings with statistical probability and mathematically engendered algorithms emphasizing threat potential. Several nondescript variants of the aforementioned topology were later adopted by a myriad of interagency contingents within the U.S. Federal Government under the guise of cyber protectionism. These antecedent incarnations of the prior stated provision were eventually integrated into a more comprehensive system incorporating the use of metrically deduced arrays - numeric indices later assigned a degree of intrinsic value based on the observable activities¹ of certain groups or individuals deemed hazardous to the continuity of governance.

CODIS (Combined DNA Index System)

The acknowledged successor to the TWGDAM (Technical Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods, its current status/ identity synonymous with the SWGDAM acronymic equivalency - In 2014 the various SWGs, also known as Scientific Working Groups, experienced an organizational restructuralization, with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, known collectively as NIST, commandeering the projects development. These findings evident in the following link: NIST OSAC - Organization For Scientific Area Committees - Hierarchal Structure) initiative, an intergovernmentally sanctioned standards of operation review committee tasked with the design and implementation of administrative tenets governing practice and application of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) test simulations in crime laboratories throughout North America (Primarily in Canada and the United States) during the latter portions of the 1980s. Sponsored by the FBI Laboratory, an interadministrative extension of the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation occupying the role of forensic analysis support and information services provider (This judicially inspired appendage recognized as a consultation/ assistance firm of the FBI, as well as to state and local law enforcement agencies throughout the cartographical periphery of both Canada and the United States), TWGDAM representatives formulated the completion of a white paper assessment in October 1989 detailing the design and concept of an electronically generated storage repository/ database registry capable of housing, and eventually facilitating the distribution of DNA/ genome-specific sequence configurations to crime laboratories, a system similar in context to the automated fingerprint identification programs that were so prevalent during the 1980s.
The DNA Identification Act of 1994, specifically 42 U.S.C. §14132, authorized the creation of a National DNA Index (NDIS), the most recent aggregate compilation listed as follows:

MonsterMind | Autonomous Cyber Weapons Delivery System of the National Security Agency

 

In recent syndicated press releases by Edward Snowden, revelations concerning the existence of an autonomous cyber weapons apparatus, an interconnected digital network currently in its initial stages of development that is owned and operated by the National Security Agency (NSA), have been brought out into the open. MonsterMind, a taxpayer funded contrivance possessing the inherent capability of intercepting all electronically generated communications within the continental United States; with its principal function recognized as a heightened threat assessment and detection delivery system - its programmatically rendered instruction allowing for the execution of retaliatory strikes in advance of perceived hostility, a process devoid of human interaction or third-party interference.

During the interview Snowden explained a previously unrevealed NSA cyber weapon called “MonsterMind,” which has the capability to detect incoming cyber attacks and retaliate automatically without any human supervision. Such a program has dangerous global reactionary implications, according to Snowden, who said such cyber-attacks are often routed through computers inside innocent and unsuspecting third-party countries.
“These attacks can be spoofed,” Snowden said. “You could have someone sitting in China, for example, making it appear that one of these attacks is originating in Russia. And then we end up shooting back at a Russian hospital. What happens next?”
Beyond the possibility of mutually assured cyber-destruction, Snowden explained that for the weapon to work, the signals intelligence agency would have to compromise the privacy of “virtually all private communications coming in from overseas to people in the U.S.”
“The argument is that the only way we can identify these malicious traffic flows and respond to them is if we’re analyzing all traffic flows,” Snowden said. ”And if we’re analyzing all traffic flows, that means we have to be intercepting all traffic flows. That means violating the Fourth Amendment, seizing private communications without a warrant, without probable cause or even a suspicion of wrongdoing. For everyone, all the time.”

Following the release of these statements by Edward Snowden, the following hypothetical postulation proffered by Mac Slavo of SHTFplan.com becomes a distinct possibility:

Say the Chinese wanted to have the Russians do their bidding, and we realize that this is a hypothetical scenario too, because no country, especially China, would ever consider such a manipulation. But if they did, the same Chinese hackers who compromised some of America’s most secure systems could simply spoof an attack on U.S. stock markets to make it look like they came from Russia. The autonomous MonsterMind system could intercept the attack and retaliate in any number of ways, including a retaliatory economic strike or something worse, like taking down Russia’s power grid.

