Written By Michael Reign on Thursday, May 30, 2019 | 10:28 PM
Commonly referred to as ‘the New World Order’, but also identified as global governance, world state, world empire or cosmocracy; the conceptualization of a one world government possessing planetary jurisdiction on an executive, legislative, judiciary, theological, military, and/ or constitutional level is oftentimes relegated to the subject of ‘conspiratorial conjecture’ by various elements of the corporate telecommunications oligopoly (a euphemistic characterization applicable to mainstream media and their journalistic affiliates) that seek to delegitimize the prospect of open debate that would otherwise contradict assertions of a bipartisan impetus to facilitate its enactment. The role of supranational assemblies such as the United Nations, which was founded on June 26th, 1945 at the San Francisco Conference (prior to its formulation, the UN existed as a conceptualized proposal, the fundamental tenets of which were developed at the Dumberton Oaks Conference in 1944. The aforementioned colloquium shrouded in secrecy, with political representatives from the United States, England, and Russia counted among its attendees. Alger Hiss,
a Trustee of the Woodrow Wilson Foundation, Director of the Executive Committee of the American Association for the United Nations, a director of the American Peace Society, Trustee of the World Peace Foundation, a director of the American Institute of Pacific Relations, and President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Organization; coordinated the event. In 1950, Hiss was convicted of perjury stemming from his repeated denials of involvement with the Soviet Union as a communist collaborator and subsequently remanded to a Federal penitentiary pursuant to violations of the ‘Espionage Act of 1917’. The UN’s actualization, where set objectives governing its eventual establishment attained precedence, occurred at the Yalta Conference in February of 1945, with acting U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Joseph Stalin’s attendance having been recorded) as a replacement for the League of Nations following the conclusion of the Second World War to effect the creation of a system of internationalist law and regulation designed to foster socioeconomic development (in actuality, the manipulation of prevailing financial market indices through the coordinated fluctuation of interest rates to effect the collapse of rogue nations and institutions that act in opposition to the machinations of the Rothschild Dynastic Order, an ancestral collective that controls every conceivable aspect of finance via the Bank for International Settlements, identified by the acronym BIS,
and its subsidiary complements within the framework of the Central Banking System), ensure the preservation of human rights, hasten societal evolution and advancement (encapsulating technological innovation in the maturation of telecommunications capability through the emergence of a globally centralized panopticon of surveillance,
Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era
the pharmaceutical industry and the subsequent mandate of mass inoculation as a means of population control that would initially target the inhabitants of nations meriting ‘Third World’ classification,
William “Bill” Henry Gates III, the principal founder of the Microsoft Corporation, American business magnate, investor, author, philanthropist, and humanitarian; emphasizing the necessity of population reduction through coordinated mass vaccination initiatives as a means of staving off global temperature increases through unconstrained carbon emissions during the course of a syndicated TED (Technology, Entertainment and Design) Conference in 2010
Orchestrated sterility through the application of inoculative arrays is but one of many calculated strategies being employed by Elitist malefactors to effectively reduce the perceived environmental burden associated with a burgeoning populational matrix. In more economically developed nations, specifically the United States, the administration of pharmacological complements as a means of mitigating the spread of disease has yielded a stark increase in the incidence of Autism Spectrum Disorders as evidenced in the graphic below:
This sequence of events a collaborative venture designed by its progenitors to bankrupt prospective families with abortion being made readily available as an inexpensive alternative to a lifetime of financial obligation.
The orchestrated and deliberate contamination of pharmaceutical agents and their immunological ancillaries with HEK (Human Embryonic Kidney) cell lines procured from the cultures of aborted, clinically deceased, and stillborn infants also extends into the nation’s food supply, as detailed in the following article:
the education system as an instrument of indoctrination into Neo-Marxian philosophy,
theological discourse as a mechanism of New Age revival, et al), and promote pseudo terrestrial armistice under the banner of unitarian conformity, can’t be understated, as evidenced in the paragraphs and illustrations that appear below:
United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA)
A promulgated addition to the United Nations System whose origins can be traced back to founding of the League of Nations (LN or LoN) on January 10th, 1920, and the denouement of World War II that was later reintroduced during the Campaign for a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (CUNPA), a transnationally coordinated endeavor authored into existence in 2007 by Democracy Without Borders (Formerly known as the Committee for a Democratic U.N.), designed by its progenitors to “raise greater awareness and participation by strengthening the voices of legislators in global institutions.” The aforementioned platitude attributed to former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and the erstwhile Nigerian Foreign Minister Ibrahim Gambari. Recall Albright’s commentary regarding the acceptability of civilian casualties resulting from economic sanctions in Iraq, a sequence of events that would later precipitate the Persian Gulf War:
United World Federalists
The phrase, “World Peace Through World Law” (later attributed to future U.S. President Richard Milhous Nixon), serving as the allegorical archetype for the Latin idiom, “Ordo Ab Chao”, that when translated to its English equivalent yields “Order Out of Chaos”, two terms indispensable to the premise of the Hegelian Dialectic.
The Hegelian Dialectic is, in short, the process by which the ruling elite deliberately orchestrate a crisis, anticipating in advance the elicited reaction created in connection with the given quandary, thus conditioning the populace to accept change as necessity. When the population is properly conditioned, the desired agenda of the status quo is presented as the only viable solution. The proposed resolution is never intended to solve this artfully orchestrated paroxysm, but rather to serve as the basis for the genesis of a new climacteric or to exacerbate the existing one. When the previous dilemma approaches its climax and rests on the ever precarious verge of developing into a national exigency, it in turn becomes the foundation upon which arguments may again be made for change. Hence, the initial process is placed in a state of suspended animation within an endless cycle of repetition, moving society further toward the precipice of uncertainty with regard to the ends devised by the planners of these events. It’s also imperative to the casual observer that he or she understands/ comprehends that the impetus which propels such contrivances is being dictated by the politically oriented discourse of clandestine assemblies, preconceived stipulations referencing the imposition of change to various segments of the population. Each debate recognized as being a facilitator for the actualization of the subsequent plot. The presented solutions — each with varying levels of unadornment — are openly questioned in a public forum by Elitist conspirators or their minion sycophants. Such measures are enacted until a perceived compromise has been agreed upon in accordance with the desire to effect solutions to the engineered impasse. It is then that the outcome of the polemic — which purportedly weighs the concerns of the plebeian masses with the adoption of legislative edict — is enacted as public policy.
Another lesser known, but all the more relevant incarnation, of the maxim, “World Peace Through World Law”, would be integrated into one of Hasbro, Incorporated’s most noteworthy children and adolescent toy/ entertainment product lines in 1984 (Coincidentally, as skeptics are often wont to associate the convergence of events with concomitant happenstance, the year ‘1984’ happens to be the title of one George Orwell’s most celebrated literary achievements, it also marked the passage of one of the U.S. Federal Government’s most notorious pieces of legislation with the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, a policy directive that effectively mandated the establishment of the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund) with the introduction of Megatron, the despotic commander of the Decepticon alliance in the Transformers episodic series, who espoused the motto, “Peace Through Tyranny”, as a means of maintaining law and order within his respective sphere of influence.
The World Federalist Movement: Assessing Its Historical Significance Through the Evolutionary Lens of Modernity
Established by Norman Cousins and James P. Warburg (active participants in the Council on Foreign Relations, commonly referred to as the CFR) on February 22, 1947, through the consolidated merger of the Americans United for World Government, World Federalists, Massachusetts Committee for World Federation, Student Federalists, World Citizens of Georgia, and World Republic. Their stated objective was the endorsement of “the efforts of the United Nations to bring about a world community favorable to peace… (and) to strengthen the United Nations into a world government of limited powers adequate to prevent a war and having direct intervention over the individual.” Future U.S. President Richard Milhous Nixon was quoted with the following utterance in reference to the United World Federalist assembly:
“Your organization can perform an important service by continuing to emphasize that world peace can only come through world law. Our goal is world peace.”
Communist Legacy and Associations Applicable to the UN’s Founding
The inherent purpose governing the UN’s (United Nations) establishment lies in the revitalization and eventual activation of a geopolitically motivated communist/ authoritarian transhemispheric gestalt, the evidence of these claims corroborated in the following statements, all of which were made by individuals loyal to these types of ideologies:
“The Kremlin masterminds . . . never intended the UN as a peace-keeping organization . . . It is a Trojan horse whose aim is to serve the Communist penetration of the West.”
“I need not be a member of the United Nations Secretariat to know that the UN blueprint is a Communist one. I was at Moscow headquarters for nearly three years and was acquainted with most of the top leaders. I went to their colleges, I learned their patterns of operations, and if I see that pattern in effect anywhere, I recognize it.”
“Its internal setup, Communist designed, is a pattern for sociological conquest, a pattern aimed to serve the purpose of Communist penetration of the West. It is ingenious and deceptive.”
Joseph Zach Kornfeder (1898-1963), founding member and director of the Communist Party of America in 1919, Communist Party USA (CPUSA) leader, and Comintern (Communist International) representative to South America
“When the Yalta Conference had ended, the Communists prepared to support the United Nations Charter which was to be adopted at the San Francisco conference to be held in May and June, 1945. For this I organized a corps of speakers and we took to the street corners and held open-air meetings in the millinery and clothing sections of New York where thousands of people congregate at the lunch hour. We spoke of the need for world unity and in support of the Yalta decisions.”
Bella Dodd (1904-1969), her real name being Maria Asunta Isabella Visono, teacher, lawyer, labor union activist and contributing member of Communist Party USA (CPUSA), author of the book ‘School of Darkness’, a 1954 written publication documenting the infiltration of the Catholic Church by communist adherents and exposing the orchestrated subversion of various institutions and agencies within the U.S. Federal Government by globalist proponents
NOTE - Contrary to what many within the mainstream media would espouse as gospel truth, the existence of this esoteric assembly isn’t based on fabrication and innuendo, as evidenced in the following visuals and cinematic references documenting the mention of this supposedly ‘non-existent’ organization by both renowned and reviled public and political figures throughout the course of recorded history.
New World Order - Proclamations of Intent
Katharine Meyer Graham’s (1917-2001) vision of multimedia networks and institutions actively collaborating with government functionaries to conceal ‘sensitive’ information from the general public through disinformation campaigns and propagandized exploits came to fruition in 2013 with the repeal of restrictive mandate governing the publication of material designed to alter public opinion and influence perception in the interest of corporate telecommunications agencies in the United States. The National Defense Authorization Act of 2013 - specifically Amendment 114, which was approved by the House of Representatives in May of 2012 - effectively negated the protectionist clauses present within both the U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (Public Law 80-402), as well as the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1987, that would have otherwise shielded impressionable viewers from the pervasive specter of government-sponsored disinformation.
Proposed Constitution for the Newstates of America
The Constitution for the Newstates of America is a written proposal authored into existence by the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions (Oftentimes referred to as the CSDI, recognized as a non-governmental organization possessing ties to the Ford Foundation through its subsidiary, the Fund for the Republic, which had been established by way of a $15 million federal grant by the acting chairman of the Foundation’s corporate special interests sector) that effects the formulation of a domestic 10-region directorate
within the continental United States. The legislative provision, encompassing Hawaii, as well as the outlying territorial municipalities (Guam, Puerto Rico, et al) of the U.S., redefines the concept of national sovereignty, specifically at state level, as alluded to in Article II of said document. This section of the stipulative measure revisiting the interpretation of statehood as dictated by Constitutional mandate and supplanting prior forms of its characterization as independent entities operating within the framework of a Federalist system of governance with a regionally administered ‘Newstate’ conglomerate in advance of a globally centralized ‘New Order of Nations.’
A World 2010, A New Order of Nations (Charles W. Taylor, 1992)
ALTERNATIVE WORLD SCENARIOS FOR A NEW ORDER OF NATIONS (Charles W. Taylor, 1993)
Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice
National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) | The Kissinger Report (Depopulation Directives Through Engineered Scarcity of Resources)
NSSM 200, adopted as official policy in November of 1975 by Gerald Ford and numerous political constituents within his administration, outlined a clandestine proposal to reduce population growth within the continental United States and in numerous correspondent nations deemed to be threats to the preservation of national security through Federally and legislatively mandated birth control, incidences of conflict via nuclear proliferation and orchestrated acts of aggression, and famine generated through price controls and inflationary disparities as a means of inducing mass starvation and genocide. NSSM 200 concluded that the United States was threatened by population growth in 13 “key countries” where it held a “special political and strategic interest”: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia. It asserted that population growth in those nations was especially disconcerting - for if left unchecked - would result in a dramatic increase in their relative political, economic, and military potentiality.
New World Order: Chronology and Future Endeavors (1969 Insider Testimonial)
The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
This document emphasizing the use of Third World inhabitants as an expeditionary invasion force designed to destabilize certain geographical regions through a coordinated campaign of replacement migration whereby the customs and traditions of indigenous segments of the population are systematically purged prior to the institution of authoritarian mandate. In theory, this coordinated delineation of territorial boundary was designed to gauge the reaction of the general public in advance of what would later become a concerted effort by internationalist organizations and extrajudicial assemblies to author into existence a North American amalgam. A regional conglomerate that would ultimately mirror the European Union, with the abolition of geographical precinct through the incidence of engineered military conflicts precipitating a clash of civilizations.
The Earth Charter - Preservation of Environment as the Impetus Toward World Peace
The World Order in 2050 (Carnegie Institute)
UN Regionalization, FEMA, and the Abolition of State Sovereignty
United Nations Agenda 2030 - Adoption of the Post 2015 Development Agenda
United Nations Agenda 2030 - Sustainable Development
World Governance | Constitution for the Federation of the Earth
World Governance | Constitution for the Federation of the Earth and the Evolution of Law
Written By Michael Reign on Thursday, October 8, 2015 | 10:51 PM
[Posted entry serves as a supplemental derivative of the 16th fundamental tenet of the Illuminati/ New World Order Manifesto, a point of reference emphasizing prolonged periods of unemployment and the escalation of diminishing opportunities - two interrelated socioeconomic states of condition exacerbated by the unchecked influx of foreign nationals besieging portions of the American Southwest]
Illegal immigration, a subject long considered by its proponents within the corporatist patriarchy of America to be of particular interest, especially as it pertains to the concept of wage dissemination, worker’s compensation benefits, assumed responsibility concerning the welfare of prospective employees, scope of onus in the event of injury or death in the work environment, etc. These items, when taken into consideration as a more significant component of a particular business or corporation’s aggregate revenue, can adversely affect the economic stability of industry. It is for these reasons that multinational conglomerates, as well as their constituencies occupying positions of authority within the political establishment, actively seek to acquire the services of undocumented immigrants from Central and South America. Those present within the upper echelons of these firms systematically exploit these individuals through the administration of unscrupulous labor practices, due, in large part, to their unregistered status. Corporate industry, commercial finance, and their acquaintance with the political aristocracy are well documented, as a vast majority of the campaign contributions delegated to prospective electoral candidates originate from these same institutions, a fact evidenced in the following visual as well as its accompanying article of reference:
These monetary disbursements establishing the framework for future endeavors between each of these entities, a sordid laundry of illicit transactions influencing the decision making process of the electorate and compromising the integrity of political institutions and agencies.
The Cloward-Piven Strategy and the Origin and Inherent Purpose of Multicultural Assimilation
In 1966, Richard Andrew Cloward, a political activist and professor of sociology who taught at Columbia University for 47 years, and Frances Fox Piven, a professor of political science and sociology at the Graduate Center, City University of New York since 1982; devised a strategy to hasten the collapse of a nation’s economic infrastructure through the imposition of unwarranted financial obligations to governmental systems in the guise of ensuring equality among each of its societal classes. Deliberate in its scope of execution, the progenitors of this particular philosophy sought to effect the transformation of America from a system of free-enterprise capitalism to a feudal collectivist dynamic. Inspired by events precipitating the Watts Rebellion of 1965, a series of violent demonstrations that occurred in the black district of Watts in Los Angeles from August 11th to August 17th of the aforementioned year - believed to be the result of police brutality, an incident involving the use of unnecessary force against an individual deemed too inebriated to adequately comply with instruction - Cloward and Piven authored the publication of an article titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” in the May 2, 1966 issue of 'The Nation.' The written context ascribed to this particular article of reference accused the ruling classes of using the welfare system as an instrument of exploitation, depriving impoverished segments of society of their role, and therefore their scope of influence, in the political decision making process, thereby extinguishing the flames of any potential uprising through the monthly allocation of government (taxpayer funded) stipends. Numerous statements attributed to Richard Andrew Cloward emphasized the poor's advancement at the expense of other societal elements, predominantly through an orchestrated campaign of intimidation, as the following utterance, a formal proclamation given to The New York Times in 1970, alludes to:
“Poor people can advance only when the rest of society is afraid of them.”
Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.
The primary impetus behind each of these instigated revolts would possess a central theme emphasizing the inherent inadequacies of welfare policy and legislation. Early proponents of the Cloward-Piven Strategy cited the works of Saul Alinsky, a radical community organizer and noted author, as their greatest inspiration. Incorporating Alinsky’s “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules” phrase (an utterance attributed to the '1971 Rules for Radicals' publication, a book the aforementioned novelist dedicated to Lucifer)
as a type of motivational parlance, adherents to the fundamental tenets of the Cloward-Piven doctrine oftentimes made use of the following analogy:
When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short.
The system’s failure to satisfy these perceived obligations could then be used as an instrument of degradation, thus engineering its eventual demise. Cloward and Piven noted that the number of Americans receiving federally subsidized monetary allotments under the guidelines of the current system - approximately 8 million at the time of the movement’s proposal (A number that has since increased more than 1250% to its present estimate of 108,592,800, a numerical approximation that, when paired in correspondence with the current number of food stamp recipients in the United States - 47.2 million as of June 2014* - exceeds the cumulative population of Spain) -
* A statistical measure that has since decreased to 45.7 million - the most recent estimate being acknowledged as of February 2015. Questions of accuracy linger with regard to the Federal Government’s own system of records and analysis, the most glaring of which being the blatant manipulation of the national rate of unemployment as there are now in excess of 102.6 million Americans either temporarily displaced from their previous occupations or who remain unaccounted for through a non-participatory role in the existing labor force. Inputting the aforementioned numeric figure into a arithmetical system of operation - in this particular instance emphasis being concentrated on the concept of division with the cumulative measure referencing the total number of individuals that are currently unemployed as dictated by the Federal Government’s labor force participation rate prospectus being designated as the numerator (also classified as the dividend), and the most recent metrics governing the U.S. population as a statistical aggregate being designated as the denominator (also identified as the divisor) one would be left with the following:
102.6 million or 102,600,000 (Numeric estimation governing most relevant release of information pertaining to the subject of joblessness in the United States) / 325,828,500 (A figure representative of the U.S. population as a proffered numerical estimate based on empirical data accumulation - this measure increasing by one every 16 seconds)
Performing the prescribed operative sequence involving these figures would involve the resolution of the specified notation ‘102,600,000/325,828,500’ - a calculated series of progressions that ultimately yields the decimal approximation 0.31488958148228285739276950911292 as a quotient.
