Home » » What Donald Trump Should Have Said in Response to Jeb Bush's Pathetic Attempts to Preserve the Presidential Legacy of George W Bush

What Donald Trump Should Have Said in Response to Jeb Bush's Pathetic Attempts to Preserve the Presidential Legacy of George W Bush

Written By Michael Reign on Wednesday, February 17, 2016 | 9:34 PM


Syndicated hosts of various radio/ audio-televised broadcasts across America sought to downplay the significance of the verbal exchange between Republican National Committee (RNC) front-runner Donald Trump and party establishment favorite Jeb Bush. Pandering to ill informed audiences throughout the United States who have made the conscious decision to remain blissfully unaware of the Bush family’s actual legacy, a vast majority of those entrusted with reporting information disputing Trump’s assertions have resorted to levying personal attacks against the character of an individual with whom very few have even attempted to acquire a semblance of familiarity with. The brief 3 minute and 2 second confrontation between both of the aforementioned candidates vying for political office that accompanies this entry is significant, in that the truth regarding the Bush Administration’s justification for preemptively engaging in a series of militarily-conducted operations in Iraq is laid bare - as deficiencies present within the intelligence community’s initial assessments of a collaborative foray between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network were later proven to be unsubstantiated.

LINKED ARTICLES OF REFERENCE:

As Early as 2002, Officials Present Within the CIA and Other Agencies of the U.S. Intelligence Community Were Made Cognizant of the Fact That There Was No Conclusive Evidence of a Relationship Between Saddam Hussein’s Political Regime and Osama bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda Terrorist Network

The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, an Independent Panel Charged With Investigating a Connection Between Iraq and Al-Qaeda-Based Terrorist Affiliates Loyal to Osama bin Laden, Finds ‘No Credible Evidence’ of a Link Between the Two With Regard to the Events of September 11, 2001

The premise regarding the existence of a stockpile of chemical munitions - biological warfare agents later termed by members of the Bush Administration’s cabinet to merit classification as ‘weapons of mass destruction’ - being housed in Iraq by Hussein’s political regime was also proven to be disingenuous, as the following articles of reference clearly illustrate:

LINKED ARTICLES OF REFERENCE:

George W Bush Was Fully Aware of the Fact That Saddam Hussein Did Not Possess Weapons of Mass Destruction

The Iraq Survey Group (ISG), an Investigative Team of Intelligence Analysts and Military Service Personnel Dispatched by the MNF-I (Multi-National Force - Iraq) Acting Under the Direction and Authority of the Bush Administration, Determined That Iraq Had Long Since Abandoned Its Quest to Develop Chemical, Biological, and Nuclear Weapons Technologies as Saddam Hussein Dismantled the Nation’s Nuclear Program in 1991

Presupposed Vindication of the Bush Administration’s Rationale for Preemptive Tactical Weapons Offensives in Iraq as a Means of Preventing the Transport and Delivery of Biochemical Warfare Agents to Terrorist Nationals Proven to Have Been Based on Fabrication 

Michael Morell, Former CIA Deputy Director and Presidential Daily Brief Coordinator for the Bush Administration Formally Admits That Members of the Aforementioned Political Regime Intentionally Misrepresented Intelligence Information Pertaining to the Subject of a Nonexistent Biological Weapons Program in Iraq as Justification for the 2003 Gulf War


Here is what should have been said in response to statements made by Jeb Bush in defense of his family’s legacy and what he would have the American people believe to be a ’pristine reputation’ without blemish:

Jeb Bush: “My dad is the greatest man alive in my mind.” - Referring to George Herbert Walker Bush, the 41st President of the United States.

- The appropriate response here would have been the following:

Donald Trump: “Well Jeb, now that you have decided to bring up the accomplishments of your father and how you have made the conscious decision to venerate him to a position for which he is clearly unworthy, let’s talk about something he oftentimes mentioned during the course of several of his speeches to the American people - a phrase he used on many occasions emphasizing the necessity of a New World Order to combat the injustices of despotic political regimes across the globe. Would you care to elaborate - for the benefit of your legions of supporters - on the nature of this organization? Would you please enlighten the American people as to the exact meaning behind this phrase, inquiring minds would like to know.”

Two of the more noted instances of George Herbert Walker Bush’s use of the phrase, ‘New World Order,’ detailed in the illustrations below:



Later Jeb Bush would laud the achievements of his brother during his eight-year presidential tenure using this argument: 

Jeb Bush: “While Donald Trump was building a reality TV show, my brother was building a security apparatus to keep us safe, and I’m proud of what he did.”

- This would have been a fitting reply to Bush’s refutation, as this statement could have been made in addition to an earlier utterance: 

“The World Trade Center came down during his reign, remember that. That’s not keeping us safe.”

Donald Trump: “Pride is the bane of many an individual, especially those in whom such visions of grandiosity are misplaced. Your brother wasn’t responsible for keeping America safe, rather, his plan of action undermined the liberties and freedoms of the entire U.S. population through the passage of the Patriot Act, the repeated use of warrantless wiretapping surveillance campaigns as a means of acquiring intelligence information on unsuspecting citizens, the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security - as well as the creation of the TSA (Transportation Security Administration) - both of which, I might add, have routinely abused their scope of authority.”

Not long after issuing these statements, Bush would sing the praises of the family’s matriarch, a woman he would describe using this flowery endorsement:

Jeb Bush: "Look, I won the lottery when I was born 63 years ago, looked up and I saw my mom, my mom is the strongest woman I know.”