In such an instance, the response from Russia could very easily go off-line and lead to real-world conflict, involving actual human beings getting deleted and not just computer systems.

CONCLUSION: Proponents for the development of these types of weapons defense systems tend to overstate their importance and underestimate the threat their implementation in a conventional setting portends to the civilian population. MonsterMind’s creation then, is yet another instance where the Federal Government can, and oftentimes, actively engages in clandestine surveillance campaigns against its own citizenry at their expense - a sequence of events that, should conjecture hold sway over reality, would engineer its own consequence.

SOURCE ARTICLE/ REGISTRY LINK:

MonsterMind | The Real Skynet: New NSA Autonomous Weapons System Intercepts Threats and Retaliates Automatically, by Mac Slavo  

Conficker

 

Conficker is a computer worm that has been steadily infecting an innumerable host of servers/ networks via the Internet since November 2008. With little to nothing conclusively known relevant to its inherent purpose, Conficker is rapidly metastasizing in its scope of influence; corrupting vast armadas of digital tessellation. Machines adversely affected with this worm are surreptitiously manipulated by an, as yet, unknown contingent charged with its creation. With the exception of isolated instances of malware (A portmanteau incorporating the use of two words: malicious and software) propagation through various ports of entry granting prospective users Internet accessibility, Conficker, for the most part, remains in a state of dormancy. Its genesis predicated on the presence of an obfuscated/ labyrinthine coded sequence masquerading as a legitimate system process, Conficker lurks beneath an interwoven tapestry of peer-to-peer media utilities; actively evading the most sophisticated network filtering agencies through a seemingly unpredictable array of updates (protocol pertinent to the updating process is similar in context to pathogenic mutation through acquired immunity).
Conficker itself may be representative of a massive campaign, orchestrated by the United States government and various corporate-level intermediary constituencies, to facilitate the enactment of a substantive virtual false flag initiative. With the passage of the S. 3480 - PCNAA (Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act) legislation the Federal Government could, in effect, grant the Executive Branch absolute dominion over every conceivable arena of Internet communication emanating from the continental United States. Utilizing the pretense of cyber-security relative to Conficker’s emergence in the virtual world, substantive network restrictions (mandated censorship of various content deemed contrary to the national interest, restricted domain registry access, intermittent patterns of connectivity or engineered instances of communications signal disruptions, etc.) could then be enacted and strictly enforced under penalty of law. The new Internet, quite possibly what has come to be colloquialized as Internet2 (Despite claims deemed contrary to a purpose of beneficence by those responsible for its inception, Internet2 exists as a federalized alternative to its present day counterpart. A non-profit U.S. networking consortium coordinated/ maintained by the most accredited members of research and academia, as well as representatives of industry and government; Internet2 operates under a dynamic circuit network [DCN] strictly regulated by its progenitors within the scientific community), could then be implemented through legislative edict, nullifying the freedom of expression of prospective users amidst an inexhaustible morass of intergovernmental regulation. Conficker then, exists to facilitate the authoritarian suppression of personal autonomy under the pretense of national security, a perfect cyber-mirroring of the “anti-terrorist” legislative mandate so oftentimes imposed throughout the last decade.
The progenitors of Conficker will be revealed as authoritarian ideologues exhibiting a symbiotic relationship with the convoluted process of Conficker’s path of destruction.

SOURCE ARTICLE/ REGISTRY LINK:

Conficker, Cyber-Protectionism, and the Internet Kill Switch by Kai Tischen

Project Stormfury

In the earliest vestiges of 1962, US government research facilities as well as Federal constituencies operating within the scientific community, sought the creation of technology to be used as an instrument of weather system modification under the Project Stormfury codenamed derivative. The principal objective pursuant to the enactment of this initiative entailed the alteration of weather patterns found to be endemic to the gestation of tropical disturbances as well as their aggregate intensities.