0.31488958148228285739276950911292 when rounded upward, as the digit following the ‘4’ in the prior stated metric necessitates, would result in 0.315 as a base approximate, that, when transcribed into its percentile equivalent would yield 31.5%.
31.5% then would be a more accurate representation of the current rate of unemployment in the United States, not the preposterous 5.1% calculation that is routinely being circulated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) - as well as a vast majority of mainstream media and telecommunications outlets and newspaper publications - as indisputable evidence of economic recovery.
Men especially, have only to glance at the algorithmic data estimates in this graphical representation to acquire some semblance of clarity as to the nature of their predicament in the prevailing job market:
was a figure representative of less than half the number eligible to receive such benefits. On numerous occasions they proposed a “massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare rolls.” Cloward and Piven concluded that persuading even a small fraction of potential welfare recipients to demand access to these entitlements would effect the bankruptcy of the current system. The result, they predicted, would be “a profound financial and political crisis” that would unleash “powerful forces for major economic reform at the national level.”
The written context of their 1966 article, “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty,” sought the introduction of various “cadres of aggressive organizers” to use “demonstrations to create a climate of militancy” as a means of fomenting dissent amongst each of the societal classes. Using threats of violence to intimidate the national electorate, state representatives would then petition their political constituencies in the Federal Government for assistance. Methodically orchestrated media campaigns through the infiltration of the telecommunications industry by journalistic protagonists, effectively promoting the enactment of policy in reference to the concept of “a federally sanctioned initiative emphasizing the necessity of income redistribution,” a calculated strategy that would, in theory, engender the creation of guaranteed monetary stipends for all - both the employed as well as the unemployed. Local state and government officials would actively encourage the passage of similar legislation within their communal districts, applying considerable pressure on Washington with regard to its implementation.
In its modern incarnation, the Cloward-Piven Strategy is recognized as a coordinated attempt by state sponsored provocateurs to goad the disenfranchised into believing that their efforts to ensure income equality at the expense of their personal freedoms is in their best interest. The aforementioned course of action designed to function as a Trojan Horse exercise - mass movements whose outward purpose and appearance masquerades in the guise of beneficence, providing financial assistance to the most destitute segments of society, yet whose principal objective lies in the recruitment of these individuals as revolutionary foot soldiers to effect the collapse of the prevailing socioeconomic dynamic.
The prospect of multicultural assimilation, in its initial semblance, entailed the coerced merger of tradition, philosophy, and religious predilection of minority assemblies into those of the aggregate majority by the political establishment. In its present form, this concept pertains to the introduction of foreign nationals into the regional periphery of a particular territory or district through a process of administrative interventionism, predominantly under the guise of executive decree. In America, this notion of intercultural diversification concerns the engineered dissolution of geographical borders and territorial boundaries, a sequence of events culminating in the terminus of national sovereignty and the actualization of a North American Technate - a regional amalgam commonly referred to as the North American Union.
Numerous organizations evincing ties to this multiculturalist procession, specifically La Raza (Spanish linguistic equivalency recognized as ‘The Race’) and MECHa (Spanish linguistic equivalency recognized as Movimiento Estudiantil Chican@ de Aztlán, “Chican@ Student Movement of Aztlán,” the group’s use of the ‘@’ symbolic representation indicative of gender neutral inflection), seek the establishment of a separate and autonomous extrajudicial empire in the American Southwest, presumably in accordance with the belief of Aztlán’s existence as the ancestral domicile of the Aztec civilization.
Acting under the assumed identities ‘Hispanic Homeland’ and ‘Nation of Aztlán,’ activists from the aforementioned organizations, as well as the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), are attempting to facilitate the annexation of large portions of the Southwestern United States into Mexico. Historically, these organizations have taught that the states of Colorado, California, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, Texas, and Oregon - as well as portions of Oklahoma and Washington - comprise the prior stated amalgam. These are all areas America should surrender to “La Raza” once enough immigrants, legal or illegal, enter to claim a majority, as in Los Angeles. The current borders of the United States would simply be extinguished. One of these assemblies, MECHa, incorporates the use of the following principles as part of its founding doctrine, a document known as “El Plan Espiritual de Aztlán” (Literal translation recognized as “The Spiritual Plan for Aztlán”):
“Chicano is our identity; it defines who we are as people. It rejects the notion that we should assimilate into the Anglo-American melting pot ...Aztlán was the legendary homeland of the Aztecas ...It became synonymous with the vast territories of the Southwest, brutally stolen from a Mexican people marginalized and betrayed by the hostile custodians of the Manifest Destiny.” - (Statement on University of Oregon MECHa Website, Jan. 3, 2006).
“In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud historical heritage but also of the brutal gringo invasion of our territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land of Aztlán from whence came our forefathers, reclaiming the land of their birth and consecrating the determination of our people of the sun, declare that the call of our blood is our power, our responsibility, and our inevitable destiny. ...Aztlán belongs to those who plant the seeds, water the fields, and gather the crops and not to the foreign Europeans. ...We are a bronze people with a bronze culture. Before the world, before all of North America, before all our brothers in the bronze continent, we are a nation, we are a union of free pueblos, we are Aztlán. For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada.”
The closing two-sentence stanza illustrates the intent of these organizations, for in its literal translation lies its inherent connotation: “For The Race everything. Outside The Race, nothing.”
The actualization of these particular objectives, what is commonly referred to as the “Reconquista” (Literal translation recognized as Reconquest), won’t conclude with territorial occupation and the forfeiture of state sovereignty, as its ultimate design concerns the ethnic cleansing of Americans of European, African, and Asian descent from the geographical boundaries of Aztlán - a fact evidenced in the following statement from Miguel Perez of Cal-State Northridge’s MECHa chapter:
“The ultimate ideology is the liberation of Aztlán. Communism would be closest [to it]. Once Aztlán is established, ethnic cleansing would commence: Non-Chicanos would have to be expelled -- opposition groups would be quashed because you have to keep power.”
Charles Truxillo, a onetime professor at the University of New Mexico and a prominent advocate of the Reconquista Movement (Link 1, Link 2- The Reconquista, or “Reconquest,” Movement, which is also referred to as Greater Mexico, exists as the figurative characterization of the increased demographic and cultural presence of Mexicans in the American Southwest. The term’s utilization in contemporary settings was popularized by noted authors Carlos Fuentes and Elena Poniatowska, who initially intended to adopt the use of the phrase as a type of jocular analogy referencing the Spanish Reconquista of Moorish Iberia, as the areas of greatest Mexican immigration and cultural integration are conterminous with the territories the United States gained from Mexico in the 19th Century following the ratification of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. However, certain groups that identify themselves with the modern Hispanic Mexico, such as the Mexican Nationalist Front, see the losses of northern territories following the Mexican-American War as an illegitimate compromise and seek a restoration of prior established boundaries), is actively seeking the formulation of a regional construct known as “Republica del Norte” (Republic of the North), which would include the present states of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, as well as the southern periphery of Colorado.
Evidence of Intergovernmental Collusion in the Surge of Illegal Immigrants Entering the Continental United States
On January 29, 2014, the Federal Government (specifically political constituents within the Obama Administration), through the FedBizOpps.gov (Federal Business Opportunities) web extension, solicited the services of various escort agencies in the transportation and housing of unaccompanied children entering the United States illegally. The following illustrative composites alluding to these findings:
Details regarding the stipulated requirements necessary to apply for such positions are documented in the following statements:
Procurement Type: Request for Information (RFI)/ Sources Sought
Title: Escort Services for Unaccompanied Alien Children
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a component of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has a continuing and mission critical responsibility for accepting custody of Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) from U.S. Border Patrol and other Federal agencies and transporting these juveniles to Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) shelters located throughout the continental United States. ICE is seeking the services of a responsible vendor that shares the philosophy of treating all UAC with dignity and respect, while adhering to standard operating procedures and policies that allow for an effective, efficient, and incident free transport. The Contractor shall provide unarmed escort staff, including management, supervision, manpower, training, certifications, licenses, drug testing, equipment, and supplies necessary to provide on-demand escort services for non-criminal/non-delinquent unaccompanied alien children ages infant to 17 years of age, seven (7) days a week, 365 days a year. Transport will be required for either category of UAC or individual juveniles, to include both male and female juveniles. There will be approximately 65,000 UAC in total: 25% local ground transport, 25% via ICE charter and 50% via commercial air. Escort services include, but are not limited to, assisting with: transferring physical custody of UAC from DHS to Health and Human Services (HHS) care via ground or air methods of transportation (charter or commercial carrier), property inventory, providing juveniles with meals, drafting reports, generating transport documents, maintaining/stocking daily supplies, providing and issuing clothing as needed, coordinating with DHS and HHS staff, travel coordination, limited stationary guard services to accommodate for trip disruptions due to inclement weather, faulty equipment, or other exigent circumstances. In emergency situations, the Contractor shall be called on to provide temporary shelter locations (such as trailers) with shower facilities for juveniles who are pending placement with HHS when bed space is unavailable nationwide for extended periods of time. The Contractor shall provide temporary guard services and other support as necessary during these emergencies.
In addition, the Contractor shall have personnel who are able to communicate with juveniles in their own designated language(s). While this may not require each employee to be fluent in all of the encountered languages, personnel should have access to and knowledge of translation services.
B. ICE Standards/ Special Requirements
The contractor is required to perform in accordance with the ICE Performance Based National Detention Standards (PBNDS 2011), all ICE policies related to the transportation of juveniles (ICE Family Residential Standards) as well as the Flores Settlement Agreement (A legislative provision whose actualization into law arose primarily due to the adjudication of the Reno v. Flores trial proceeding by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1993), the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 [Codified into the federal registry as the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, signed into law by George W. Bush], and the Homeland Security Act of 2002. In cases where other standards conflict with DHS/ICE Policy or Standards, DHS/ICE Policy and Standards will prevail. ICE Inspectors will conduct periodic inspections to assure compliance of the aforementioned standards.
Personnel shall have the knowledge and experience to transport individual children with special needs. Often times, children with special needs may require a transportation method that is time saving and direct, i.e. by commercial airline. Contractor shall also provide for accompanying medical care. Additionally, due to exigent circumstances, the Contractor shall be required to transport juveniles via ground to HUB airports or other staging areas that are not located within the area of initial apprehension.
The Contractor shall follow a fully developed training curriculum and transporting staff shall have the highest level of competency possible. Areas of training shall include, but are not limited to the following: Airport rules and regulations for travelers, crisis intervention, child development, working with and transporting youth with special needs, transporting youth with behavioral problems, CPR & First Aid training, non-secured UAC policy and procedures and the implementation of contingency plans in the event of a crisis during transport, which include de-escalation techniques.
Background Investigations and Suitability Screenings will be conducted on all Contract Employees by the Office of Professional Responsibility and Personnel Security Unit (OPR-OSU).
The Contractor shall agree that each employee working on this contract will successfully pass the DHS Employment Eligibility (E-Verify) program operated by USICS to establish work authorization and U.S. Citizenship.
Employees must reside in the United States.
C. Contract Type
The Government anticipates awarding a five (5) year Fixed Price Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract vehicle consisting of a one year base period, and four (4) option years. The Service Contract Act - is applicable to this acquisition. All required clauses, provisions will be included in the solicitation and resulting contractual instrument.
The anticipated release date of the solicitation is March 3, 2014. The solicitation closing date will be thirty (30) days after release of the Request for Proposal (RFP).
Projected Set-Aside: All business sizes are welcome to participate; however, ICE is trying to determine small business interest, particularly HubZone companies. All information received in response in to this notice will be used to determine the appropriateness of any small business set-aside for this requirement.
D. Place of Performance:
Service Area: Throughout the Continental United States (US)
The area(s) or region(s) serviced may occur either with a phased approach over a period of several months to a full year. Alternatively, the Contractor shall perform the entire transportation function upon full funding. For example, the following two circumstances may occur:
(1) The contractor could initially provide transportation services only in the Southwest Region of the U.S. for those juveniles who are apprehended in the state of Texas; or,
(2) The Contractor may be required to provide transportation services for all juveniles who are in DHS custody throughout the continental U.S.
E. RFI Purpose/Requirements
The purpose of this RFI is to obtain market information and capabilities for planning purposes and to determine appropriate strategies to meet the Agency's requirements. This RFI is issued solely for information and planning purposes and does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP) or a commitment for an RFP in the future. Responses to this notice are not considered offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract. Responders are advised that the Government will not pay for any information or administrative cost incurred in response to this announcement and information submitted in response to this RFI will not be returned.
Interested parties are instructed to submit the following information: (Note: Please do not exceed 5 pages per RFI submission)
POC information (name, title, phone number, address, email address, etc.)
Socio-economic status
Brief Company Capability statement (to include addressing all special needs as stated above)
F. Submissions and Point of Contact Information
Submit written or electronic submissions via email to Rachel.Ali@ice.dhs.gov by 1:00pm EST on Monday, February 19, 2014.
The most telling aspect pertaining to the release of this documentation pertains to the stipulated entries comprising section D of this particular article of reference, specifically subsections (1) and (2) which allow for the housing and transportation of all juveniles presently in the custody of DHS officials throughout the continental United States at taxpayer expense.
Further affirmation regarding the involvement of agencies within the Federal Government in the trafficking of undocumented immigrants across the continental United States is evidenced in the following series of illustrative composites, a sequence of visually inspired portrayals documenting the participatory role of political constituencies in America in this criminal enterprise through blanket enunciation:
President Obama himself, during the course of a syndicated public speaking event in Chicago, made the following proclamation:
“There have been periods where the folks who were already here suddenly say, ‘Well, I don’t want those folks,’ even though the only people who have the right to say that are some Native Americans.”
In yet another instance he is credited as the author of this utterance:
“Unless you’re one of the first Americans - a Native American - you came from someplace else. Somebody brought you.”
Of course each of these statements belie the true intentions of this political administration, to garner support for members of the Democratic National Committee from individuals claiming to possess ancestral ties to areas of Central and South America, and to placate certain assemblies through insinuations of injustice based solely on the prospect of some form of inherent cultural animus.
This prospect of intergovernmental collusion regarding the subject of illegal immigration is bolstered significantly with recent revelations regarding the Federal Government’s attempt to enlist the aid of various constituents throughout the public arena with the promise of non-taxable monthly stipends in the amount of $7,000, a fact evidenced in the following:
Other topics of interest regarding the economic impacts associated with the Obama Administration’s blatant refusal to actively enforce immigration policy - some of which can be aptly characterized as the resultant by-product of ‘willful’ negligence on the part of the political establishment - are examined in detail in the articles of reference appearing below:
Another crucial point of contention with regard to the subject of illegal immigration concerns the adoption of policies by local state government officials that are blatantly contradictory of legislation enacted at the federal level on September 30, 1996 - specifically the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act, also known as IIRIRA - that requires said institutions engage in cooperation with the Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement as a means of ensuring border security. This unspoken endorsement, oftentimes referred to as a type of “sanctuary” initiative, effectively prohibits city workers or employees from disclosing the whereabouts of illegal aliens residing in their communities to the Federal Government. This particular directive also eliminates the possibility of distinction between legal immigrants and those who have entered the United States illegally - a course of action allowing for the access of taxpayer funded government assistance programs and services by foreign nationals that remain unaccounted for. The following synopsis by Steve Salvi, a lengthy dissertation examining the inherent differences between the formal and informal interpretation of sanctuary policy, the principal motivations behind the reluctance of elected officials to actively enforce immigration law, and a confirmed state-by-state listing of towns and cities that now serve as agencies of asylum for undocumented immigrants elaborates on this topic of discussion in detail:
Examples of Formal Sanctuary Policies/ Legislative Mandate
The Governor of Maine instituted an Executive Order entitled “An Order Concerning Access to State Services By All Entitled Maine Residents,” in 2004. The Order limits state employee ability to report the presence of illegal aliens, which some people claim has resulted in many illegal aliens migrating to Maine seeking public benefits and valid Maine drivers licenses (which can be used to drive in other states).
In 2008, Gavin Newsom, who served as mayor of San Francisco at the time, publicized the city's sanctuary status in a press release for San Francisco’s Sanctuary City Outreach Program. Newsome later backtracked somewhat after news organizations began exposing how the city's sanctuary policy had protected illegal alien gang members that were committing serious crimes in San Francisco and elsewhere. In 2009, Newsome attempted to veto an ordinance passed by San Francisco’s even more radical Board of Supervisors which prohibited illegal aliens charged with crimes from being detained by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Newsom now serves as California’s Lt. Governor.
In Katy, Texas, publicity about re-offending illegal aliens also put pressure on that city's administration to rethink its sanctuary policy--at least for illegal aliens that commit felonies.
Informal Sanctuary Directives
An informal sanctuary policy is an ‘unwritten’ policy that is not formally documented on paper. Nonetheless, this informal sanctuary policy was established and sanctioned by a local government authority and carried out by its public employees (administrative, service, and or safety). Informal sanctuary policies are more difficult to document since no public record exists. Informal sanctuary policy can, however, be evidenced in other ways.
A local government’s (e.g., township, village, city, or county) interaction with illegal aliens can evidence an unwritten sanctuary policy. For example, does a police department contact ICE or release a suspect involved in a misdemeanor traffic stop after determining he or she is likely an illegal alien (or the alien admits to being in the U.S. illegally)?
Statements and actions by public official can indicate a community’s unwritten policy too. Did a mayor of a town hire illegal alien day laborers for a city project? Does a mayor, city administrator, or other city official complain to the press that illegal aliens in their community should not be subject to raids or arrests by ICE? Does a city council adopt a resolution in opposition to the enforcement of U.S. immigration laws? These actions and statements are indicators that an informal (unwritten) sanctuary policy may exist in a community.