- This response, sans Trump’s reply regarding the possibility of Bush’s mother running for political office, would have been timely:

Donald Trump: “Your mother? Yeah, Jeb, she’s a real piece of work that one, what about her contempt for America’s men and servicewomen, isn’t she quoted as saying this when the bodies of our soldiers were being shipped home to their families after her husband’s grandstanding in Iraq?”


Snopes.com confirms the reality of this statement, and while the site prides itself on uncovering the truth regarding issues possessing relevancy in terms of their significance in the political arena, there are instances where their investigative talents have come under scrutiny - most notably in reference to the existence of the UNODA (United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs), a globalist appendage they insist is the subject of conspiratorial conjecture.

CONCLUSION: People can, and more often than not, will, debate the legacy of their representatives ad infinitum, the subject of Bush’s impeachment for war crimes is justified, but rather than impeaching the two-time president, he should be incarcerated, along with the entirety of his cabinet - as should Obama; former Attorney General Eric Holder; John McCain, U.S. Senatorial Representative of Arizona; John Boehner, Speaker of the House of Representatives (2011-2015); Paul Ryan, the acting Speaker of the House of Representatives; Nancy Pelosi, current Minority Leader of the United States House of Representatives; Hillary Rodham Clinton, former U.S. Senator and Secretary of State; etc. 
In fact, a considerable majority of Congress should be included in this brief listing, a fact evidenced in the statistics detailed below:

The present day U.S. Congress includes several dozen members who have committed various crimes, perpetrated numerous falsehoods relative to their moral standing and have routinely engaged in unscrupulous fiscal endeavors at the expense of the public interest. The following written appendage details such transgressions in their entirety:

29 members have been formally accused of spousal abuse

7 have been arrested for engaging in fraudulent enterprises and acts of extortion

19 have been formally accused of willfully utilizing written instrumentation to defraud preexistent financial institutions

117 members have either directly or indirectly contributed to the bankruptcy of at least two separate businesses or corporate-level entities

3 have been formally indicted and subsequently incarcerated for aggravated assault

71 Congressional representatives are unable to obtain a viable line of credit due to the incidence of numerous malapropisms relative to corroboratory financial reports/ statements and cursory ecumenical evaluations

14 members have been formally indicted on charges of acting in principal to engage in the commission of drug-related criminal offenses and/ or in the assumption of a participatory role in the distribution or purchase of narcotic paraphernalia

8 have been arrested for shoplifting or acting in principal in the commission of misdemeanor criminal activities equivalent to petty larceny

21 members are currently defendants in various litigations/ court-related proceedings

84 Congressional representatives have been formally indicted for driving under the influence; willfully operating a motor vehicle or other method of transportation while otherwise suffering undue sensory level impairment within the last 5 years

This statistical demographic represents the 535 members of the United States Congress. The very same political entity that manufactures hundreds of new laws and regulations each year designed to maintain a semblance of order.

These individuals shouldn’t be representing the will of anyone in America, they have betrayed their oath of office and have demonstrated time and time again a willingness to sacrifice what little yet remains of their moral constitution to enrich themselves at the expense of their public constituents. Yet, for the most part, people in the United States have come to tolerate these breaches of trust, some choosing to embrace them as a way of life, equating these trespasses as aspects of human nature and spiritual imperfection that should be celebrated - not condemned - as a vital role in the personal and psychological growth of an individual. There is no crisis of conscience present in those who would deign to assume such responsibility, as all are guilty of telling you what you want to hear at any given moment. There are no consequences for dereliction of duty, no threat of repercussions - and therefore none afforded - to those claiming to possess a vested interest in the welfare of the nation, because they are never held accountable by those who would elect them into office. How effortlessly the citizens of this country forget their transgressions against the fundamental tenets of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, lose sight of the fact that their personal freedoms are being trampled upon on a daily basis by a multitude of alphabet agencies whose genesis was born from the shadows of deception, etc. How convenient for them that most of the people residing in the United States have become so inebriated with the triviality of technological innovation and the allure of athletic spectacle, celebrity, and entertainment, that they have allowed such blatant abuses of power to go unchallenged. 

DISCLAIMER - Prospective viewing audiences assuming a level of commitment to any one particular candidate on either side of the political spectrum on the part of the author would be voicing an opinion that is absent of substance, as there is one adage to which all should be made aware of:

Consummate politicians, like individuals seeking to acquire a mantle of authority to which they themselves are not entitled, assume a role designed by the most prominent members of their respective party’s establishment to ingratiate themselves to the ‘plebeian’ masses by placating the desires of the willfully ignorant with promises of prosperity. Their inherent purpose, one based on the notion that a vast majority of the general public is somehow incapable of conducting themselves in an appropriate manner, is opposed to the concept of self reliance, and is therefore obligated to have every aspect of their daily lives micromanaged by a faceless cadre of bureaucrats who ‘know better than they do’ is the unacknowledged reality. The Federal Government has no business regulating the lives of those to which it seeks to acquire dominion over, as it has become an illegitimate enterprise rife with corruption whose continuance has been guaranteed by the apathetic indifference of a population that has become more concerned with the inanity of celebrity and entertainment, than the welfare of future generations. 
Share this article :

0 comments:

Speak your mind and let your voice be heard.

This is a censorship free discussion area.

 
Support: Creating Website | Johny Template | Mas Template
Ωmnibus ™ and © Michael Reign. All Rights Reserved.
Template Created by Creating Website Published by Mas Template
Site modifications and enhancements by Michael Reign c/o Legerdemain Technologies