Senate Bill 510 - S. 510/ House Resolution 2751 - HR 2751

 

Senate Bill 510 - S. 510/ House Resolution 2751 - HR 2751, legislative agnomen also identified as the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010, attained precedence in the early portion of the 1990s during the presidency of William Jefferson Clinton. It was at this juncture that the principal nuances apropos to the creation of such a Federal mandate were generated under a false pretense of beneficence to prospective consumers of meat and poultry within the purlieus of the continental United States. Clinton introduced a government coordinated measure known as the HACCP (Hazardous Analysis Critical Control Points) to purportedly curtail the incidence of contamination within the meat and poultry industry. HACCP itself later became synonymous with widespread occurrences of contagions and pathogenic agents attaining a marked increase in incidence within the correspondent food supply of the aforementioned corporate entities, due, in large part, to the presence of legal stipulations enacted within the measure allowing such institutions to regulate inspection procedures through a varying degree of fiscal intermediaries and corporate-level constituencies. The Monsanto Company, a United States based multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation, actively promoted the passage of numerous legislative protocols in direct correlation with HACCP.
In 2008, Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton urged the formulation of a powerful Federally coordinated and centralized food safety agency as a means of garnering support for her political campaign to acquire Executive Office. Her subsequent advisor, Mark Penn, CEO of Burson Marsteller, a massive Public Relations firm; acted as a litigational intermediary for the Monsanto conglomerate. Stanley Bernard Greenberg, husband of Rosa L. DeLauro (Currently the U.S. Representative for Connecticut’s 3^rd Congressional District and an openly liberal advocate of Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton during her 2008 presidential campaign) - political advisor and strategist to numerous luminaries within the prevailing American and European sociopolitical spectrum, also serves as an active representative of the Monsanto Company. The burgeoning influence of the aforementioned collective orchestrated through processes of adjudication within the legal system as a means to further enhance the prospects of market-oriented consolidation through the enactment of Federally mandated regulations, the ratification of these measures specifically designed to eliminate competition within the agricultural industry. S. 510/ HR 2751 fails on moral, social, economic, political, constitutional, as well as the most fundamental human survival grounds. Listed below are the precepts governing the implementation of such a legislative measure:

Acxiom Corporation

As early as November of 2001, less than two months after events surrounding the 9/11 catastrophe achieved finality, Acxiom Corporation (A data and information systems agency based in Little Rock Arkansas); acting in concert with numerous intergovernmental liaisons present within the U.S. Department of Justice, sought the permission of judicial representatives to conduct an annually coordinated Internetwide surveillance of web addresses/ domain registries pertaining to the following subjects: abortion, racial superiority, politics, religion, immigration, and foreign affairs. Using technology specifically formulated to extract business contact information from site indices terminating with the .com appellate, material relevant to the aforementioned subject matter could then be utilized in a dual purpose role as both an instrument in terrorism-related data analysis and also as a fundamental prerequisite in the establishment of a transnationally coordinated identity verification system (This measure could then be incorporated into the electronic databases of every major Airline/ Travel Agency, rental car companies, corporate industrial conglomerates, as well as intergovernmental constituencies and their subsidiary affiliates to facilitate a greater degree of cohesion between each respective entity). It has been confirmed by a plethora of credible sources comprising the realm of alternative media that Acxiom Corporation sought an annual monetary allotment of $500,000 for services rendered in accordance with the procurement of such documentation.

Original Documentation and Research © 2006 Angela Gunn 

Paraphrased Documentation and Additional Research © 2012 Michael Reign

LINKED ARTICLE OF REFERENCE:

Acxiom Corporation Sought to Enlist the Aid of the Federal Government in the Implementation of a Transcontinental Web Surveillance Initiative Following the Events of September 11^th

The above illustrative composite details the genesis of Acxiom Corporation from its inception in 1969, under the Demographics Incorporated agnomen, as a small market communications/ data processing firm owing allegiance to the Democratic National Committee, to its current status as a Global Information Service/ Data Provider.

Flow chart demonstration detailing the degree/ scope of influence Acxiom’s Identity Verification System currently employed as a means to obtain the following information:

Credit Applications Histories
Credit Scores
Court Judgments/ Criminal Background Information
Postal Addresses
Geographical Identifiers
Political Affiliations
Vehicle Registration and Ownership Information
Product Registration Indices
Debt Histories/ Liabilities
Bankruptcy Filings/ Defaults
Account Holdings
Annual Earnings Statements
Web/ Internet Search Histories
Shopping Preferences/ Interests and Proclivities
Peer to Peer Interactions
Employment Histories
Places of Birth
Dates of Birth

The visual illustration depicted above the contents of this particular stanza examines the inter-relational aspects of various corporate firms and organizations with the Acxiom information and distribution center.