The Principal Motivations Behind the Reluctance of Elected Officials to Actively Enforce Immigration Policy at the State and Local Levels of Government
One justification of creating sanctuary cities is often under the guise of protecting ‘immigrant rights.’ But illegal aliens are not immigrants. An immigrant is a person who entered the U.S. legally and maintains legal presence. When a person is illegally smuggled into the U.S. or violates their visa restrictions--he/ she is an unauthorized (illegal) alien subject to deportation under existing U.S. law.
Another false argument public officials use to justify sanctuary policies is safety. They ‘sell’ sanctuary policies to the naive public as effective “community policing” strategies. The argument goes as follows: Illegal aliens who are witnesses to or victims of crime won’t report them to police for fear of arrest and deportation. However, these political panderers ignore the fact that if illegal aliens were removed from the U.S., they would not be here to become victims. Criminal elements comprising these undocumented immigrant assemblies that actively prey on the community would have been deported too.
Why do public officials pass sanctuary laws or establish unwritten “don’t ask--don’t tell” policies? There are a variety of reasons. Some politicians attempt to appease illegal immigration support groups such as the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), Mexican American Legal Defense & Education Fund (MALDEF), and League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), or other immigration activist groups that lobby local governments to implement formal or informal sanctuary policies. Other reasons include political contributions and ethnic voter support at election time; complacency, ignorance, or ‘don’t care’ attitudes; and purposeful resistance to existing U.S. immigration law based upon an open-border political philosophy that may serve their economic, political, or ethnocentric interests. A great number of politically appointed big city police chief’s often support an administration’s sanctuary policy because they share a similar political ideology or just want to keep their job. It’s much easier too for city officials to collect their paychecks and avoid the political protests and threats of expensive lawsuits that routinely follow attempts by cities to stop illegal aliens from taking root in their communities.
The Obama Administration has been quick to file lawsuits against any state or local government attempting to crack down on illegal aliens in their jurisdictions. However, when cities openly violate federal law by aiding illegal aliens, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson audaciously claims that the Obama administration is helpless in stopping the practice. Johnson also opposes any attempts by the US Congress to pass legislation to end the practice. The Department of Justice has reportedly pressured DHS in the past not to interfere with cities with sanctuary policies.
Comprehensive Listing of Sanctuary Cities Within the United States
Alaska
Anchorage, AK (6/13/07 Congressional Research Service) (7-29-10 The Municipality of Anchorage disputes the listing. See notes at bottom of page for details)
Arizona
Chandler, AZ (Added 5/30/07, Congressional Research Service Report, 2006. The city disputes its listing)
Mesa, AZ (Added 10-18-09, Sources: Judicial Watch; East Valley Tribune article, 1-4-2008)*
Phoenix, AZ
Tucson, AZ (Added 11-12-07, Source: 11-11-07 story by Brady McCombs, Arizona Daily Star. See note below)
California
Bell Gardens, CA
City of Industry, CA
City of Commerce, CA
Coachella, CA (Added 7-23-12, Source: La Voz de Aztlan. Passed in 2006 and existence supported by quotes in city’s 9-12-07 council meeting minutes)
Cypress, CA
Davis CA
Downey, CA
Fresno, CA (6/13/07 Congressional Research Service. City disputes its listing claiming CRS could not provide source of its research)
Greenfield, CA (Added 7-23-12, Source: Battle at the ballot box in Greenfield, Monterey County, The Herald, 6-1-12)
Los Angeles, CA (Congressional Research Service)
Long Beach, CA
Lynwood, CA
Maywood, CA
Montebello, CA
National City, CA
Norwalk, CA
Oakland, CA (Added 8-27-07. Source: 4/25/07 story by KCBS 740 AM. Link corroborating this assertion has since been removed, presumably by its original authors as a means of concealing incriminating evidence)
Paramount, CA
Pico Rivera, CA
Richmond, CA (Added 11-5-09. Sources: Mayor Gayle McLaughlin’s campaign website from 2004, 2006)
South Gate, CA
San Bernardino, Ca. (Added 6/7/07, reader submitted/ 9/5/08. Listing disputed by the city administration.* See additional notes)
San Diego, CA (Sources: Congressional Research Service; SDPD chief endorses controversial immigration bill, Fox-TV 5, 9-2-13)
Santa Clara County, CA (Added 11-29-10, source: Forced into Immigration Enforcement, A County Considers Plan B, 10-21-10, Huffington Post.)
Santa Cruz, CA (Added 5/30/07, documented by KSBW news)
San Francisco, CA (Congressional Research Service)
San Jose, CA (6/13/07 Congressional Research Service)
Santa Maria, CA (11-18-08 Submitted research from local activist/ listing disputed by the city administration)
Sonoma County, CA (Congressional Research Service)
Vernon, CA
Watsonville, CA (Added 5/30/07, documented by KSBW news)
Wilmington, CA
Colorado
Aurora, CO
Commerce City, CO
Denver, CO (Source: Congressional Research Service)
Durango, CO (6/13/07 Congressional Research Service)
Federal Heights, CO
Fort Collins, CO
Lafayette, CO (Added 6/3/07, documented by reader)
Thornton, CO (City disputes its listing)
Westminster, CO
Connecticut
Hartford, CT (Added 5/4/10. Source: [Ordinance passed in 2008], NEWS 21 Blog, by Amy Crawford, Hartford, CT)
New Haven, CT (Added 6/4/07. Source: TV News 8: City council votes 25-1 to issue ID cards to illegal aliens)
Florida
DeLeon Springs, FL
Deltona, FL
Jupiter, FL (Added 4-13-09. Previously on watch list.)
Lake Worth, FL (Added 4-13-09.)
Miami, FL
Georgia
Dalton, GA (Added 5/30/07. 6/18/07 Listing disputed by the City of Dalton, GA. City’s written policy requested, not received as of 1-28-12)
Illinois
Chicago, IL (Congressional Research Service)
Cicero, IL (6/13/07 Congressional Research Service)
Evanston, IL (6/13/07 Congressional Research Service)
Iowa
(See city watch list below)
Kansas
Wichita (Source: Police department policy exposed after the death of Lola Jayne, KSN TV-3, 12-19-08)
Louisiana
New Orleans, LA (Source: Police department announced policy of “don't ask, don’t tell,” by Police superintendent Warren Riley, WWL-TV; 9-9-09)
Massachusetts
Cambridge, MA (Source: Boston Globe. First passed resolution in 1985)
Chelsea, MA (Added: 8-14-07 Source: Chelsea government website with text of sanctuary policy)
Northampton, MA (Added 6-20-12 Source: City of Northampton Resolution dated 8-18-2011. Resolution limits cooperation with ICE but does not use the term “sanctuary”)
Orleans, MA (Added 6/13/07 Congressional Research Service)
Sommerville, MA (Added 7-23-12 Original resolution passed in 1987, later repealed and replaced with Safe City Resolution. Source: Sommerville News Blog, 10-15-2007)
Springfield, MA (Disputed)
Maine
Portland (Added 5/31/07 Note: Maine resident reported that Portland city council passed sanctuary legislation)
State of Maine (Added 5/31/07 Note: Governor of Maine initiated de facto protections for illegals by Executive Order in 2004)*
Maryland
Baltimore, MD (Congressional Research Service)
Gaithersburg, MD (Disputed by city 7-10-15. As of 9-8-15, the city has not forwarded a copy of its policy regarding illegal alien in Gaithersburg)
Mt. Rainier, MD (Added 1-20-08, Source: The Washington D.C. Examiner, 1-19-08)
Montgomery County, MD (Added 11-3-09, Source: Frederick County sheriff worried about MontCo gangs, The Washington D.C. Examiner, 11-2-09)
Takoma Park, MD (Reported that City ordinance passed some 20 years ago; Congressional Research Service)
Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI (6/13/07 Congressional Research Service)
Detroit, MI (6/13/07 Congressional Research Service)
Minnesota
Austin, MN (Added 11-1-11 Source: Protecting illegal immigrants to catch criminals, Star Tribune, 10-27-11)*
Minneapolis, MN (Congressional Research Service)
St. Paul, MN
Worthington, MN (Added 5-30-07 Note: This is where a Swift plant was raided by ICE in December, 2006. Worthington disputes its listing)
Nevada
Reno (Added 5-31-07; 2-18-08 Disputed by city)
New Jersey
Camden, NJ (Added in 2007; latest source: Camden, Immigrant Haven?, By Lauren Feeney, City Paper, 7-16-08)
*(The Borough of Fort Lee removed pending review of its compliance with IIRIRA. The city disputes its listing as a sanctuary)
Hightstown, NJ (Added 5-30-07, the city disputes its listing as a sanctuary)
Aztec, NM Added 5-8-10, Identified by CRS in 2006 report to Congress. (The city disputes its listing, however, it has not forwarded a copy of its policy)
Rio Ariba County, NM (6/13/07 Congressional Research Service)
Santa Fe, NM (6/13/07 Congressional Research Service; 1-26-12 AP story, Santa Fe Mayor David Coss opposes taking drivers licenses away from illegal aliens)
New York
Albany, NY (Added 7-22-09 Source: Council adopts don’t ask policy, Times Union report by Jordan Carleo-Evangelist)
Bay Shore, NY
Brentwood, NY
Central Islip, NY
Farmingville, NY
New York City, NY
Riverhead, NY
Shirly/Mastic, NY
Spring Valley Village, NY (Added 7-25-07)
Uniondale, NY
Westbury, NY
North Carolina
Carrboro, NC (Added 11-12-07 Source: Towns differ on illegal aliens by Patrick Winn, The News & Observer)
Chapel Hill, NC (Added 11-12-07 Source: Towns differ on illegal aliens by Patrick Winn, The News & Observer)
Charlotte, NC
Chatham County, NC (Added 1-14-09 Source: Chatham rejects immigration program, The News & Observer; Chatham County Commissioners Board Minutes, 1-5--09)
Durham, NC (6/13/07 Congressional Research Service)
Raleigh
Winston-Salem
Ohio
Columbus, OH (7/5/07 Source: 5/10/07 Columbus Dispatch article stating illegal aliens in misdemeanor cases are not reported to ICE) See more below.
Dayton, OH (Added 1-11-10 Source: Dayton Daily News story by Lucas Sullivan. Police chief prohibits officers from asking about immigration status)
Lake County, OH (Added 7-23-15 Source: Lake County accepts fraudulent Mexican Matricular Consular ID cards used by illegal aliens)
Lima, OH (Added 10-28-08 Source: City administration opposes County Sheriff’s efforts to remove illegal aliens)
Lorain, OH (Added 4-21-14 Source: Lorain Police Chief Celestino Rivera has ordered - by written policy - his officers not to cooperate with ICE) See additional notes below.
Lucas County, OH (Added 7-23-15 Source: Lucas County accepts fraudulent Mexican Matricular Consular ID cards used by illegal aliens)
Oberlin, OH (Added 1-25-09. Source: City Resolution adopted January 20, 2009)
Painesville, OH (7-19-07 Source: In 2006, the city of Painesville in an official letter called illegal aliens (they used the word “undocumented” a valuable asset to the city and opposed immigration law enforcement legislation. Although the city of Painesville passed a Resolution in support of immigration law enforcement as a result of public pressure, the city remains in opposition to aggressive immigration law enforcement and the deportation of the illegal alien population in the community)
Oklahoma
Oklahoma City (de facto)
Tulsa (6-3-07 Note: Tulsa city council is discussing changing its sanctuary policy. 8-15-10 Update: See note below)
Oregon
Ashland, OR (8-9-07 Congressional Research Service)
Gaston, OR (8-9-07 Congressional Research Service)
Marion County, OR (8-9-07 Congressional Research Service)
Multnomah County, OR (Added 11-9-13 Source: Sheriff’s office says ‘no’ to ICE, By Kirsten Lock, Fox TV-12, 4-25-13)
Portland, OR
State of Oregon* (8-9-07 Congressional Research Service) (See note below)*
Virginia Beach, VA (Added 6/3/07. Note: The city adopted an administrative directive on 8-1-08 allowing VBPD limited authority to inquire about immigration status. Based on this directive, the city disputes its sanctuary status. Despite the directive, the city has not provided statistical evidence of enforcement to date)
Washington
King Co. Council, WA (Added as a de facto sanctuary on 6-28-09 Source: The Seattle Times; and on 11-9-09 Ordinance passed)
Seattle, WA (Added 5/30/07; Congressional Research Service)
Spokane, WA (Added 6-22-15; City Council passed Ordinances C35164 and C-35167)
Wisconsin
Madison, WI (Congressional Research Service) Update: In June, 2010, the city council passed a resolution reaffirming its policy.
Milwaukee County, WI (Added 6-10-12 Source article: County Board Resolution on Immigration on target, Opinion, Journal Sentinel News., 6-9-12)
Jackson Hole, WY
Washington, D.C. (Update: The Washington D.C. city council has voted to prohibit its police department from participating in the Secure Communities program in July, 2010 according to an AP story by Ivan Moreno dated 7-26-10; 10-19-11 D.C. Examiner story which states that Mayor Vincent Gray signed an order prohibiting the city’s police dept. from inquiring about a person’s immigration status.
Toledo, OH (Source: 7-12-15 Personal research by longtime immigration researcher)
Lucas County, OH (Source: 7-12-15 Personal research by longtime immigration researcher)
Sanctuary Cities in the United States: Additional Notes
Anchorage, AK
The Municipality of Anchorage is actively disputing its status as a safe haven for illegal aliens. It claims that the Congressional Research Service’s listing of the city as a “sanctuary” was based on a Resolution adopted by its Assembly (AR 2003-223) in 2003. The Municipal Attorney Dennis Wheeler says that that Resolution was rescinded on December 18, 2007.
Mesa, Arizona
Mesa Arizona has been added as a sanctuary city list because of its reported “don’t ask don't tell policy” and criticism by the local sheriff that the city is not enforcing the law. The sheriff has arrested illegal aliens working in city buildings (as contract workers for a private cleaning company), reportedly after the city police department refused to investigate complaints of illegal hires by a whistleblower.
Austin, MN
Note: The newspaper incorrectly refers to illegal aliens as “illegal immigrants.” Aliens who illegally reside in the U.S. are not “immigrants,” a term that should only refer to aliens who legally “emigrated” to the United States.
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia’s Mayor signed an Executive Order in November 2009 that provided additional protections to illegal aliens in the city. However, the City of Philadelphia does have an existing Preliminary Arraignment Reporting System (PARS) agreement with ICE. Mayor Nutter objects to the PARS computer technology agreement which is now up for renewal. The Mayor apparently believes that the access of data by ICE will result in increased immigration violation investigations and deportations. Here is an article by the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Tucson, Arizona
Tucson Arizona has been added to the sanctuary city list because the Tucson police have instituted a new policy which prevents their officers from calling Immigration and Customs Enforcement to schools and churches.
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Tulsa city councilor Jim Mautino was quoted in a Tulsa World article by P.J. Lassek, that he believes Tulsa is a sanctuary city and that the Police don’t verify legal presence during traffic stops. Mautino wants to crack down on illegal aliens and introduce an ordinance mandating the use of E-Verify because the resolution that was passed cannot be enforced.
State of Oregon
According to a CRS report (October, 2005), Oregon passed a law in 1987 that prohibits local and state law enforcement from using state resources for locating and capturing illegal aliens. Law enforcement was permitted [but not required] to “exchange information” with federal immigration officials if an illegal alien was arrested for a crime.
San Bernardino, CA
San Bernardino was added to the list on June 6th of 2007 as a result of a readers submission.
Columbus, OH
The Columbus Dispatch [Ohio] wrote: “The police didn’t contact immigration authorities concerning those who were determined to be undocumented, Booth said. Authorities say that’s typical when it comes to misdemeanor charges.” [Columbus, Ohio]
Lorain, OH
“Thanks to Cel (Celestino Rivera, Lorain’s Police Chief), we are less worried” [about the US Border Patrol] said one interviewee who has a family member who is deportable. Rivera does not report illegal aliens to immigration authorities. Source: Ohio, the Other Border, By Maribel Hastings, Senior Adviser, America’s Voice, 4-7-14.
Painesville, OH
Cleveland Scene (7-18-07) quotes the Painesville Police Chief Gary Smith:
***He [Police Chief Gary Smith] has no qualms about laying out his indifference in plain English: “We don’t care what your [immigration] status is.” ***
Oklahoma City, OK
One reader wrote about Oklahoma City:
Oklahoma City is a sanctuary city de facto. Police officers have been told not to stop any Hispanic for minor traffic violations, because they have a good chance of being illegal and it is a waste of time. The City has not been enforcing City Code if the recipient of the code violation doesn't speak English. And is not attempting to enforce the single-family dwelling laws.
State of Maine
Governor John E. Baldacci issued executive order 13 FY 04/05 which was issued on April 9, 2004. The order is entitled “An Order Concerning Access to State Services by All Entitled Maine Residents.” The order prohibits state workers from inquiring about the immigration status of anyone applying for services.
State of Vermont
Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell reportedly has asked police in Vermont to adopt a “don’t ask, don’t tell” approach to immigration status under the guise of “Bias-Free Policing.” Police departments in Vermont will get a copy of the request but are not required to adopt the attorney general’s policy.
Alexandria, VA
Resolution No. 2246, adopted October 9, 2007 states in part: “...the City and its various agencies will neither make inquirers about nor report on the citizenship of those who seek the protection of its laws or the use of its services.” Evidently in Alexandria, illegal aliens are safe from Immigration and Customs Enforcement until they commit a “serious” crime. So what crimes can illegals commit with impunity from the federal government? Theft? Rape? Drug dealing? Gang activity?
Research Resources (incomplete listing)
Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress
CRS Report for Congress, Enforcing Immigration Law: The Role of State and Local Law Enforcement, Updated August 14, 2006
CONCLUSION: What has been made abundantly clear with regard to this particular entry is the fact that the current political administration, as well as a vast majority of those that foreshadowed its institution, have willfully chosen to shirk their responsibilities as elected officials and place the future of America in the hands of undocumented assemblies, the notion of which is evident in the following:
These developments in and of themselves would be alarming to even the most dispassionate of observers, however, the true scope of this particular crisis was ushered into existence long before this sequence of events ever attained precedence, facts alluded to in the following:
The Historical Significance of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and How Its Passage in 1994 Effectively Altered the Concept of National Sovereignty in the United States
The concept of boundary, or the sovereign distinction of nations - in this instance the border geography separating the United States from Mexico and portions of Central America - has always been an issue of contention between rightwing conservatives and the proponents of immigration reform, with both sides of the political spectrum recognized as the active participants of one of many carefully concealed strategies devised by the Elitist Patriarchy as a means of emphasizing the necessity of ignorance in the public venue. Nowhere is this more evident than in the following revelation:
According to Timothy A. Pope, the founder, syndicated author, and investigative researcher for America the Battlefield, the concept of border autonomy regarding the existence of territorial lines of demarcation is an issue that has long since been reconciled. The written context associated with this particular discovery is as follows:
Buried within the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which came into force on January 1, 1994, is the La Paz Agreement between the United States and Mexico. This agreement was signed by Ronald Reagan in 1983 and added to NAFTA in 1997. It eliminated the U.S.-Mexico border. That’s right. It didn’t push the border back, it ELIMINATED it altogether. It’s called Border Region XXI (you know, ‘21,’ like U.N. Agenda 21 for the 21st Century), under the “Sustainable Development” initiative. Also the U.S. and Mexican border agencies were COMBINED under the NAFTA/ U.N. agreements, and similar unlawful agreements have been made under the World Trade Organization’s multilateral General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) between the United States and Canada.
More information regarding the legislative significance of the prior stated directive appears below:
The La Paz Agreement as an Instrument of Globalist Expansionism | Engineering the Eradication of Border Autonomy Between the United States, Mexico, and Portions of Central America
What the La Paz agreement did was to establish a fiefdom headed up by unelected government employees - giving them virtually unlimited power to expand their areas of confluence with the power to recruit an army of non-governmental organizations (NGO) to lobby for them. Essentially the areas included in the La Paz fiefdom were commandeered from the states in which they resided.
As I read this, my understanding is that the border region became a separate and independent international zone between Mexico and the U.S. Effectively, they were internationalizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with this agreement. They also provided a means to get financing outside the normal funding streams of the U.S. Congress - like from the United Nations, for example, or from private donors like David Rockefeller.
This is UN regionalization - divide and conquer. Regionalization is a cannibalizing force against representative government. It usurps power (and property in this case) from elected officials - giving it to unelected and unaccountable committees and commissions. This is the communist system of governance - appointed apparatchiks working in concert to determine and implement policy and regulations (law) by fiat. So in effect, the EPA was a Herald Patch - a cancerous seed of international communism in our country.
The dissolution of America’s national sovereignty should be recognized for that which its authors have intended: a means to an end whereby the actualization of a planetary system of governance under UN (United Nations) mandate can proceed unabated through the establishment of a internationalist consortium comprised of 10 regional districts - the most notable of which referencing a 134-page written publication authored by Charles W. Taylor in January of 1992 and released by the United States Army War College Strategic Studies Institute - an expansive summation entitled: ‘A World 2010: A New Order of Nations,’ that detailed the revision of an earlier strategy implemented by the Globalist Patriarchy projecting the emergence of a one world system of governance by the target year 2000:
NOTE: The migrant/ refugee crisis afflicting considerable portions of the European Union is not mentioned in this article due to the fact that the reasons surrounding its present state of affairs pertain more to the geopolitical establishment’s desire to alter its political infrastructure, national identity, and cultural demographic as a means of effecting the creation of an Islamic Superstate (the evidence of which is presented below in the form of illustration) - a sequence of events coinciding with the 19th fundamental tenet of the Illuminati/ New World Order manifesto that will be the subject of a future entry.
Figure 1. Cartographical amalgam detailing the Islamic State’s, formerly known as ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria or the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shām) or ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant), plan to effect the establishment of a transnational Islamic fundamentalist empire extending from portions of Western Europe (inclusive of Spain, a territory to be rechristened as Andalus - presumably in recognition of Islam’s dominance of the region during the Middle Ages), the Northern periphery of the African continent (including the Western Sahara, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Mauritania, Mali, Niger, Chad, Sudan, Eritrea, Djibouti, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Ethiopia, Sudan, Somalia, Cameroon, Uganda, and the Central African Republic and a host of other lesser nations), and Eastern Europe (Austria, Bulgaria, Romania, etcetera) in 5 years time.
¹ U.S.C. Title 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURES • Part 1—CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725) and U.S.C. Title 26—INTERNAL REVENUE CODE • Subtitle F—Procedure and Administration, Chapter 75—CRIMES, OTHER OFFENSES, AND FORFEITURES Subchapters A and B (§§ 7201 – 7241), both of which exist as the foundation for the classification of illegal activities, particularly criminal offenses satisfying federal jurisdictional criterion, within the current United States penal structure
¹ Characterized as the causation of debilitating illness, the onset of deleterious physiological complications, and/ or the manifestation of symptoms related to disease progression resulting from the application of diagnostic or therapeutic procedures by a practicing physician, oftentimes in a nosocomial (hospital or medical facility) setting.
DISCLAIMER: A 2010 federal study encompassing the time frame of 12/1/2007-9/30/2010 commissioned by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and conducted by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc. – a Harvard University Medical School consultation services affiliate – on behalf of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) determined that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events” are ever reported to VAERS (Link). These findings indicated in the ‘Results subsection’ of the document with the paragraph in question appearing below:
Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.
This data irregularity pertaining to documented instances of inimical reactions to clinically approved agents of inoculation conflicts with the actual number of unreported cases by a factor of 100. When put into perspective, using figures obtained through information accessed from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-funded VAERS Wonder System on May 7, 2021 as a statistical baseline, these numerical inconsistencies, paired in conjunction with documentation released in 2010 by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc., demonstrate that the acknowledged premature death total of 3,919 is, in actuality, more accurately represented as 391,900.
ADVERSE IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSES • INDEXED BY ADVERSE REACTION
EUROPEAN UNION
UNITED KINGDOM
Adverse Immunological Responses Relevant to the Administration of COVID-19 Vaccines in a Clinical Setting Indexed by Vaccine Manufacturer (MedDRA | COVID Vaccine Data: Current ICH-Accredited Adverse Event Reporting System Analysis)
DISCLAIMER: The itemized registry of clinical diagnoses present in this survey representative of documented instances of adverse immunological responses relevant to the administration of COVID-19-specific agents of inoculation, specifically the mRNA Pfizer/ BioNTech and Oxford University/ AstraZeneca vaccine-based derivatives.
¹ Appearing under the ‘Coronavirus Infections’ subsection, the COVID-19 entry inclusive of breakthrough infections.
² The thrombocytopenic entries comprising this itemized portfolio detailed below:
³ The term, ‘Anaphylaxis,’ outlined in the ‘Anaphylactic and Anaphylactoid Responses’ subsection of each document, a data registry that includes the following:
⁴ The itemized entry ‘Heart Attacks/ Cardiac Arrest,’ inclusive of the following clinical assessments:
Acute Myocardial Infarction Myocardial Infarction
⁵ The ‘Neoplasm’ subsection detailed in this archive consisting of benign designated entries – more aptly characterized as cysts absent the presence of secondary/ associative malignancies – as well as the physiological manifestation of carcinomatous excrescencies, commonly referred to as cancerous growths or tumors.
⁶ The itemized entry ‘Miscarriages,’ referred to as ‘Abortions Spontaneous’ in each report.
⁷ The inclusion of the autoimmune disease, ‘Lupus,’ referring to the itemized entry of ‘Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE),’ the scientific equivalent for the condition.
ABBREVIATIONAL INDEX
AIDS – Acquired ImmunoDeficiency Syndrome
GBS – Guillain-Barré Syndrome
ICH – International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use
MedDRA – Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities
DISCLAIMER: Discrepancies remain in the statistical interpretation of adverse physiological responses resulting from the administration of COVID-19 vaccines in a nosocomial (hospital or medical facility) setting with the following graphic illustrating the presence of data irregularities by MedAlerts.org and OpenVAERS in the tabulation of figures for both Anaphylaxis and Bell’s Palsy for the week of 1/07/2022:
Adverse Reaction
MedAlerts.org
OpenVAERS
Anaphylaxis
42,265
9,262
Bell’s Palsy
9,006
14,157
¹ The thrombosis (blood clot)/ stroke-related entries comprising this itemized portfolio detailed below:
NOTE – Occlusions, specifically those impacting the arterial circuit, have been included in this itemized registry, as a vast majority of clinical estimations applicable to this category are the by product of an embolic obstruction or thrombotic impediment.
² Each of the infarction-designated records chronicled in this listing are presented as follows:
³ The cancer-specific assessments detailed in this archive including, but not limited to, the following:
Adrenal Gland Cancer Adrenal Gland Cancer Metastatic Anal Cancer Anal Cancer Stage 0 Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Appendix Cancer Bile Duct Cancer Bladder Cancer Bladder Cancer Stage IV Bone Cancer Bone Cancer Metastatic Brain Cancer Metastatic Breast Cancer Breast Cancer (Female) Breast Cancer In Situ Breast Cancer (Male) Breast Cancer Metastatic Breast Cancer (Recurrent) Breast Cancer Stage I Breast Cancer Stage II Breast Cancer Stage III Breast Cancer Stage IV Cervix Cancer Metastatic Colon Cancer Colon Cancer Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Cancer Metastatic Endometrial Cancer Fallopian Tube Cancer Fallopian Tube Cancer Metastatic Gallbladder Cancer Gastric Cancer Gastric Cancer Stage I Hepatic Cancer Hepatic Cancer Metastatic Hepatic Cancer Stage IV Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Hormone Refractory Breast Cancer Large Cell Lung Cancer Laryngeal Cancer Lip and/or Oral Cavity Cancer Lip and/or Oral Cavity Cancer (Recurrent) Lung Cancer Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV Oesophageal Cancer Metastatic Ovarian Cancer Ovarian Cancer Stage III Ovarian Cancer Stage IV Ovarian Epithelial Cancer Papillary Thyroid Cancer Pituitary Cancer Metastatic Precancerous Cells (Present) Precancerous Condition Precancerous Mucosal Lesion Precancerous Skin Lesion Prostate Cancer Prostate Cancer Metastatic Prostate Cancer (Recurrent) Prostate Cancer Stage IV Rectal Cancer Rectal Cancer Metastatic Rectal Cancer Stage IV Rectosigmoid Cancer Recurrent Cancer Renal Cancer Renal Cancer Metastatic Skin Cancer Small Cell Lung Cancer Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic Small Cell Lung Cancer (Unspecified Stage) Testis Cancer Throat Cancer Thyroid Cancer Thyroid Cancer Stage 0 Thyroid Cancer Stage IV Thyroid Gland Cancer Tonsil Cancer Triple Positive Breast Cancer Uterine Cancer Vaginal Cancer Vulval Cancer Vulval Cancer Stage 0
⁴ The inclusion of the autoimmune disease, ‘Lupus,’ referring to the itemized entry of ‘Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE),’ the scientific equivalent for the condition.
Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies)
1,954
4.62%
MedImmune Vaccines, Inc.**
2
0.005%
Merck & Co. Inc.
8
0.02%
Moderna Therapeutics
17,009
40.24%
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics
1
0.002%
Pfizer/ BioNTech
24,219
57.3%
Protein Sciences Corporation***
5
0.01%
Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio
26
0.06%
Seqirus, Inc.****
37
0.09%
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.*****
1
0.002%
Undisclosed Manufacturers
342
0.81%
TOTAL
†43,638
†103.25%
† DISCLAIMER: Due to the fact that a number of the incidents detailed within this itemized inventory account for multiple agents of inoculation being administered to various segments of the civilian population to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 contagion, a single case can satisfy the necessary criteria to qualify for inclusion into a plethora of entries occupying this graphic. The cataloged instances of these anomalies resolving numerical inconsistencies in the ‘Total Count’ (where the aggregate number of documented cases of 42,265 is exceeded by 1,373) and ‘Total Percentage’ (where 103.25% exceeds the 100% mathematical threshold) appendices.
ᴬ Percentage calculations pertaining to each individual entry obtained from the most recent Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) official estimate of 42,265 with lower cataloged rates of incidence rounded to the nearest one thousandth decimal approximation.
¹ This report encompassing all medical conditions related to the cataloged incidence of Anaphylaxis, including facial swelling, Henoch-Schönlein Purpura³ (HSP, also referred to as Immunoglobin-A, or IgA, vasculitis), and urticaria (hives).
² The date ranges of 12/14/2020 to 2/18/2022 representing the most recent estimates relevant to the public release of vaccines by thirteen of the fourteen principal manufacturers in the United States – CSL Limited, Dynavax Technologies Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies), MedImmune Vaccines, Inc., Merck & Co. Inc., Moderna Therapeutics, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Pfizer/ BioNTech, Protein Sciences Corporation, Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio, Seqirus, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., with only the Oxford University/ AstraZeneca pharmacological variants excluded from the survey’s calculation.
Influenza A Virus Subtype H1N1 (Hemagglutinin Type 1 and Neuraminidase Type 1, commonly referred to as “Swine Flu”), measles, typhoid, cholera, yellow fever, pneumococcal infections, tuberculosis (a bacterial infection treated through the application of the Bacillus Calmette–Guérin, or BCG, vaccines), and Hepatitis B (Link).
* Founded in 1916 as the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories, CSL Limited is an Australian multinational biotechnology firm specializing in the production and development of antivenom, blood plasma derivatives, vaccines, and cell culture reagents (amino acid supplements, antibiotics, et al.) used in various medical and genetic research-based applicative studies. In October of 2014, CSL Limited acquired Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics for $275 million USD, merging the two businesses into a compartmentalized operations affiliate known as bioCSL. In November of the following year, bioCSL was rebranded as Seqirus, Inc., a process facilitating the establishment of the world’s second largest influenza vaccine manufacturing and distribution company.
** MedImmune Vaccines, Inc. is the global biologics research and developmental affiliate of AstraZeneca that was acquired on April 23, 2007, through a corporate merger in the amount of $15.2 billion USD. The service branch of the newly purchased immunological products agency subsequently combined with Cambridge Antibody Technology – a biotechnology firm obtained by AstraZeneca in 2006 – for the express purpose of facilitating the establishment of a biopharmaceutical division that was presented to investors on December 7, 2007, as part of a financial marketing strategy that emphasized MedImmune’s rebranding as a vital prerequisite in the promotion of intranasal novel H1N1 influenza vaccine-based derivatives to the general public.
*** Protein Sciences Corporation is a biotechnology firm based in Meriden, Connecticut, that was acquired by Sanofi Pasteur, one of five global business units comprising Sanofi (the other subsidiaries being Consumer Healthcare, Diabetes and Cardiovascular, General Medicines and Emerging Markets, and Sanofi Genzyme), through corporate merger in the amount of $750 million USD on August 28, 2017, following approval from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Established in 1983 as a privately held business, Protein Sciences Corporation patented the development of a genetically modified baculovirus expression system technology (B.E.S.T.) platform for use in the production of recombinant DNA (rDNA) signatures. Developed in conjunction with an attenuated version of the rHA0 (recombinant Hemagglutinin 0) virus and cultivated through the integration of cultured arthropodal (insect) cell lines, this technology utilized by the biopharmaceutical company to facilitate the manufacture and commercialized promotion of an intramuscularly administered subvirion trivalent influenza vaccine as an alternative to embryonated egg sample-driven agents of inoculation that are routinely marketed to adults in the 18-65 year age demographic.
**** A pharmaceutical industry affiliate of Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics specializing in the manufacture and distribution of influenza vaccines.
***** A corporate subsidiary of the Petah Tikva, Israel-based organization Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., that was founded in 1945 as a manufacturer of generic drugs to consumers as an affordable option to their branded equivalents. The North Wales, Pennsylvania, headquartered company the subject of numerous legal disputes, most notably a 543-page civil complaint filed in December of 2016 by the attorneys general of 46 states, including the District of Columbia and four U.S. territories, accusing the institution of a coordinated scheme to artificially maintain and ensure elevated market values for generic derivatives of more than 80 medications, with violations involving the sale and distribution of Xalatan (the trade or brand name of Latanoprost, a prescription medication for the treatment of high eye pressure/ intraocular pressure, or IOP, in patients exhibiting symptoms consistent with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension), Differin (a Vitamin A derivative of a gel-based retinoid designed to address acne), Dilantin (generic variant phenytoin, an anti-epileptic/ anticonvulsant drug used to inhibit seizures), Lotrimin AF Cream (the brand name of Clotrimazole, an anti-fungal medicine used in the treatment of diaper rash, oral thrush, pityriasis versicolor, vaginal yeast infections, and several types of ringworm including athlete’s foot and jock itch), and Ritalin (generic name methylphenidate, an orally administered central nervous system stimulant used in the treatment of attention deficit disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and narcolepsy) being widely publicized. This clandestine price fixing operation, where the average cost of select items were surreptitiously inflated by a margin of 1000% of their actual market estimation, conducted by the Actavis unit of Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the Sandoz unit of Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Mylan, and Pfizer Inc, among others.
Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies)
442
19.1%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1
0.04%
Moderna Therapeutics
447
19.32%
Pfizer/ BioNTech
1,481
64%
Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio
4
0.17%
Seqirus, Inc.
1
0.04%
Undisclosed Manufacturers
33
1.43%
TOTAL
†2,415
†104.36%
† DISCLAIMER: Due to the fact that a number of the incidents detailed within this itemized inventory account for multiple agents of inoculation being administered to various segments of the civilian population to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 contagion, a single case can satisfy the necessary criteria to qualify for inclusion into a plethora of entries occupying this graphic. The cataloged instances of these anomalies resolving numerical inconsistencies in the ‘Total Count’ (where the aggregate number of documented cases of 2,314 is exceeded by 101) and ‘Total Percentage’ (where 104.36% exceeds the 100% mathematical threshold) appendices.
ᴬ Percentage calculations pertaining to each individual entry obtained from the most recent Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) official estimate of 2,314 with lower cataloged rates of incidence rounded to the nearest one hundredth decimal approximation.