JSOC - Joint Special Operations Command

 

The State Defense Forces, a paramilitary accessory characterized as the civilian extension of the National Guard, that, in the event of civil unrest, would assume a proprietary role in security at the domestic level - a specialized services division that has since been integrated into the organizational structure of Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC). Established in 1980 based on the recommendation of Colonel Charles Beckwith in lieu of military complications arising from the issuance of several directives by the Carter Administration, specifically those pertinent to the Iran hostage crisis - a coordinated tactical offensive christened under the ‘Operation Eagle Claw’ title designation; JSOC is recognized as a component command unit of USSOCOM (United States Special Operations Command) charged with the study of special operations requirements and techniques designed to ensure interoperability and equipment standardization pursuant to the plan and execution of various mission-specific engagements. Several noted authors have voiced their concern regarding the existence of the aforementioned institution, most notably John Glaser, who offered the following assessment:

For the past decade, we’ve seen the rise of a secret, unaccountable U.S. military force… Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) is an unwieldy private army at the command of the President, and him only. And they conduct military and spy missions all over the world, never receiving formal congressional approval...

Nick Turse, a journalistic contributor for TomDispatch.com, echoed these sentiments with his iteration of the following statement:

“Without the knowledge of the American public, a secret force within the U.S. military is undertaking operations in a majority of the world’s countries. This new Pentagon power elite is waging a global war whose size and scope has never been revealed.”

Operation/ Project Monarch

Definition and Description

The name MONARCH is not necessarily defined within the context of royal nobility, but rather refers to the monarch butterfly. When a person is undergoing trauma induced by electroshock, a feeling of light-headedness is evidenced; as if one is floating or fluttering like a butterfly. There is also a symbolic representation pertaining to the transformation or metamorphosis of this beautiful insect: from a caterpillar to a cocoon (dormancy, inactivity), to a butterfly (new creation) which will return to its point of origin. Such is the migratory pattern that makes this species unique.  

Occult symbolism may give additional insight into the actual meaning of the prior stated directive. Psyche is the word for both “soul” and “butterfly” coming from the belief that human souls become butterflies while searching for a new reincarnation. Some ancient mystical groups, such as the Gnostics, saw the butterfly as a symbol of corrupt flesh. The “Angel of Death” in Gnostic art was portrayed crushing the butterfly. A marionette is a puppet that is attached to strings and is controlled by the puppet master, hence MONARCH programming is also referred to as the “Marionette Syndrome.” “Imperial Conditioning” is another term used, while some mental health therapists know it as “Conditioned Stimulus Response Sequences.” Project MONARCH could be best described as a form of structured dissociation and occultic integration, in order to compartmentalize the mind into multiple personalities within a systematic framework. During this process, a Satanic ritual, oftentimes inclusive of Cabalistic mysticism, is performed with the purpose of attaching a particular demon or group of demons to the corresponding alter(s). Of course, most skeptics would view this as simply a means to enhance trauma within the victim, negating any irrational belief that demonic possession actually occurs.

Conflict Records Research Center

 

 

Pursuant to the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2014, also known as H.R. 1960 (House Resolution 1960), the creation of a numerically indexed communications tracking registry known as the Conflict Records Research Center (CRRC), acting under the authority of the Secretary of Defense as well as the President, would serve as a cooperative medium of informational exchange between the current director of national intelligence and each of the aforementioned parties. The context of this particular provision as it appears in the U.S. Federal Registry, specifically Section 1071(a), which authorizes the establishment of the CRRC, is contained in the following visual appendages:

 

 

SOURCE ARTICLE/ REGISTRY LINK:

Congressional Representatives Formally Approve the 2014 Version of the National Defense Authorization Act by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

WRITTEN ADDENDUM: At the time of the aforementioned articles publication, President Barack Obama hadn’t yet formally enacted this particular directive into law; on December 27^th of 2013 however, the context of this legislative measure, in its entirety, was codified into the U.S. Federal Registry. The 2014 installment of the National Defense Authorization Act did nothing to repeal any of the provisions present within either of its previous incarnations, instead preserving the legislative continuity of prior stated directives - effectively re-emphasizing Sections 1021 and 1022 of the 2012-based initiative, stipulations present within the aforementioned documentation allowing for the indefinite detention of American citizens without the benefit of legal representation. 

National Defense Resources Preparedness Directive/ Executive Order 13603

 

Universally recognized as the legislative extension of the Defense Production Act of 1950, Executive Order 13603 - a Presidential Directive formally enacted into law on March 16^th of 2012 - effectively grants the standing president, as well as his/ her designated Cabinet and agency directors, the authority to forcibly commandeer and control the following:

All water
The production and distribution of all human or animal food products
All avenues of transportation
All energy sources
All materials related to the manufacture and construction of residential dwellings
All “health resources”
All farm equipment and agricultural materials
All fertilizers
All fuels
The actuality of such developments confirmed in the following passages of the aforementioned stipulation as it appears in the Federal Registry:

PROJECT ARGUS

 

Exists as a covert military intelligence operation incorporating a technological contrivance known as the ARGUS (Autonomous Real-Time Ground Ubiquitous Surveillance Imaging System) array - a data retention system comprised of numerous cameras and image resonance equipment capable of storing 1 million terabytes of information on a daily basis. The output of the imaging system is used to create extremely large 1.8GP (Giga Pixel) high-resolution mosaic visual composites and cinematic recordings from distances in excess of 15 square miles.

 

The U.S. Army, acting in conjunction with Boeing, has developed and is preparing to deploy the newest addition to its vast arsenal of unmanned aerial reconnaissance vehicles, the “Hummingbird”, to various regions ascribed primarily to the nation of Afghanistan for the duration of 2013.
 
The cinematic excerpt following this brief written annotation examines the technological capabilities of the ARGUS array image resonance system:

Disposition Matrix

 

A digitally indexed network database devised by political constituents within the Obama Administration in 2010, the Disposition Matrix effectively circumnavigates preexistent legislative parameters applicable to the notion of extrajudicial assassination. The conceptualization of such a device provided the necessary impetus for the creation of a system capable of mass producing statistical demographics similar in context to the practice of criminal profiling so often utilized by law enforcement agencies. Its actualization established the prevailing schema endemic to the tracking, prospective apprehension/ capture, rendering (Recognized as the terminological equivalent of extraordinary rendition/ irregular rendition, consists of the apprehension and the extrajudicial transfer of radical insurgents or terrorist agitators from one country to another. These practices became synonymous with the ‘War on Terror’, a colloquialization popularized by political constituents within the Bush Administration that referenced the transfer of suspected members of various criminal organizations to nations known to employ torture as a method of interrogation), or sanction (assassination) of suspected terrorists.
Further clarification regarding the existence of these Executive Kill Lists is provided by Ben Swann, an investigative reporter, who at the time of this particular interaction with President-elect Barack Obama, was actively employed by FOX19 (A Fox News affiliate based in Ohio), and journalist Greg Miller in the following statement to the media:

“The matrix contains the names of terrorism suspects arrayed against an accounting of the resources being marshaled to track them down, including sealed indictments and clandestine operations,” Miller explains. “US officials said the database is designed to go beyond existing kill lists, mapping plans for the ‘disposition’ of suspects beyond the reach of American drones.”

This particular policy is consistent with the utilization of automated weapons systems/ drone technologies, covert reconnaissance and espionage military contingents, radical political elements, rogue government operatives, etc.; as a means to effectively destabilize regions of conflict through the extrajudicial assassination of suspected insurgents on a transnational level. This directive’s scope of influence was eventually expanded to include individuals on a domestic front.

LAYMAN’S SYNOPSIS - by Michael Reign - Simply stated, the Disposition Matrix is a name utilized by the current political administration as a means to somehow mitigate the nefarious connotation associated with the subject of extrajudicial assassination. The prevailing tactic utilized by the government to effectively execute these types of sanctions (killings or assassinations) incorporates the use of militarized drone technologies.

FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (In its original founding FEMA was recognized as the Federal Emergency Military Assistance Branch, its initials revised as a means to obfuscate its actual purpose within the sociopolitical arena), oftentimes identified through the use of its acronymic equivalent, ‘FEMA;' is the unacknowledged extension of the Federal Government whose existence a sizable contingent of the general public have come to associate with the execution of various relief operations following the incidence of natural disaster. These blanket assertions couldn’t be anymore divorced from reality, as the following written exposition will attest to—expanding on the definition and impact of numerous key stipulations and legislative provisions pursuant to the actualization of this assembly, that, when taken into context, effectively contradict this acknowledged consensus of beneficence.

Shadow Government

 
Similar in context to the publicly acknowledged system of regency - that which was constructed through the electoral process and appointed service - the Shadow Government possesses a certain degree of functionality as dictated by the presence of individual branches, these being distinguished by a level of autonomy relative to each of their respective purposes. However, unlike its sociopolitical counterpart, the principal objective relevant to the non-executive branches of this clandestine ensemble lies in the allocation of various functions, simultaneously maintaining its independence from the standardized system of checks and balances as predicated upon the precepts detailed within the Constitution (Documentation that serves as canon with reference to the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the United States Government). The purported existence of a Shadow Government within the inner recesses of Federal legislative mandate attains a measure of credibility due to the presence of elitist factions within the contemporary administrative exemplar. In the confines of the Shadow Government five distinct branches merit examination. These divisions present within this Federally subsidized assemblage are listed as follows: the Executive Branch, the Intelligence Branch, the War Department, the Weapons Industry Branch, and the Financial Department.
The reporting lines of the Intelligence Branch and the War Department to the Executive Branch are apparent in design and unambiguous in nature. Intelligence exists to provide the Executive Branch with a sufficient repository of information in order to facilitate the enactment of adequately informed policy decisions. The War Department exists to provide the coercive force necessary to facilitate the implementation of Executive mandate which would otherwise generate public resistance. Special Operations units comprising the inner recesses of the Intelligence Branch and War Department, respectively, function as the impetus behind the execution of policy directives requiring subterfuge, oftentimes employing the use of official deniability with regard to existence of these sanctions. The Weapons Industry Branch reports to the Executive Branch, often indirectly, through intermediary agencies comprising the War Department and/or Intelligence Branch for the express purpose of funding the procurement of Black Budget weapons systems.
The Financial Department theoretically reports to the Executive Branch for fiscal policy implementation, but in a de facto sense also communicates directly with the international power brokers responsible for the creation of the Shadow Government as well as its correspondent agencies of influence. The Financial Department serves as a catalyst agency whose primary objectives routinely coincide with the manufacture and implementation of a fraudulent corporatist monopoly system within the prevailing industries of finance. An in depth analysis of the overall purposes of these five branches suggests that the principal objective relevant to the establishment of a Shadow Government within the national political framework, is the actualization of an authoritarian construct, whereby the general populace is subject to an innumerable host of restrictive Federal mandates/ sanctions designed to curtail personal freedoms through each of the following acts:

1) Collecting comprehensive institutional and personal information through the implementation of a nationalized covert surveillance system

2) By enacting national and international policy independent of the established political administration

3) By developing high-tech armament and munitions, and, in correlation with these, the establishment of small, specialized, highly mobile, elite military units to effect the implementation of covert sanctions; when need arises, devoid of any semblance of reliance on the official branches of Armed Service (whose allegiance to the Shadow Government is reasonably suspect)

4) By developing an armed capability to repel any threat to the status quo, (including the uncertain ontological, social, and economic impacts of any revelation of the reality of a UFO/ extraterrestrial presence) through the development of a Star Wars/ BMDO (Ballistic Missile Defense Organization) ground and space-based surveillance and SDI (Strategic Defense Initiatives) weapons network

5) By questioning the authenticity of information generated from extraneous political appendages of influence, either directly or indirectly responsible for the levying of administrative policy, which would otherwise serve to compromise the existence of the Shadow Government

6) By exercising a fiscal monopoly over monetary assets, manipulating the factors governing the availability of credit along with the intrinsic value of the national currency, accomplished through the enactment of policies beyond the legislative periphery of the acknowledged administration

Original Documentation © Richard J. Boylan Ph. D.

Paraphrased Documentation/ Text and Additional Research © 2010-2013 Michael Reign - All Rights Reserved.