¹ The date ranges of 12/14/2020 to 2/18/2022 representing the most recent estimates relevant to the public release of vaccines by eight of the fourteen principal manufacturers in the United States – CSL Limited, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies), Merck & Co., Inc., Moderna Therapeutics, Pfizer/ BioNTech, Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio, and Seqirus, Inc., with the Dynavax Technologies Corporation, MedImmune Vaccines, Inc., Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Oxford University/ AstraZeneca, Protein Sciences Corporation, and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. pharmacological variants excluded from the survey’s calculation.
Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies)
469
5.21%
Merck & Co. Inc.
4
0.04%
Moderna Therapeutics
1,957
21.73%
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics
2
0.02%
Pfizer/ BioNTech
6,808
75.59%
Protein Sciences Corporation
1
0.01%
Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio
4
0.04%
Seqirus, Inc.
3
0.03%
Undisclosed Manufacturers
71
0.79%
TOTAL
†9,324
†103.53%
† DISCLAIMER: Due to the fact that a number of the incidents detailed within this itemized inventory account for multiple agents of inoculation being administered to various segments of the civilian population to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 contagion, a single case can satisfy the necessary criteria to qualify for inclusion into a plethora of entries occupying this graphic. The cataloged instances of these anomalies resolving numerical inconsistencies in the ‘Total Count’ (where the aggregate number of documented cases of 9,006 is exceeded by 318) and ‘Total Percentage’ (where 103.55% exceeds the 100% mathematical threshold) appendices.
ᴬ Percentage calculations pertaining to each individual entry obtained from the most recent Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) official estimate of 9,006 with lower cataloged rates of incidence rounded to the nearest one hundredth decimal approximation.
¹ This report encompassing all medical conditions related to the cataloged incidence of Bell’s Palsy, including facial asymmetry, dysmorphism, neuralgia, paralysis, and idiopathic hemifacial paresis.
² The date ranges of 12/14/2020 to 2/18/2022 representing the most recent estimates relevant to the public release of vaccines by nine of the fourteen principal manufacturers in the United States – GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies), Merck & Co., Inc., Moderna Therapeutics, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Pfizer/ BioNTech, Protein Sciences Corporation, Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio, and Seqirus, Inc., with the CSL Limited, Dynavax Technologies Corporation, MedImmune Vaccines, Inc., Oxford University/ AstraZeneca, and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. pharmacological derivatives excluded from the survey’s calculation.
Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies)
174
9.46%
Merck & Co. Inc.
1
0.05%
Moderna Therapeutics
474
25.76%
Pfizer/ BioNTech
1,239
67.34%
Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio
1
0.05%
Seqirus, Inc.
2
0.11%
Undisclosed Manufacturers
18
0.98%
TOTAL
†1,909
†103.75%
† DISCLAIMER: Due to the fact that a number of the incidents detailed within this itemized inventory account for multiple agents of inoculation being administered to various segments of the civilian population to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 contagion, a single case can satisfy the necessary criteria to qualify for inclusion into a plethora of entries occupying this graphic. The cataloged instances of these anomalies resolving numerical inconsistencies in the ‘Total Count’ (where the aggregate number of documented cases of 1,840 is exceeded by 69) and ‘Total Percentage’ (where 103.75% exceeds the 100% mathematical threshold) appendices.
ᴬ Percentage calculations pertaining to each individual entry obtained from the most recent Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) official estimate of 1,840 with lower cataloged rates of incidence rounded to the nearest one hundredth decimal approximation.
¹ The date ranges of 12/14/2020 to 2/18/2022 representing the most recent estimates relevant to the public release of vaccines by six of the fourteen principal manufacturers in the United States – Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies), Merck & Co. Inc., Moderna Therapeutics, Pfizer/ BioNTech, Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio, and Seqirus, Inc., with the CSL Limited, Dynavax Technologies Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, MedImmune Vaccines, Inc., Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Oxford University/ AstraZeneca, Protein Sciences Corporation, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. pharmacological derivatives omitted from the survey.
Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies)
176
9.84%
Merck & Co. Inc.
4
0.22%
Moderna Therapeutics
435
24.32%
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics
1
0.06%
Pfizer/ BioNTech
1,215
67.92%
Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio
2
0.11%
Seqirus, Inc.
1
0.06%
Undisclosed Manufacturers
18
1.01%
TOTAL
†1,855
†103.69%
† DISCLAIMER: Due to the fact that a number of the incidents detailed within this itemized inventory account for multiple agents of inoculation being administered to various segments of the civilian population to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 contagion, a single case can satisfy the necessary criteria to qualify for inclusion into a plethora of entries occupying this graphic. The cataloged instances of these anomalies resolving numerical inconsistencies in the ‘Total Count’ (where the aggregate number of documented cases of 1,789 is exceeded by 66) and ‘Total Percentage’ (where 103.69% exceeds the 100% mathematical threshold) appendices.
ᴬ Percentage calculations pertaining to each individual entry obtained from the most recent Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) official estimate of 1,789 with lower cataloged rates of incidence rounded to the nearest one hundredth decimal approximation.
¹ The date ranges of 12/14/2020 to 2/18/2022 representing the most recent estimates relevant to the public release of vaccines by eight of the fourteen principal manufacturers in the United States – GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies), Merck & Co., Inc., Moderna Therapeutics, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Pfizer/ BioNTech, Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio, and Seqirus, Inc., with the CSL Limited, Dynavax Technologies Corporation, MedImmune Vaccines, Inc., Oxford University/ AstraZeneca, Protein Sciences Corporation, and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. pharmacological derivatives omitted from the report.
Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies)
2,188
8.97%
MedImmune Vaccines, Inc.
1
0.004%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1
0.004%
Moderna Therapeutics
6,936
28.42%
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics
5
0.02%
Pfizer/ BioNTech
17,245
70.67%
Protein Sciences Corporation
1
0.004%
Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio
17
0.07%
Seqirus, Inc.
6
0.02%
Undisclosed Manufacturers
388
1.59%
TOTAL
†26,799
†109.82%
† DISCLAIMER: Due to the fact that a number of the incidents detailed within this itemized inventory account for multiple agents of inoculation being administered to various segments of the civilian population to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 contagion, a single case can satisfy the necessary criteria to qualify for inclusion into a plethora of entries occupying this graphic. The cataloged instances of these anomalies resolving numerical inconsistencies in the ‘Total Count’ (where the aggregate number of documented cases of 24,402 is exceeded by 2,397) and ‘Total Percentage’ (where 109.82% exceeds the 100% mathematical threshold) appendices.
ᴬ Percentage calculations pertaining to each individual entry obtained from the most recent Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) official estimate of 24,402 with lower cataloged rates of incidence rounded to the nearest one thousandth decimal approximation.
¹ The date ranges of 12/14/2020 to 2/18/2022 representing the most recent estimates relevant to the public release of vaccines by eleven of the fourteen principal manufacturers in the United States – CSL Limited, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies), MedImmune Vaccines, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Moderna Therapeutics, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Pfizer/ BioNTech, Protein Sciences Corporation, Sanofi Pasteur/ Translate Bio, and Seqirus, Inc., with the Dynavax Technologies Corporation, Oxford University/ AstraZeneca, and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. immunological derivatives having been excluded from the survey.
Vaccination: Injection of a killed or weakened infectious organism in order to prevent the disease.
Vaccine: A product that produces immunity therefore protecting the body from the disease. Vaccines are administered through needle injections, by mouth and by aerosol.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.
Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.
Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
NOTE: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, as well as the Centers for Disease Control of Prevention, are taxpayer funded, with 10,639 CDC employees having received a combined total of $1.1 billion USD in FY 2018 (Link). Doctors and physicians contracted with the agency earned $288,653 on average with the median compensation for staffing positions being $106,000.
In a document submitted to the prestigious Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Journal on December 27, 2020; J. Bart (John Barthelow) Classen outlined his concerns regarding the distribution of mRNA (Messenger Ribonucleic Acid) vaccines in a clinical setting, including the development of neurodegenerative disorders – primarily Alzheimer’s Disease, amyotropic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (also known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease), and transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs; i.e., prion diseases). Classen notes the propensity of mRNA-oriented (technological platforms, specifically those having been introduced by Moderna Therapeutics, involve the insertion of synthetic nucleoside-modified mRNA profiles into human cells) immunological derivatives to effectively alter naturally occurring RNA sequences in the human anatomy through the manifestation of proteopathic anomalies/ abnormalities (misfolded protein chain structures) that culminate with the genesis of a crystallized seeding mechanism at the biomolecular level designed to hasten spike protein synthesis – specifically with regard to the attachment of glycosylated type I transmembranous fusion polypeptides to the cellular surface. The binding of these structural composites also presenting the possibility of the aforementioned agents of influence facilitating an environment of susceptibility to more deleterious pathogens in the future through the aberrant production of site receptors. The incidence of Type I Diabetes precipitated by an overabundant release of insulin into the bloodstream also mentioned as a possible reaction to the addition of synthetically derived compounds from the mass inoculation campaign being conducted by the scientific community as a means of staving off the spread of infection from COVID-19 related illnesses.
¹ Characterized as the causation of debilitating illness, the onset of deleterious physiological complications, and/ or the manifestation of symptoms related to disease progression resulting from the application of diagnostic or therapeutic procedures by a practicing physician, oftentimes in a nosocomial (hospital or medical facility) setting.
DISCLAIMER: A 2010 federal study encompassing the time frame of 12/1/2007-9/30/2010 commissioned by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and conducted by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc. – a Harvard University Medical School consultation services affiliate – on behalf of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) determined that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events” are ever reported to VAERS (Link). These findings indicated in the ‘Results subsection’ of the document with the paragraph in question appearing below:
Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.
This data irregularity pertaining to documented instances of inimical reactions to clinically approved agents of inoculation conflicts with the actual number of unreported cases by a factor of 100. When put into perspective, using figures obtained through information accessed from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-funded VAERS Wonder System on May 7, 2021 as a statistical baseline, these numerical inconsistencies, paired in conjunction with documentation released in 2010 by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc., demonstrate that the acknowledged premature death total of 3,919 is, in actuality, more accurately represented as 391,900.
ADVERSE IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSES • INDEXED BY ADVERSE REACTION
¹ Also known as ‘doxing,’ with the term, ‘dox,’ recognized as the slang-based equivalent of the word ‘documents’ – commonly referred to as the unsolicited publication or disclosure of private contact information (geographical location, political persuasion, medical history, sexual orientation, religious affiliation, etc.), conducted by a third party to malign the reputation of, or influence public opinion, regarding the character of a targeted individual.
Citing the necessity of containing the spread of the COVID-19 infection during a cabinet meeting on Sunday, Netanyahu openly acknowledged the inherent purpose behind the measure’s passage in the following proclamation:
“The aim is to encourage them to get vaccinated and save lives.”
MEDICINAL TOTALITARIANISM¹
¹ The by-product of medicalization, a term synonymous with the expansion of the medical profession to include aspects of the human condition as a mechanism of social control. Devised by sociologists – Irving Kenneth Zola, Peter Conrad, and Thomas Stephen Szasz credited with its addition to modern sociological convention – to facilitate the application of aesculapian theory to patterns of behavior that, prior to their reclassification as pathological infirmities (encompassing observable phenomena related to psychiatric and physiological disciplines), existed independently of the biomedical perception of disability. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
1) Poverty – Extenuating circumstances, specifically environmental factors, become the basis for diagnosis
2) Impotence – Reproductive health as it pertains to the subject of fertility, utilized as means of addressing physiological dysfunction through pharmaceutical intervention
3) Racism – The issuance of prescriptions based on the genetic predisposition of ethnic minorities to certain illnesses as an instrument of racial profiling
4) Nutritional Deficiency – Primarily obesity, with nonpharmacological alternatives, such as modifications to one’s dietary regimen, abandoned in favor of surgical procedure. Since 2017, the calculation of BMI (Body Mass Index) as a method of determining the ratio of muscle, adipose, and bone tissue mass distribution in patients – specifically with regard to marginalized segments of the civilian population – has been deemed discriminatory by a number of online news publications associating its use in clinical settings with ‘fat shaming’ and ‘metabolic prejudice.’ These Neo-Marxian collectives emphasizing the necessity of its abolition in favor of a more culturally inclusive model (Link 1, Link 2, Link 3, Link 4, Link 5)
5) Developmental Disorders – Designed by its progenitors to target youth with the use of psychotropic derivatives in the treatment of neurochemical imbalances, specifically norepinephrine and serotonin, as 6,155,852 children and adolescents comprising the 0-17 age demographic are currently being prescribed one or more of these drugs in the United States according to the most recent survey conducted by Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) International. This pattern of authorization by mental health care professionals in the dissemination of “atypical antipsychotics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-type antidepressants” to prepubescent youth in America occurring at three times the rate of those residing in European destinations (Link)
Individuals, as well as travel agencies tasked with the responsibility of insuring their arrival into the European destination, deemed to be in violation of the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care’s edict risk monetary fines in excess of £10,000 ($13,909.90 USD) and up to 10 years in prison as indicated in the UK government health official’s most recent press release:
“Passenger carriers will have a duty and law to make sure the passengers have signed up for these new arrangements before they travel and will be fined if they don’t and we’ll be putting in tough fines for people who don’t comply. This includes a £1,000 penalty for any international arrival who fails to take a mandatory test, a £2,000 penalty for any international arrival who fails to take the second mandatory test, as well as automatically extending their quarantine period to 14 days, and a £5,000 fixed penalty notice – rising to £10,000 – for arrivals who fail to quarantine in a designated hotel. Anyone who lies on the passenger locator form and tries to conceal that they’ve been in a country on the red list in the 10 days before arrival here will face a prison sentence of up to 10 years.”
Appointed into office during the Obama Administration, Frieden released the following statement to the Wall St. Journal in February 2021:
“Going through the five phases of grief, we need to come to the acceptance phase that our lives are not going to be the same. I don’t think the world has really absorbed the fact that these are long-term changes.”
Frieden’s controversial declaration notwithstanding, the one-time government health official was apprehended by authorities in 2018 following allegations of sex abuse stemming from an incident that occurred at his Montague Street residence in Brooklyn Heights on October 20, 2017. The plaintiff in the criminal complaint, described by authorities as a 55-year-old feminist activist and close family acquaintance of 30 years, accused the former head of the CDC of “squeezing” her behind. Frieden, 57 years of age at the time of his arrest, was charged with two separate misdemeanor counts of third-degree sexual abuse and forcible touching, as well as harassment, an additional violation, for groping the unidentified woman’s anatomy.
Legislators seek to expand the authoritative scope of an order that was passed in November 2020 by the Oregon Health Authority requiring employers to adhere to the following:
Physical Distancing
1) Employers must ensure six-foot distancing between all people in the workplace through design of work activities and workflow, unless it can be shown it is not feasible for some activities.
Masks, Face Covering, or Face Shields
1) Employers must ensure that all individuals – including employees, part-time workers and customers – at the workplace, or other establishment under the employer’s control, wear a mask, face covering, or face shield in line with the Oregon Health Authority’s statewide guidance.
2) Employers must provide masks, face coverings, or face shields for employees free of cost.
3) If an employee chooses to wear a mask, face shield, or face covering – even when it is not required – the employer must allow them to do so.
4) When employees are transported in a vehicle for work-related purposes, regardless of the travel distance or duration, all people inside the vehicle must wear a mask, face covering, or face shield. This requirement does not apply when all people in the vehicle are members of the same household.
ABBREVIATIONAL INDEX
OSHA – Occupational Safety and Health Administration
The exorbitant entry fees administered on a daily basis in compliance with federal mandate designed to restrict the access of journalists attempting to attend acting U.S. Press Secretary Jennifer “Jen” Rene Psaki’s news briefings.
The survey, conducted by Martin Z. Bazant and John W. M. Bush for the Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) of the United States of America, dispelled the benefits of social distancing, specifically with regard to the so-called ‘6-foot rule,’ in preventing the aerosolized transmission (droplet spread from fluid release during the act of coughing or sneezing) of the COVID-19 contagion in an enclosed area. Key findings of the research-based analysis, which calculated exposure risk to the virus governed by the factors of time spent indoors and air filtration/ circulation of ventilation units, were detailed in the following assessment:
“The distancing isn’t helping you that much and it’s also giving you a false sense of security because you’re as safe at 6 feet as you are at 60 feet if you’re indoors.”
ABBREVIATIONAL INDEX
PNAS – Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences
The aforementioned medical data collections agency a subsidiary of Alclear, LLC, technological innovation and development company whose product lines have been certified as Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technologies by the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) S&T (Science and Technology) Directorate. These interagency consortiums acting in concert with ‘The Commons Project Foundation,’ a non-profit public trust whose Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Paul Meyer, received funding from the Rockefeller Foundation to facilitate the establishment of a digitally transcribed health services and information accessibility platform for Android mobile communications devices. Meyer is also an acknowledged contributor to the World Economic Forum (WEF), a transnational collective hailed by its progenitors as the premiere ‘International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation,’ whose principal founder, Klaus Schwab, has openly emphasized the necessity of instituting the ‘Great Reset’ (Link 1, Link 2, Link 3, Link 4, Link 5) to address economic, environmental, social and technological disparities plaguing humanity in the 21st Century.
The travel requirements being instituted at the behest of the nation’s scientific community, the vast majority of which cite the efficacy of the tests – which involve the extraction of rectal cultures through the use of elongated Q-tips (the genericized trademark equivalent for a cotton swab in the United States) – to render a significantly greater degree of accuracy in the detection of viral traces than airport security screening procedures employing the use of similar devices for the purpose of oral or nasal inspection. The recently implemented restrictions part of the East Asian nation state’s zero tolerance health policy with examination hubs positioned throughout various airport locations in the cities of Beijing (Beijing Daxing International Airport, Beijing Capital International Airport), Qingdao (Qingdao Jiaodong International Airport, Qingdao Liuting International Airport), and Shanghai (Pudong International Airport, Hongqiao International Airport).
Appearing on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” a nationally syndicated “pre-market” morning news and talk program, during a televised segment that aired on April 9th, 2020, the multibillionaire ‘philanthropist’ proffered the hypothetical scenario of concomitant exigencies occurring as a result of the vaccine’s introduction in statistically vulnerable societal demographics. Gates’s suppositional postulation a quantitative relation, or ratio, of 1:10,000 (1 in 10,000), reflecting an aggregate total of 700,000 affected individuals when paired in conjunction with the world’s population of 7 billion, a figure that at the time of his conjectural analysis was precisely 7,794,798,739. The avowed ‘technocrat’ would later emphasize the necessity of a global system of indemnification for pharmaceutical companies tasked with the manufacture of vaccine-based derivatives similar to that which was signed into law in the United States under the guidance of the Reagan Administration with the advent of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34)¹. The enactment of this provision, paired in conjunction with both the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA) of 2005, as well as the 2011 Supreme Court decision of the Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, 562 U.S. 223² (Link 1, Link 2) litigational proceeding, retroactively shielding the aforementioned agencies of influence from the prospect of financial liability precipitated by claims related to injuries sustained to patients receiving immunological care in a medical setting.
(a) GENERAL RULE Except as provided in subsections (b), (c), and (e) State law shall apply to a civil action brought for damages for a vaccine-related injury or death³
(b) UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS; WARNINGS
(1)
No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.
(B) by clear and convincing evidence that the manufacturer failed to exercise due care notwithstanding its compliance with such Act and section (and regulations issued under such provisions).
(C) DIRECT WARNINGS No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party (or the injured party’s legal representative) of the potential dangers resulting from the administration of the vaccine manufactured by the manufacturer.
² A legal proceeding remanded to the Supreme Court of the United States following the acknowledgment of a petition for a writ of certiorari by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. The case, as it appeared in the federal docket, incorporated the use of the following descriptor as a unique identifier:
Russell Bruesewitz and Robalee Bruesewitz, Parents and Natural Guardians of Hannah Bruesewitz, A Minor Child, And In Their Own Right v. Wyeth Inc. F/K/A Wyeth Laboratories, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Wyeth Lederle, Wyeth Lederle Vaccines, and Lederle Laboratories
The case’s central argument born of a lawsuit by the plaintiffs that was initially filed in the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (a judiciary appendage of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, an independent tribunal tasked with the assessment, and eventual verdict-based determination of monetary claims levied against the U.S. Federal Government. Notice the logo being utilized by this organization, particularly its incorporation of the Illuminist ‘All-Seeing Eye’ as its principal motif, a prominent fixture in Luciferian and Masonic nomenclature, as well as a host of other pagan disciplines and philosophies) against Wyeth Inc. (Wyeth, Inc., also referred to as Wyeth, LLC, acquired by Pfizer through a corporate merger on October 15, 2009, with Pfizer-BioNTech recognized as one of the leading manufacturers of the COVID-19 vaccine) a Madison, New Jersey-based pharmaceutical company, alleging that their daughter, Hannah Bruesewitz, suffered seizures and developmental disorders as a direct result of the clinical application of Wyeth’s Tri-Immunol DTP (the acronym ‘DTP,’ referencing diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, three infectious diseases common to prepubescent youth) vaccine. The full context of their claim, as documented in the proceeding’s transcripts, detailed below:
The plaintiffs, Russell and Robalee Bruesewitz (“the Bruesewitzes”) claim that, among other factors, poor design of the vaccine TRI-IMMUNOL (“DTP”) by vaccine manufacturer Wyeth, Inc. (“Wyeth”) caused an injury to their daughter, Hannah Bruesewitz (“Hannah”). Hannah was six months old when she received her third scheduled injection of DTP on April 1, 1992. Shortly after the injection, Hannah began experiencing seizures. The seizures persisted and the Bruesewitzes counted 126 seizures over a sixteen-day period. Eventually, these seizures left Hannah lethargic, developmentally stunted, and displaying autistic-like symptoms. In 2003, doctors diagnosed Hannah with a residual seizure disorder and encephalopathy. Because of these conditions, Hannah will likely require lifelong medical care. Despite the success of DTP in reducing pertussis (or “whooping cough”) infections, the Bruesewitzes contend that Wyeth and other medical professionals and organizations were aware of several adverse effects associated with the vaccine. In fact, Hannah’s injection was drawn from a vaccine lot that had over sixty-five complaints of adverse reactions filed with the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”). Of these, thirty-nine resulted in emergency room visits, six in hospitalizations, and two in death. In retrospect, Hannah’s physician insists that had she been aware of the incidents associated with this lot, she would not have administered the vaccine. The Bruesewitzes contend that Hannah’s injuries could have been avoided had Wyeth used an alternate design called ACEL-IMUNE (“DTaP”). However, though the FDA approved DTaP (the acronym ‘DTP,’ referencing diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, with the lowercase ‘a’ used to acknowledge the presence of antigens) in 1991, the approval extended to only the fourth and fifth injections following three scheduled injections of the DTP formula. It was not until 1996 that the FDA licensed DTaP for all five injections. Wyeth ceased distribution of DTP in 1998.
Their allegations of malfeasance on the part of Wyeth, Inc., who they asserted willfully administered the DTP vaccine to their young daughter despite their foreknowledge of documentation providing conclusive evidence of deleterious side effects in patients having received the aforementioned agent of inoculation in sixty-five separate instances, repudiated by the U.S. Supreme Court by a margin of 6-2 on February 22, 2011, on the basis that the “plaintiffs design defect claims [were] expressly preempted by the Vaccine Act.” The Court’s ruling reaffirming stipulations outlined within the contents of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 exempting pharmaceutical manufacturers from liability in the incidence of vaccine-induced injuries or death, provided that their immunological derivatives were “accompanied by proper directions and warnings” prior to their administration in a clinical setting. The judiciary also referencing the topic of ‘Products Liability,’ specifically a clause present in § 402A SPECIAL LIABILITY OF SELLER OF PRODUCT FOR PHYSICAL HARM TO USER OR CONSUMER, what is routinely labeled as ‘Comment K⁵’ in legal parlance, as further justification for its decision.
(5) The term “vaccine-related injury or death” means an illness, injury, condition, or death associated with one or more of the vaccines set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table, except that the term does not include an illness, injury, condition, or death associated with an adulterant or contaminant intentionally added to such a vaccine.
⁴ An abbreviation for the Latin phrase, “et sequentes” or “et sequential,” the English equivalent of which is recognized as, “and the following.” Used in a multitude of state and federal channels to reference specific pages, sections, or inventoried listings within statutes, articles, regulations, or other legally binding documents to indicate that the information being presented is elaborated on in greater detail in the form of written annotation appearing below the original entry.
⁵ A component of the § 402A Restatement of Torts, Second memoranda, specifically with regard to the application of tort reform in common law precedent, the context of which is divided into two distinct categories, with the first portion being particularly relevant in the resolution of claims referencing the negligence of pharmaceutical manufacturers and medicinal dispensaries in the administration of prescription drugs in a clinical or commercial setting. These sections, as they appear under the aforementioned heading, detailed accordingly:
Comment:
k. Unavoidably unsafe products. Unavoidably unsafe products. There are some products which, in the present state of human knowledge, are quite incapable of being made safe for their intended and ordinary use. These are especially common in the field of drugs. An outstanding example is the vaccine for the Pasteur treatment of rabies, which not uncommonly leads to very serious and damaging consequences when it is injected. Since the disease itself invariably leads to a dreadful death, both the marketing and the use of the vaccine are fully justified, notwithstanding the unavoidable high degree of risk which they involve. Such a product, properly prepared, and accompanied by proper directions and warning, is not defective, nor is it unreasonably dangerous. The same is true of many other drugs, vaccines, and the like, many of which for this very reason cannot legally be sold except to physicians, or under the prescription of a physician.
The stanzas referencing the inherent risks associated with the use of the Imovax® Rabies Vaccine marketed and promoted by Sanofi Pasteur as a viable treatment option in the mitigation of exposure to the rabies virus, primarily, ‘Since the disease itself invariably leads to a dreadful death, both the marketing and the use of the vaccine are fully justified, notwithstanding the unavoidable high degree of risk which they involve. Such a product, properly prepared, and accompanied by proper directions and warning, is not defective, nor is it unreasonably dangerous,’ used to absolve large-scale corporate firms and institutions of liability in legal proceedings emphasizing the presence of deficiencies in the design and structure of immunological agents that may have otherwise contributed to the death or debilitating injury of patients to whom such drugs were given.
ABBREVIATIONAL INDEX
CDC – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CNBC – Consumer News and Business Channel
DTP – Diphtheria Tetanus Pertussis
FDA – Food and Drug Administration
NCVIA – National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
PREPA – Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act
U.S.C. – United States Code
TYRANNY
MEDICINAL TOTALITARIANISM¹
¹ The by-product of medicalization, a term synonymous with the expansion of the medical profession to include aspects of the human condition as a mechanism of social control. Devised by sociologists – Irving Kenneth Zola, Peter Conrad, and Thomas Stephen Szasz credited with its addition to modern sociological convention – to facilitate the application of aesculapian theory to patterns of behavior that, prior to their reclassification as pathological infirmities (encompassing observable phenomena related to psychiatric and physiological disciplines), existed independently of the biomedical perception of disability. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
1) Poverty – Extenuating circumstances, specifically environmental factors, become the basis for diagnosis
2) Impotence – Reproductive health as it pertains to the subject of fertility, utilized as means of addressing physiological dysfunction through pharmaceutical intervention
3) Racism – The issuance of prescriptions based on the genetic predisposition of ethnic minorities to certain illnesses as an instrument of racial profiling
4) Nutritional Deficiency – Primarily obesity, with nonpharmacological alternatives, such as modifications to one’s dietary regimen, abandoned in favor of surgical procedure. Since 2017, the calculation of BMI (Body Mass Index) as a method of determining the ratio of muscle, adipose, and bone tissue mass distribution in patients – specifically with regard to marginalized segments of the civilian population – has been deemed discriminatory by a number of online news publications associating its use in clinical settings with ‘fat shaming’ and ‘metabolic prejudice.’ These Neo-Marxian collectives emphasizing the necessity of its abolition in favor of a more culturally inclusive model (Link 1, Link 2, Link 3, Link 4, Link 5)
5) Developmental Disorders – Designed by its progenitors to target youth with the use of psychotropic derivatives in the treatment of neurochemical imbalances, specifically norepinephrine and serotonin, as 6,155,852 children and adolescents comprising the 0-17 age demographic are currently being prescribed one or more of these drugs in the United States according to the most recent survey conducted by Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) International. This pattern of authorization by mental health care professionals in the dissemination of “atypical antipsychotics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-type antidepressants” to prepubescent youth in America occurring at three times the rate of those residing in European destinations (Link)
8,761 separate files obtained from the Central Intelligence Agency's Center for Cyber Intelligence in Langley, Virginia; comprising the 'Vault 7: Year Zero' series of leaked informational repositories provided conclusive evidence substantiating the existence of a CIA-coordinated "global covert hacking initiative," utilizing "weaponized exploits" designed to target a broad range of consumer products from some of the largest Internet-based technology firms and telecommunications companies
The CIA's application of Zero-Day, also known as Zero-Hour, 0-Day, or Day Zero; weaponized exploits (terminology referencing the existence of an undisclosed computer-software vulnerability oftentimes exploited by hackers that impairs the functionality of an existing mainframe's operational sequence, Internet-oriented applicative extensions, and/ or topological networking array. The use of the descriptor, "Zero-Day," indicative of the manufacturer's ignorance of the unspecified security breach, where the discovery of a particular system's inherent degree of susceptibility to intrusion remains hidden prior to the disclosure of its scope of infiltration to the general public) impacting "Apple's iPhone, Google's Android, Microsoft's Windows Operating Systems, and even Samsung-brand manufactured televisions, which are turned into covert microphones" - Wikileaks also asserts that government operatives are able to penetrate Android system compliant communications devices and collect "audio and message traffic before encryption can be applied"
One of the more notable disclosures that, if confirmed, "would rock the technology world," claims that the CIA had managed to bypass the existing encryption standards on several popular phone and messaging services including Signal, WhatsApp and Telegram
Yet another disconcerting revelation mentioned in the context of these documents asserts that the CIA possesses the capability of orchestrating "false flag" cyberattack offensives against a targeted nation state or region that effectively implicates said country as the authoring assembly of those assaults - referring to the CIA's Remote Device Branch's (RDB) UMBRAGE Directive, Wikileak's source notes that it "collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques 'stolen' from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation
"With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types, but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the 'fingerprints' of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from. UMBRAGE components cover keyloggers, password collection, webcam capture, data destruction, persistence, privilege escalation, stealth, anti-virus portable storage device (PSD) protection vectors, and survey techniques"
Key findings from the Vault 7 release:
"Year Zero" introduces the scope and direction of the CIA's global covert hacking program, its prodigious arsenal of malware and dozens of "Zero Day" weaponized exploits against a wide range of U.S. and European company products
The CIA actively targets iPhones and iOS-based appliances (iPad tablet computers, iPod touchscreen personal computers), Android communications system compliant devices and SMART (Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology) TVs
The CIA's Mobile Development Branch (MDB) is responsible for the cultivation of attack-oriented sequences targeting SMART phones and cellular communications devices with infected products relaying a specific user's geolocation, audio and text-generated correspondence histories, and allowing for the covert activation of a particular article's built-in camera or microphone accessories
CIA malware and hacking tools are built by the Engineering Development Group (EDG), a software evolution and technological innovation firm comprising the agency's Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI). The CCI Being Managed by the CIA's Directorate for Digital Innovation (DDI), One of Five Major Compartmentalized Divisions Within the Central Intelligence Agency
Central Intelligence Agency operations specialists are able to compromise an automotive vehicle's electronically-based control apparatus
The infiltration of Windows-based operating systems, Mac OS X (Unix-based Operating Systems developed and marketed by Apple Inc., tailored exclusively toward Macintosh computers), Linux, and various routing technologies has been made possible through the utilization of malware that is inclusive of multiple local and remote weaponized "Zero Day" exploits, air gap jumping viruses such as "Hammer Drill" to infect software applications distributed by way of CD/ DVDs, malicious code sequences targeting USB (Universal Serial Bus) storage devices and removable media, as well as vulnerability assessment programs designed to conceal information in images or partitioned areas of a particular machine's drive-based directory
Points of Reference and Terminology
Assassin - A cyberattack mechanism acting as an automated system of infestation and manipulative control of various malicious code sequences that are attributed to the CIA's AIB (Automated Implants Branch) Division
Bartender - A malicious code sequence tailored to Microsoft Windows operating systems revealed during the course of Wikileak's Vault 7: Year Zero release, the exact purpose of which remains unknown
Brutal Kangaroo (DTNtfsAds_BK) - A unilaterally distributed modulation allowing for the transport or storage of information by way of concealment in NTFS-specific (New Technology File System-specific) Data Streams. Each chunk (call to addFile) effectively authorizes the creation of a new stream with these packets of information being categorized in accordance with the ProgramID. This module overloads the constructor, which navigates a path to a NTFS-compliant file/ directory/ volume
Cutthroat - A malicious code sequence uncovered during the course of Wikileak's Vault 7: Year Zero investigational release, the exact purpose of which has yet to be revealed
DanceFloor - Currently undefined, Linux compliant
Hammer Drill - A CD/ DVD (Compact Disc/ Digital Versatile Disc) trojaned binary collection tool that effectively allocates directory walks and files to a preconfigured tree of information or filename pattern that also allows for the documentation of CD/ DVD insertion and removal events
HIVE - A multi-platform malware suite and its associated control software. The project provides customizable implants for Windows, Solaris, MikroTik (Founded in 1996, MikroTik is a Latvian company specializing in the development of routers and wireless Internet Service Provider systems) and Linux platforms, utilizes a Listening Post (LP)/ Command and Control (C2) infrastructure to establish an active channel of communication with said implants - Closely associated with the CIA's Embedded Development Branch (EDB) Services Division
Improvise (JQJIMPROVISE) - A toolset for configuration, post-processing, payload setup and execution vector selection for survey/ exfiltration implements supporting all major operating systems: Windows (Bartender), MacOS (JukeBox) and Linux (DanceFloor)
JukeBox - Currently undefined, MacIntosh Operating System (MacOS) compliant
Medusa - A cyberattack mechanism acting as an automated system of infestation and manipulative control of various malicious code sequences
Swindle - Currently undefined
UMBRAGE - A compartmentalized directive devised by the CIA's Remote Development Branch (RDB) tasked with the collection and maintenance of an itemized inventory of attack techniques acquired from malware produced in various nation states and foreign-based municipalities
Weeping Angel - A complex potpourri of software applications authored into existence by the CIA's Embedded Development Branch (EDB) allowing prospective users to employ the use of multiple agencies and vectors for the purpose of attacking, monitoring, and listening to a targeted machine, including SMART TVs
Weeping Angel allows for the following:
1) Extraction of browser-oriented credentials and composite viewing histories
2) Extraction of WPA Key/ WiFi (Wireless Fidelity Key Protected Access/ Wireless Fidelity) access codes and user authentication metrics
3) Insertion of Root CA (Certificate Authority) Certification to facilitate MitM (Man-in-the-Middle) attacks on browsing utilities (Firefox, Google Chrome, Internet Explorer, etc.), remote accessibility features, or Adobe-compliant applications or system processes
4) Investigation and vulnerability assessment of remote accessibility features
5) Investigation and vulnerability assessment of listening ports as well as their correspondent services
First set of electronically-generated communications released to the general public by WikiLeaks from the messaging archives of John David Podesta, the Acting Chairman of the 2016 Electoral Campaign for Democratic National Committee Presidential Nominee Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, former Chief of Staff to President William Jefferson Clinton, Chair of the Washington, DC-based think tank Center for American Progress, Supervisory Head of the Podesta Group Lobbying Firm, and Political Consultant for Current U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama; details the sale of the Uranium One Company to Russian Federation government-controlled interests bequeathing an estimated 1/5th of all domestic Uranium production capacity in the United States to Moscow Kremlin
Because of Uranium's status as a strategic asset, specifically with regard to the implications of its use in the manufacture of nuclear weapons, the agreement had to be formally ratified by a committee of representatives from a number of U.S. government agencies and institutions with the following having been identified as participants: the U.S. State Department, which was headed by then Secretary of State Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton; and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) which is comprised of the Secretaries of the Treasury, National Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce, and Energy
Communications dated on March 13th of 2016 between John David Podesta, the acting Chairman of the 2016 Electoral Campaign for Democratic National Committee Presidential Nominee Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, and Bill Ivey, former Chairman of the National Endowment of the Arts during William Jefferson Clinton's Presidential tenure, found to contain the following:
"And as I've mentioned, we've all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. This problem demands some serious, serious thinking — and not just poll driven, demographically-inspired messaging"
WikiLeaks, together with Glenn Greenwald and Lee Fang of the Intercept, demonstrate that "a central component of the Clinton campaign strategy is ensuring that journalists they believe are favorable to Clinton be tasked to report the stories the campaign wants circulated"
Itemized list compiled by Jennifer Palmieri, the Campaign Communications Director for the one-time U.S. Secretary of State, highlights ostensible political pundits and journalists potentially amenable to the promotion of Clinton policy with the following individuals having been targeted exclusively:
Political Consultants
Dan Balz Wolf Blitzer Gloria Borger Mika Brzezinski David Brooks Gail Collins John Dickerson EJ Dionne Maureen Dowd Ronan Farrow Howard Fineman Ron Fournier Mark Halperin Chris Hayes John Heilemann Jon Karl John King Mara Liasson Rachel Maddow Ruth Marcus Chris Matthews Dana Milbank Andrea Mitchell Norah O'Donnell Robin Roberts Eugene Robinson Charlie Rose April Ryan George Stephanopoulos Robin Sproul Karen Tumulty Jeff Zeleny
Nationally Syndicated Multimedia Agency News Reporters and Columnists
ABC (American Broadcasting Company)
Jon Karl David Muir Diane Sawyer Cecilia Vega
CBS (Columbia Broadcasting System)
Vicki Gordon
CNN (Cable News Network)
John Berman Kate Bouldan David Chalian Sam Feist Brianna Keilar Mark Preston
The Daily Beast
Jackie Kucinich
GPG (Glover Park Group)
Mike Feldman
Huffington Post
Whitney Snyder
Meredith Corporation's More Magazine
Betsy Fischer Martin
MSNBC (MicroSoft/ National Broadcasting Company)
Beth Fouhy Phil Griffin Rachel Racusen Alex Wagner
NBC (National Broadcasting Company)
Savannah Guthrie
New Yorker
Ryan Liza
NYT (New York Times)
Amy Chozik Maggie Haberman Pat Healey Johnathan Martin
Tanden proffers the suggestion that such documents should have been made public 18 months prior to Clinton's Presidential Campaign to avoid undue speculation by various branches of intelligence community
The CAP President then goes forward with the assertion that the reasons behind the 2016 DNC Presidential Nominee's, as well as that of her legal counsel's recalcitrance, rested in their confidence that they were somehow immune to such scrutiny, having been credited with the following statement:
Sampling bias in the most recent ABC/ Washington Post survey was blatantly obvious in the delegation of registration advantages to certain segments of the population deemed to possess a favorable view of DNC Presidential Nominee Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton via over indexation
Noted utterance referencing the eventual purge of electronically-generated communications illustrated in the following:
"On another matter... and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have to dump all those emails"
Proposed "dumping" on March 2 of 2015 occurred two days prior to the House Select Committee on Benghazi's manufacture of a document retention subpoena that was to take effect on March 4
Marina Abramović, characterized as a performance artist by the corporate telecommunications industry, regularly entertains members of the political establishment, entertainment, and high society during the course of “spirit cooking” rituals where emphasis is placed on the symbolic nature of the union between the Microcosm: Man; and the Macrocosm: the Divine; in harmony with one of the principal axioms of Hermetic Doctrine: “As Above, So Below”
The redirected funds include $850 billion that was originally allocated by United States Congressional Representatives for the purpose of replenishing the nation’s Strategic National Stockpile (SNS), an emergency medicinal repository of antibiotics, vaccines, antitoxins, et al. that was significantly impacted by the scientific community’s COVID-19 response. An additional $850 billion also siphoned from a program intended to provide assistance in the implementation and expansion of coronavirus testing by healthcare professionals. The acting administration’s revision to the existing policies of immigration reform totaling in excess of $8 billion at the close of the current fiscal year.
Outlined within the written contents of their proposal is the elimination of detentions for undocumented foreign nationals apprehended by authorities for illegal entry, the immediate cessation of border wall construction – including barriers of deterrence and steel fencing – and substantial decreases in the deportation of unaccompanied minors, as well as their families.
The addition of an estimated 52,000,000 unregistered aliens into the U.S. exacerbating concerns of a politically motivated demographic shift with the burgeoning influx of Third World designated populations accounting for 16 to 29 million of the nation’s census in 2018 alone (a figure routinely dismissed as the by-product of right-wing xenophobic conjecture by the corporate telecommunications industry with their constituents insisting that the actual number of migrants claiming residency is between 11 and 13 million).
A statement released by a FAIR representative details the outcome of the measure’s ratification in the following stanza:
“This dramatic increase would eclipse the entire current foreign-born population of the country.”
FAIR’s analysis also detailing heightened cost expenditures relevant to the U.S. National Budget in the furnishing of basic amenities (housing, clothing apparel, food and water, etc.) and access to welfare/ income assistance programs and entitlements. These concessions elevating the preexisting financial service obligations by American taxpayers through the disbursement of federally-subsidized monetary funding to an annual figure of $200 billion.
Records pertaining to the current fiscal year illustrate an influx of 434,000 migrants by way of the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) catch and release policy¹, a forecast based on prevailing numerical estimates documenting the calculated dispersal of more than 36,000 foreign nationals into the territorial periphery of America each month since the beginning of the 2019 calendar year
Additionally, Princeton University policy advisors researcher Stephen Kopits asserts that up to 500,000 illegal aliens will enter the continental United States through its southern border before end of FY 2019 (fiscal year 2019)
Lastly, accounting for the relative consistency of H1-B Worker’s Visa, as well as tourist/ traveler’s visa violations by way of an individual’s refusal to leave since FY 2017, another 630,000 unregistered non-citizens could potentially be added to the burgeoning immigrant population
¹ The coordinated strategy of releasing undocumented migrants into the outlying community in advance of court proceedings designed to determine immigration status as opposed to fostering their detention in holding facilities. Contrary to assertions posited by acting U.S. President Donald J. Trump placing the onus of the protocol’s inception on political representatives aligned with the DNC (Democratic National Committee), preexisting statutes governing catch and release policy were effectively rewritten by virtue of Supreme Court mandate in the case of Zadvydas v. Davis (Kestutis Zadvydas versus Christine G. Davis and Immigration and Naturalization Service, John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al.). The judiciary ruled that the premise of plenary power (also referred to as plenary authority, indicative of an unrivaled scope of regency granted to a particular entity or individual whereby the caveat of limitation or peer review is nullified) doctrine cannot be applied to the indefinite detainment of immigrants under order of deportation that no other country will readily accept into their population. Further, the U.S. Federal Government was required to demonstrate a coordinated plan of extraction for foreign nationals placed in border patrol/ security processing and evaluation centers for periods exceeding six months as justification for their prolonged captivity that would otherwise be in violation of an individual’s basic civil liberties/ fundamental human rights as specified under the parameters of the UN’s (United Nations) 1951 Refugee Convention (Also referred to as the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees)
44% of those graduates residing in two states: California and Texas, each of which account for 27,000 and 17,000 of the prior stated total of 98,000 respectively
According to various National Public Radio (NPR) -based affiliates the median cost expenditure/ tax burden associated with the eventual enrollment and attendance of prospective students in the U.S. public school system is $10,615¹
When factoring in the annual figures pertaining to undocumented migrant attendees (98,000 x $10,615), the annually-indexed fiscal obligation foisted on American taxpayers to fund the educational exploits of unregistered foreign nationals becomes a staggering total of $1,040,270,000 (Billion)
¹ The $10,615 annual numeric based on several studies comprising the 2012 fiscal year (FY 2012)
In verbatim, the following stipulations as they appear in the document affirm this contention:
Title II, Section 224. (a)
None of the funds provided by this Act or any other Act, or provided from any accounts in the Treasury of the United States derived by the collection of fees available to the components funded by this Act, may be used by the Secretary of Homeland Security to place in detention, remove, refer for a decision whether to initiate removal proceedings, or initiate removal proceedings against a sponsor, potential sponsor, or member of a household of a sponsor or potential sponsor of an unaccompanied alien child (as defined in section 462(g) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(g))) based on information shared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Title II, Section 230. (a)
Of the total amount made available under “U.S. Customs and Border Protection-Procurement, Construction, and Improvements,” $2,370,222,000 shall be available only as follows:
(1) $1,375,000,000 is for the construction of primary pedestrian fencing, including levee pedestrian fencing in the Rio Grande Valley Sector;
Title II, Section 230. (b)
The amounts designated in subsection (a)(1) shall only be available for operationally effective designs as of the date of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 (Public Law 115-31), such as currently deployed steel bollard designs, that prioritize agent safety.
Title II, Section 231
None of the funds made available by this Act or prior Acts are available for the construction of pedestrian fencing –
(1) within the Santa Ana Wildlife Refuge; (2) within the Bentsen-Rio Grande Valley State Park; (3) within La Lomita Historical Park; (4) within the National Butterfly Center; or (5) within or east of the Vista del Mar Ranch tract of the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge.
Title II, Section 232. (a)
Prior to the use of any funds made available by this Act for the construction of physical barriers within the city limits of any city or census designated place described in subsection (c), the Department of Homeland Security and the local elected officials of such a city or census designated place shall confer and seek to reach mutual agreement regarding the design and alignment of physical barriers within that city or census designated place (as the case may be). Such consultations shall continue until September 30, 2019 (or until agreement is reached, if earlier) and may be extended beyond that date by agreement of the parties, and no funds made available in this Act shall be used for such construction while consultations are continuing.
Title II, Section 232. (c)
The cities and census designated places described in this subsection are as follows:
(1) Roma, Texas (2) Rio Grande City, Texas (3) Escobares, Texas (4) La Grulla, Texas (5) The census designated place of Salineno, Texas
Funding designed to provide assistance to ‘those suffering as a result of war, oppression, natural disaster and disease’
The money provided to displaced foreign nationals attempting to enter the continental United States acquired through the contributions of church parishioners (coffers present within the confines of Catholic institutions and agencies commonly referred to as Peter’s Pence¹)
In accordance with this revelation regarding the disbursement of these funds, the Peter’s Pence website released the following series of statements:
“In recent months, thousands of migrants have arrived in Mexico, having travelled more than 4,000 kilometres on foot and with makeshift vehicles from Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala. Men and women, often with young children, flee poverty and violence, hoping for a better future in the United States. However, the US border remains closed to them.”
“In 2018, six migrant caravans entered Mexico, for a total of 75,000 people; the arrival of other groups was announced. All these people were stranded, unable to enter the United States, without a home or livelihood. The Catholic Church hosts thousands of them in the hotels within dioceses or religious congregations, providing basic necessities, from housing to clothing.”
“Media coverage of this emergency has been decreasing and as a result, aid to migrants by the government and private individuals has also decreased.”
“In this context, Pope Francis donated $500,000 USD (United States Dollars) to assist migrants in Mexico. This amount will be distributed among 27 projects in 16 dioceses and among Mexican religious congregations that have asked for help in order to continue providing housing, food and basic necessities to these our brothers and sisters.”
“Of these projects, 13 have already been approved for the dioceses of Cuautitlán, Nogales (2), Mazatlán, Querétaro, San Andrés Tuxtla, Nuevo Laredo (2) and Tijuana; as well as for the Scalabrinians, the congregation of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary and the Josefinas Sisters. Another 14 projects are being evaluated. A regulated and transparent use of the resources, which must be accounted for, is required before the aid is assigned.”
“Thanks to these projects, and thanks to Christian charity and solidarity, the Mexican Bishops hope to be able to continue helping our migrant brothers and sisters.”
¹ Peter’s Pence (also identified as Denarii Sancti Petri or “Alms of St Peter”) are donations or payments made directly to the Holy See (Vatican) of the Catholic Church. The practice was formally instituted under Saxon political regimes in England and quickly spread throughout the European empire. Both before and after the Norman conquest the custom varied by time and place; initially, it was done as a pious contribution, whereas later it was required by various rulers, and collected in the form of a tax. Though formally discontinued in England at the time of the Reformation, a post-Reformation payment of undefined attribution proceeded unabated in a number of English manors well into the 19th century. In 1871, Pope Pius IX formalized the tradition of lay members of the church and “other persons of good will” providing financial support to the Roman See. Modern “Peter’s Pence” proceeds are used by the Pope for philanthropic endeavors throughout the world. The collection of Peter’s Pence taken annually on the Sunday closest to June 29th, a date that corresponds with the Solemnity of the Feast of Saints Peter and Paul in the liturgical calendar. Since 2012, the United States has donated the largest amounts, accounting for nearly 28% of the total with donations of $75.8 million in 2008, $82.5 million in 2009, $67.7 million in 2010, and $69.7 million in 2011.
Huber Morales, 24, a Mexican foreign national who entered the United States illegally, facing a five felony count indictment related to the rape and molestation of an unidentified seven-year-old girl in Indiana
The suspect, when questioned by Indiana State law enforcement officials, formally submitted a verbal confession having admitted to touching the prepubescent youth inappropriately three times and having unprotected sex with her on two separate occasions
Authorities began investigating the incident following the girl’s admittance to a medical facility where she was then treated for exposure to genital herpes
In an attempt to justify his course of action, Morales proffered claims of having had ‘strong black magic’ used against him
Enacted into law on October of 2015, the New Motor Voter Act is a statute requiring the Department of Motor Vehicles to forward records for all eligible applicants for driver’s licenses to the acting Secretary of State’s office for registration solely on the basis of a prospective individual’s claim of lawful permanent residency
According to representatives from the NTK (Need To Know) Network, Becerra was quoted with the following statements:
“There are new laws in place in California now in 2018. I mentioned two of them specifically, AB 450 (Assembly Bill 450) and SB 54 (Senate Bill 54). AB 450 deals with the workplace in particular and how we go about treating the information about the workplace and employees at the workplace by employers. What we’re trying to make sure is that employers are aware that in 2018, there is a new law in place.”
“We will prosecute those who violate [California] law.”
The written publication, entitled, “Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?,” was formally released by the United Nations Secretariat under the auspices of the globally directed agency’s Population Division and Department of Economic and Social Affairs in 2001. Embedded within the contents of the 157-page archive is a comprehensive outline comprised of six potential outcome scenarios for each of the ten preselected regions of the industrial world, with the following areas of influence examined in detail: (NOTE: Itemized nation/ region-specific inventories are listed in order of their appearance, in accordance with the contents of the aforementioned exposition)
1) France 2) Germany 3) Italy 4) Japan 5) Republic of Korea 6) Russian Federation 7) United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 8) United States of America 9) Europe 10) European Union
The foundational premise of the report contends that mass migration to each of the specified territories is essential to maintain the fiscal solvency of government subsidized (a term synonymous with ‘taxpayer funded;’ the use of this terminology recognized as a misnomer designed to obfuscate the intentions of a predatory elite class actively invested in the formulation of a system of wealth redistribution through the coordinated expansion of confiscatory policy – i.e. taxation – that facilitates the expropriation of an individual’s earned income to benefit “marginalized” populational segments for the express purpose of manipulating the outcome of future electoral cycles by pandering to a specific societal demographic, thereby guaranteeing their constituents within the political establishment a limitless degree of jurisdictional authority) economic subsistence, social, and politically motivated programs (examples of which include, but are not limited to: affordable housing, academic vouchers, nutritional assistance/ welfare, medicare, et al.). In compliance with the UN directive, the United States would be required to absorb between 6.4 million (the survey’s most conservative estimate, outlined in the contents of Scenario III) and 593 million (detailed in Scenario VI) migrants by 2050 as a means of ensuring a potential support ratio (PSR) eclipsing the statistical threshold of 5.0. The full context of each of the scenarios documented in the paragraphs below:
(b) Scenario I
Scenario I, the medium variant of the United Nations 1998 Revision, assumes an annual net intake of 760,000 migrants per year between 1995-2050, for a total of 41,800,000 net migrants during the period. Accordingly, the total population of the United States is projected to increase continuously from 267 million in 1995 to 349 million in 2050 (the results of the 1998 United Nations projections are shown in the annex tables). By 2050, out of this total population of 349 million, 59 million, or 16.8 percent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants. The population aged 15-64 would increase slowly from 174 million in 1995 to 214 million in 2050, although not in a monotonic fashion. The population aged 65 or older would rise rapidly, from 33 million in 1995 to nearly 76 million in 2050. As a result, the potential support ratio would decrease from 5.2 in 1995 to 2.8 in 2050.
(c) Scenario II
Scenario II, which is the medium variant with zero migration, uses the fertility and mortality assumptions of the medium variant of the 1998 Revision, but without any migration to the United States after 1995. The results in this scenario are quite different from those of scenario I. The total population would increase to 290 million in 2050, which is 50 million less than in scenario I. The population aged 15-64 would rise from 174 million in 1995 to 192 million in 2010 and 2015 and then decline, returning to 174 million in 2050. The population aged 65 or older would double, from 33 million in 1950 to 68 million in 2050. As a result, the potential support ratio would decline to 2.6 in 2050, which is slightly below that presented in Scenario I.
Scenario II, in contrast to the mathematical projections that have been portrayed in other linear-based outcomes presented in this dissertation, is predicated on the assumption that the migration of ‘Third World’ designated populations plaguing portions of the continental United States following the passage of theImmigration and Nationality Act of 1965¹ – oftentimes referred to as the Hart-Celler Initiative – would cease after 1995.
(d) Scenario III
Scenario III keeps the size of the total United States population constant at its maximum of 298 million, which it would reach in 2030 (assuming no in-migration after 1995). In order to keep the total population constant at that level, it would be necessary to have 6.4 million migrants between 2030 and 2050, which is an average of 319,000 migrants per year. By 2050, out of a total population of 298 million, 7.3 million, or 2.5 percent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants.
(e) Scenario IV
Scenario IV keeps the size of the population aged 15 to 64 constant at its maximum of 192.5 million, which it would reach in 2015 (assuming no in-migration after 1995). In order to keep the working-age population constant at that level, 18.0 million migrants would be needed between 2015 and 2050, which is an average of 513 thousand migrants per year. By 2050, out of a total population of 316 million, 25.0 million, or 7.9 percent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants.
(f) Scenario V
Scenario V does not allow the potential support ratio to decrease below the value of 3.0. In order to achieve this, no immigrants would be needed until 2025, and 44.9 million immigrants would be needed between 2025 and 2035, an average of 4.5 million per year during that period. By 2050, out of a total population of 352 million, 61 million, or 17 percent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants.
(g) Scenario VI
Scenario VI keeps the potential support ratio at its 1995 value of 5.2 persons aged 15-64 for each person aged 65 or older. In order to keep the potential support ratio constant at that level, it would be necessary to have 593 million immigrants from 1995 to 2050, an average of 10.8 million per year. By 2050, out of a United States total population of 1.1 billion, 775 million, or 73 percent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants.
¹ A comprehensive immigration and naturalization reform policy hailed by its progenitors as a necessary plan of contingency in the redress of grievance by habitually marginalized segments of the civilian population during the apex of the Civil Rights Movement. The stipulative decree, also known as the Hart-Celler Initiative (its name derived from Michigan State Senator Philip Aloysius Hart and New York State Congressional Representative Emanuel Celler, the principal sponsors of the bill), was formulated in response to the National Origins Formula and the Emergency Quota Act of 1921, two key components of the Immigration Act of 1924, legislative policy decried by organizers of the African American coordinated 1960’s era campaign for civil liberty as mechanisms of institutional bias and discrimination that disproportionately impacted persons of color. The bipartisan provision, which garnered support from members of the Republican National Committee and their counterparts within the Democrat Party, codified into law on October 3, 1965 by Lyndon Baines Johnson despite concerns that the measure’s addition to the Federal Register would adversely impact the prevailing socioeconomic demographic through a system of chain migration. Proponents of the decree, in a shameless attempt to persuade those opposed to its ratification, cited the merits and legitimacy of the directive as a function of moral necessity and a reexamination of America’s identitarianist legacy, a fact evidenced in statements by two of the measure’s most celebrated advocates:
“This old system violates the basic principle of American democracy, the principle that values and rewards each man on the basis of his merit as a man. It has been un-American in the highest sense, because it has been untrue to the faith that brought thousands to these shores even before we were a country. This is not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions.”
~ Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) (August 27, 1908 – January 22, 1973) 36th President of the United States (November 22, 1963 – January 20, 1969) Democratic National Committee Party Affiliation October 3, 1965 | Closing Remarks at the Signing of the Immigration Bill • Liberty Island, New York
“This bill will not flood our cities with a million immigrants annually. The ethnic mix of this country will not be upset by this bill. This bill will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country area. This bill will not cause Americans to lose their jobs.”
~ Edward “Ted” Moore Kennedy (February 22, 1932 – August 25, 2009) Massachusetts State United States Senator (November 7, 1962 – August 25, 2009) Democratic National Committee Party Affiliation 1965
The edict also facilitating the dilution of the electorate through the integration of undocumented foreign nationals into the voting process, with California extending voter registration benefits to illegal aliens in compliance with the state’s New Motor Voter Act.
The findings obtained by analysts maintained their consistency during the course of 1,000,000 simulations of the model with one of the projections present in the array placing undocumented immigrant populations in the United States as high as 37.2 million
The document in question, the results of which were published in PLOS (Public Library Of Science) One, encompassing the fiscal years of 1990 to 2016
Senate Bill 54, also known as the California Values Act and oftentimes referred to as the “Sanctuary State” Proposal, introduced on December 5th of 2016 by Democratic National Committee-Affiliated (DNC) Senate President Pro Tempore Kevin de León, to actively prohibit state government and local law enforcement agencies, including school resource officers and security detail, from investigating, interrogating, conducting surveillance, or otherwise detaining or arresting individuals deemed to be acting in violation of the Trump Administration’s immigration enforcement policies
Per the State of California’s Legislative Information Directory:
SENATE BILL NO. 54 SECTION 1. CHAPTER 17.25. Cooperation with Immigration Authorities
7284.2 The Legislature finds and declares the following:
(a) Immigrants are valuable and essential members of the California community. Almost one in three Californians is foreign born and one in two children in California has at least one immigrant parent.
(b) A relationship of trust between California’s immigrant community and state and local agencies is central to the public safety of the people of California.
(c) This trust is threatened when state and local agencies are entangled with Federal immigration enforcement, with the result that immigrant community members fear approaching police when they are victims of, and witnesses to, crimes, seeking basic health services, or attending school, to the detriment of public safety and the well-being of all Californians.
(d) Entangling state and local agencies with Federal immigration enforcement programs diverts already limited resources and blurs the lines of accountability between local, state, and Federal governments.
(e) State and local participation in Federal immigration enforcement programs also raises constitutional concerns, including the prospect that California residents could be detained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, targeted on the basis of race or ethnicity in violation of the Equal Protection Clause, or denied access to education based on immigration status.
(f) This chapter seeks to ensure effective policing, to the protect the safety, well-being, and constitutional rights of the people of California, and to direct the state’s limited resources to matters of greatest concern to state and local governments.
7284.6 (a) California law enforcement agencies shall not:
(1) Use agency or department moneys, facilities, property, equipment, or personnel to investigate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, including, but not limited to, any of the following:
(A) Inquiring into an individual’s immigration status.
(B) Detaining an individual on the basis of a hold request.
(C) Responding to requests for notification by providing release dates or other information unless that information is available to the public.
(D) Providing information regarding a person’s release date unless that information is available to the public.
(E) Providing personal information about an individual, including, but not limited to, the individual’s home address or work address unless that information is available to the public.
(F) Making, assisting, or participating in arrests based on civil immigration warrants.
(G) Giving federal immigration authorities access to interview an individual in agency or department custody, except pursuant to a judicial warrant, and in accordance with Section 7283.1
(H) Assisting federal immigration authorities in the activities described in Section 1357(a)(3) of Title 8 of the United States Code.
Per the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California:
SB 54 ensures that no state or local resources are diverted to fuel any attempt by the Federal Government to carry out mass deportations and that our schools, our hospitals, and our courthouses are safe spaces for everyone in our community.
Newly published documents circulated by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) affirm suspicions of a concerted effort by political constituencies within the Obama Administration to impede the deportation process of illegal immigrants entering the continental United States through various portions of the American Southwest
Statistics made public by the CIS regarding an annually released report by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) indicate the removal of 65,532 undocumented immigrants from America’s interior in FY2016 (roughly 0.5 percent of the estimated 12 million believed to have infiltrated the country during the course of Obama’s eight-year presidential tenure), a staggering 73 percent drop in deportations since 2009, when approximately 240,000 foreign nationals were removed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials
CIS also noted that the number of criminally convicted unregistered aliens routinely deported by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Agency experienced a marked declination of 60 percent over the last eight years
The immigration official appearing in the video, citing the aforementioned stipulation as an article of permissibility, also admits to granting Syrian refugees entry into the United States whose passport identification is proven to be fraudulent
ABBREVIATIONAL INDEX
AFDI – American Freedom Defense Initiative
USCIS – United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Prior to the incident in question, one of the suspects pictured in the video, Emillem ‘Lemon’ Khodagholi, was on probation for a variety of crimes (theft, assault, narcotics trafficking, terroristic threats)
Maisam Asfar, another suspect whose identity has since been revealed, was also well known to authorities
The victim, a young woman residing in the city of Uppsala, was abducted at gunpoint by the three men, all of whom took turns raping her for a period of three hours
During the course of the video, Khodagholi can be heard mocking the victim, who was barely conscious following the ordeal, with statements to the effect: “You got raped. There, we have the answers. You’ve been raped” – utterances he made that were soon accompanied by a raucous cacophony of laughter from the trio
The incident in question believed to have taken place in Hallonbergen, a suburb in Northern Stockholm where more than 67% of the population is foreign born, with a vast majority having arrived from Lebanon, Syria, and Eritrea
The victims of the brutal crime, with reports of the woman’s carotid artery having been severed along both sides of her neck and other news outlets indicating her decapitation, were parents to young children that had been targeted by the suspects to prevent their testimony as eyewitnesses to a previous crime
The police chief is rumored to have requested the services of reinforcements after five murders in recent days
Jennifer Delgado, the victim in the criminal complaint, was romantically involved with the suspect, having given birth to a son one year prior to the incident in question
Ramires, who has been charged with two counts of capital murder in San Antonio, purportedly shot the expectant mother, who at the time of her death was nine months pregnant with their second child, before attempting to take his own life
Horst Wenzel, 27, under the guise of cultural integration, actively conducting class-based instruction focused on interrelational nuances designed to mitigate the incidence of sexual assault on women in lieu of events pertaining to the New Year’s Eve attacks in the city of Cologne
The seminars, which typically command the equivalent of $1,500 USD (U.S. Dollars) per day for German citizens, are being offered free of charge to migrants who have entered the country
California, widely acknowledged as America’s most populous state with 39,250,017 residents occupying its territorial boundary, possesses the greatest imbalance with 44.6% of its inhabitants, all of those surveyed being five years of age and older, speaking a language other than English
The states of Texas at 35.6%, New Mexico at 34.5%, New Jersey at 31.7%, and New York at 31.0% occupying positions in the top five of this dubious distinction
The aforementioned statistical measure representing a two-fold increase since 1990 when immigrant households accounted for 11% of the nation’s cultural demographic
Right-wing conservative political elements asserting the claim that the mass exodus of immigrant populations into the European continent is being orchestrated by design and is part of a broader strategy by Ankara’s political regime to establish a modern-day Ottoman Empire, with Recep Tayyip Erdoğan being anointed as its Sultan
Controversial statements made by the Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs were in response to the electoral process in the Netherlands that pitted Nationalist Geert Wilders, an avowed critic of Islamic Fundamentalism, against the incumbent Prime Minister Mark Rutte
The dramatic war of words that initially began with many of Ankara’s elected officials accusing the Dutch Government of embracing fascist ideology and identifying the nation as a ‘Nazi remnant,’ intensifying to include other Western European nations – most notably Austria, Germany, Denmark, and Switzerland – that have restricted Turkish political rallies being conducted on their soil
Key findings from the report, entitled, “The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers,” which was released by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), are listed as follows:
The staggering cost expenditure relative to illegal immigrants and their accompanying undocumented children far outweigh the taxes paid to federal and state governments by a ratio of 7 to 1, with costs totaling $134,863,455,364 compared to tax revenues of $18,968,857,700 yielding a deficit of $115,894,597,664
The nearly $135 billion paid into the system by taxpayers at the state and local level being utilized to cover the cost of the presence of 12.5 million illegals, as well as their 4.2 million children who acquired citizenship by way of birth in the United States, amounting to approximately $8,075 per person prior to the administration of tax-based regulations, or $6,940 each after taxes have been taken into account
On the federal level, costs associated with medical services and health care necessities occupied $17.14 billion, law enforcement and regulation representing nearly $13.15 billion, and general government services being $8.8 billion
At the state and local level, education at $44.4 billion represented the most significant expense, followed by general public services and welfare at $18.5 billion, and medical related obligations at $12.1 billion
Of the 50 states, the top three based on cumulative cost to taxpayers for the housing and welfare of illegal immigrants and their children are California with a $23 billion financial burden, followed by Texas at $10.9 billion, and New York at $7.5 billion
Figures presented to the House of Lords in response to a question put forth by Lord Green of Deddington, Chairman of Migration Watch, who posited the necessity of constructing a new dwelling every five minutes to accommodate the needs of immigrant families entering the country
The construction of an additional 5.3 million new properties, with 2.4 million of that number slated for migrants, deemed necessary by the Department for Communities in the wake of the nation’s unchecked population growth
Legislative spending proposal allocating hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds and subsidies for purposes of “religious support,” including the purchase of Muslim Korans, prayer mats, and foot-washing and sanitizing utensils
Drafted provisions also emphasize the manufacture of mosques or “worship centres” at the expense of the Canadian citizenry
Recently enacted legislation prohibits the issuance of a court sanctioned Notice to Appear (NTA) and forbids customs enforcement agency representatives from disclosing the locations of individuals that have been released in compliance with the U.S. Federal Government’s mandate
According to extensive statistical analyses provided by the Center of Immigration Studies, these individuals possessed a combined total of 64,197 convictions between them, the median equivalency of 3.25 per person, with an estimated 8,234 of the arrests having been attributed to the incidence of violent crime
The directive effectively granting an estimated 8,000 Syrian migrants amnesty from the threat of deportation and extending their length of stay by 18 months in spite of their legal status
These so-called “sensitive locations,” identified as schools (licensed daycare facilities, preschools and elementary learning programs, primary and secondary schools, post-secondary academic venues including colleges and universities), medical treatment and health care facilities (hospitals, doctor’s offices, accredited health clinics, emergent and urgent care facilities), places of worship (churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples), religious or civil ceremonies (funeral processions, matrimonial gatherings), and public demonstrations (organized rallies or parades), in compliance with government mandate, have been made exempt from standard immigration enforcement policy (arrests, open interrogations, searches, and surveillance)
The aforementioned agency’s online services directory also providing a toll-free telephone listing and email correspondence option for illegal aliens to report immigration enforcement efforts taking place at any one of the “sensitive locations” mentioned in the context of the initiative
Of that number, 13,100 (99.1 Percent) found to be Muslim, with 12,966 being Sunni, 24 Shi’a, and 110 of that number identified as ‘other’
Estimates representative of a disparate contrast in the amount of Christians, with 77 (0.5 percent) having been given asylum from war-torn parts of Syria, as well as Yazidis, with 24 (0.18 percent) been admitted during the first half of 2016
Attendees of the event were purportedly whipped and beaten with belts following a verbal altercation involving several unidentified asylum seekers, many of whom are thought to have arrived in the country from Afghanistan, who refused to extinguish a fire on the grounds of the gathering
Recently submitted report by Germany’s Federal Criminal Police Office details the documentation of 142,500 criminal offenses committed by migrants entering the country during the first six months of 2016, a figure whose numerical equivalent translates to the commission of 780 crimes per day
Rapes, sexual and physical assaults, stabbings, home invasions, robberies, burglaries, and drug trafficking epidemic following the admission of more than 1.1 million migrants into the nation’s periphery during the last year
The suspects, each of whom ranges in age from 16 to 17 years, purportedly surrounded the youth, believed to have been younger than 15 years of age at the time of the incident, physically accosting him and eventually forcing the teen into a nearby woodland where he was later buffeted with spit prior to his being anally penetrated by the group in succession
The ordeal, which the assailants had videotaped and threatened to broadcast over various social media networks, is believed to have lasted in excess of one hour
The U.S. State Department openly acknowledged the fact that in excess of 10,600 foreign nationals from Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador applied for refugee status or humanitarian parole by way of the CAM Program
Launched in December of 2014, the much maligned presidential decree was ratified as part of an Executive Order that was designed to aid displaced Central American youth seeking to be reunited with family members or relatives residing in the United States
ABBREVIATIONAL INDEX
CAM Initiative – Central American Minors Initiative
Co-authored by OSF Program Officer Anna Crowley and Program Specialist Katin Rosin, the review, written in compliance with Soros’s International Migration Initiative, attempts to portray the European refugee crisis as the “new normal,” and intimates the genesis of “new opportunities” for the OSF to garner a greater degree of onus in the global arena
Increases in the documented incidences of bubonic plague, measles, mumps, scarlet fever, tuberculosis, and whooping cough thought to coincide with the arrival of an estimated 31 million migrants into the United States during the last thirty years – from 11 million in 1986 to 42 million in 2015
One day prior to the decision to grant refugees recurring monetary payments in Greece, the European Commission, the Executive Extension of the EU (European Union) based in Brussels, Belgium and in Luxembourg, instituted a 700 million Euro (£500 Million) taxpayer funded humanitarian aid package intended to be used by charitable organizations to provide access to basic necessities and essentials to benefit migrant families
Immigrant households receiving an average of $6,234 in benefits, in comparison to those belonging to American born citizens, who receive $4,431 on average
Mathematical statistics present in the documented study reveal immigrants entering the United States from portions of Mexico and Central America were the major recipients of welfare benefits, averaging $8,251 annually – a figure that was 86 percent higher than the costs associated with native households during the same time frame
The spending proposal would allocate in excess of 600 million Euros, the monetary equivalent of €18,000 per person, to insure access to service amenities for the migratory influx while ignoring the plight of Berlin’s homeless population
Chebli, speaking in defense of Islamic Fundamentalist doctrine, openly stated that the tenets of Sharia Law can coexist with German Basic Law because it ‘largely regulates the relationship between God and man’
The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan (Link 1, Link 2, Link 3, Link 4), a method of operation devised in the 1970s as a means of mitigating the influence of individuals possessing Anglo-Saxon ancestral lineage, acknowledged as a possible impetus for the current influx
The government agency actively soliciting the services of a company or firm capable of producing a minimum of 4 million work authorization permits annually for a period of five years, with 9 million to be manufactured in the initial stages of production, all at the expense of taxpayers
Number is significantly higher than the 16,714 admitted to California, 15,002 sent to Texas, and the 8,879 relocated to New York during the same timespan
Necessary stipends purportedly being supplied to the U.S. Federal Government via the Mexican government’s 50 consulates located throughout the continental United States as a means of inhibiting the deportation of undocumented individuals
Written memorandum emphasizes the obligation of local government officials and council representatives to comply with the environmental restrictions outlined within the written contents of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that was initially formulated in 2016 as a series of statutes and ordinances, the context of which are elaborated on in greater detail in the links that follow:
The recently enacted provision mandates the abandonment of conventional methods of transportation by 50 Percent of California state residents inhabiting core transit hubs in favor of taxpayer funded ecologically-compliant bike shares, foot travel, or use of a public conveyance - The formulated strategy, actively endorsed by Nicole Garetz, the Executive Director of the nonprofit Climate Action Campaign in San Diego, obligates residents of the city to participate in a compulsory plan designed to reduce their carbon footprint through the elimination of greenhouse gas emissions.
Disturbing revelations of legislative abuses of power revealed during the course of a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing where Lynch openly admitted to having internally discussed the possibility of pursuing civil actions against “climate change deniers,” only to later have such concerns “referred to the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) to consider whether or not it meets the criteria for which action could be taken.”
The Obama Administration appointed public official responding to a line of questioning by Junior Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island who urged Lynch to prosecute those who “pretend that the science of carbon emissions’ dangers is unsettled,” particularly those in the “fossil fuel industry” who supposedly have constructed a “climate denial apparatus.”
Report authored by the Global Commission on the Economy & Climate (GCEC) stresses the importance of compact cities, with civilian populations becoming wholly reliant on public transit.