The following cinematic presentation offers insight into the origins of this symposium, examining the concept of government continuity:

 

WRITTEN ADDENDUM: Those doubting the existence of this clandestine ensemble have only to refer to the following utterance, a formal proclamation issued by Senator Daniel Inouye in 1987, acting as the Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Secret Military Assistance to Iran, during the course of several public hearings devoted to uncovering the truth regarding the Iran-Contra Affair:

 

Svalbard Global Seed Vault

 

 

The Svalbard Global Seed Vault (Norwegian translation: Svalbard globale frøhvelv), a massive storage receptacle based exclusively on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen in close proximity to the town of Longyearbyen in the remote Arctic Svalbard archipelago (a prominent topographic feature located 1,300 kilometers or 800 miles from the principal vicinity of the North Pole), houses more than 2.25 billion seeds. Authored into existence by the Globalist Patriarchy, specifically the Gates and Rockefeller Foundations, this prodigious construct exists as an artifice of preservation in the event of natural disaster or thermonuclear conflagration. The following illustrative composites offer prospective viewing audiences greater insight into the exact nature of this repository, showcasing its architectural dimensions as well as several aspects pertaining to its interior periphery.

Sunshine Project

 

The Sunshine Project is an international non-governmental organization (A corporate entity also known under the NGO standard abbreviation, non-governmental organizations exist as legal institutions or independently owned firms whose scope of operation is purportedly independent of government affiliation. The principal origin of the term, ‘NGO,’ was in the form of written transcription by legal constituencies present within the United Nations. The use of such descriptors referencing the existence of organizations exhibiting an autonomous relationship with acknowledged entities occupying federal distinction. These agencies can still retain their non-governmental status despite receiving monetary funding from intergovernmental luminaries through their exclusion of representatives from within the aforementioned appendages) whose suggested purpose of beneficence concerns the prohibition of abuses by the military with regard to the application of biotechnological agents during the course of battlefield simulation exercises or combat preparedness initiatives. These preliminary operations conducted in advance of federally sanctioned conflicts. Its scope of influence stretching beyond the borders of the continental United States and into the vast expanses of the European periphery. Founded in 1999 by German biologist Jan van Aken, the genesis of the organization culminated through the collaborative efforts of Edward Hammond, an American legal policy researcher, and Susan Pimiento, a Colombian born practicing lawyer residing in the United States. The nomenclature used in the classification of the aforementioned initiative, a terminological designation proffered by Charles Margulis, is recognized as a suggestive metaphor referencing the tendency of biological agents to experience rapid deteriorations in efficacy due, in large part, to their exposure to sunlight. With offices in Austin, Texas; (Initially its base of operations within the continental United States was Seattle, Washington) and Hamburg, Germany; the progenitors of this program sought to implement directives banning the use of biological derivatives during the eradication of illicit crop yields in various parts of the world (The use of the term, ‘illicit,’ recognized as a functional analogy referencing the cultivation of narcotic-based derivatives possessing natural distinction - primarily in the form of opium-laced hallucinogenic agents from the sale and distribution of poppy plants and neurological stimulants obtained through illegal transactions involving the purchase of cannabis-related materials and coca). The Sunshine Project, at the apex of its development, specialized in the following arenas:

SubTropolis



A 55,000,000 square foot (5,060,000 m³), 1,100-acre (4.5 km²) subterranean enclosure situated within the bluffs directly above the Missouri River in the general vicinity of Kansas City. This government funded project is recognized as the world’s largest underground storage facility. Developed by late Kansas City Chiefs National Football League Franchise owner Lamar Hunt via Hunt Midwest Real Estate Development, Inc., it came to trademark the phrase “World’s Largest Underground Business Complex”.
The SubTropolis structure serves as yet another example of the corporatist monopolized telecommunications industry’s myriad attempts to portray the construction of government subsidized underground facilities in a beneficent light. Each one individually, formally recognized as a subsidiary interagency component within the framework of a multitudinous collective aggregate actively engaging in the concealment of documented evidence proffered by numerous accredited researchers - documentation contradictory to any purported claims of viability.

The cinematic references below confirm the existence of this labyrinthine construct, a gargantuan subterranean super complex extending thousands of miles beneath the Ozark mountains: